NVIDIA GeForce GTX 400 series coming March 26

ThraxThrax 🐌Austin, TX Icrontian
edited February 2010 in Science & Tech

Comments

  • edited February 2010
    I commend Nvidia for being ambitious and trying to bring something revolutionary instead of evolutionary in the computing world. They could have followed the industry trend as they did until now to bring incremental performance improvements following Microsoft's DX numbers. I hope they succeed.
  • UPSLynxUPSLynx :KAPPA: Redwood City, CA Icrontian
    edited February 2010
    After all this time, March will be when we find out if it has all been worth it or not.

    Looking forward to the reveal, I hope it's impressive.
  • Cliff_ForsterCliff_Forster Icrontian
    edited February 2010
    Personally I just hope it makes crossfireing my 5870 cost less.

    Honestly though, I am curious, I want to see the price and the benchmarking.
  • edited February 2010
    I was discussing the configuration of a new cluster with a vendor last week. This is the first time they asked from the onset what kind of cluster we were going to configure; a traditional CPU based cluster or a GF100 Fermi based Tesla cluster. I am sure GF100 will be in the same (or better) class with whatever ATI has right now regarding gaming, but I actually do not care about that as much; GF100 is more than just a gaming technology. If beating ATI in gaming performance was the only goal, this could have been done with a much simpler design.
  • Cliff_ForsterCliff_Forster Icrontian
    edited February 2010
    mirage wrote:
    I was discussing the configuration of a new cluster with a vendor last week. This is the first time they asked from the onset what kind of cluster we were going to configure; a traditional CPU based cluster or a GF100 Fermi based Tesla cluster. I am sure GF100 will be in the same (or better) class with whatever ATI has right now regarding gaming, but I actually do not care about that as much; GF100 is more than just a gaming technology. If beating ATI in gaming performance was the only goal, this could have been done with a much simpler design.

    Right, because the Radeon 58xx is such a slouch?? :confused:
  • edited February 2010
    I did not say slouch. 58xx is where it needs to be today and it will also be old tech in one or two years. I think I am getting too old to get impressed with the latest every two-three years.
  • Cliff_ForsterCliff_Forster Icrontian
    edited February 2010
    mirage wrote:
    I did not say slouch. 58xx is where it needs to be today and it will also be old tech in one or two years. I think I am getting too old to get impressed with the latest every two-three years.

    I just have this "put up or shut up" attitude with all things Fermi at this point of my life.

    Its this mythical wonder, but nobody knows what market its for, how it performs, when exactly it will be available, or how much it will ultimately cost, but we all know it will be awesome because Nvidia says so. I'm just at that point with it, put it out there, give Icrontic a sample to run through the testing wringer, tell me how much I would have to pay, and when I can get one then I will sing your praises, or offer valid criticism, but until then, stop telling me how revolutionary it is.
  • edited February 2010
    I can buy an arm and a leg for cheaper than this cards will cost!!
  • edited February 2010
    I am the romantic, dreamer type then :) Well, let's see.
  • TimTim Southwest PA Icrontian
    edited February 2010
    Why did Nvidia skip the 300s? They went from 280-285-290-295 straight to 400? No GTX 340 or 360 or whatever.
  • Sledgehammer70Sledgehammer70 California Icrontian
    edited February 2010
    Tim the 300 series was a refresh of 200 series parts. But as for the 400 series these parts are rumored to be hot & will also be scarce at launch. AMD will have & keep their lead as they have had time to refine their process to make the 5000 cards, and Nvidia is just ramping up. From the looks of it Nvidia might have a card that can crunch more numbers than anything to date... & the whole idea of being able to boost tessellation in gaming has been something developers have wanted to do for years. The biggest thing to look for is... will the 400 series push the FPS with all the pretty goodies. The card looks to be able to beat the 5000 series on paper but it might have to do it while running very very hot.

    If I go to the 400 series it will be a water cooled setup for sure.

    The way they word that launch is they will most likely be giving cards away during the presentation.
  • ThraxThrax 🐌 Austin, TX Icrontian
    edited February 2010
    FX 5900 v2.0 lololol.
  • Joe
    edited February 2010
    I'm with cliff put up or shut up, and by the way how many times can they rename a 8800!?!
  • DrLiamDrLiam British Columbia
    edited February 2010
    I'm rooting for Nvidia simply because I don't want to see them bomb and fall off the market.. ATi needs the strong competition.
  • TimTim Southwest PA Icrontian
    edited February 2010
    Ah, my mistake, there were 300 series cards only available in pre-built OEM systems. OK.
  • Sledgehammer70Sledgehammer70 California Icrontian
    edited February 2010
    I have personally seen the GTX 480 in action as some of the IC guys have also. It is pretty safe to say this is not going to be a 5900 debacle
  • BandrikBandrik Elkhart, IN Icrontian
    edited February 2010
    I have a machine with a Nvidia Riva 128. I wonder if its time to upgrade it... I hear Quake III is coming out soon.
  • Sledgehammer70Sledgehammer70 California Icrontian
    edited February 2010
    Will most likely need a new PSU :) wait scratch that.... most likely an entire new system.
Sign In or Register to comment.