Utilities Discussion - Week 2
profdlp
The Holy City Of Westlake, Ohio
NOTE: To understand what is going on here, you should first read the topic "SM Recommended Utilities" in the Short-Media Pub!
http://www.short-media.com/forum/showthread.php?s=&threadid=701
Thanks for all of you who gave your input last on last weeks topics.:)
This week we will have a "benchmark" theme.
The categories are:
1) CD Drive Speed Tester
2) HD Speed Benchmark
3) Video Performance Benchmark
As before, you can recommend up to three programs in each category, using this format:
$ - <Name Of Program> - for programs you would pay for.
F/S - <Name Of Program> - for freeware/shareware programs
XXX - <Name Of Program> - for programs you wouldn't use if they paid you.
As an example, here are my recommended programs:
CD Drive Speed Tester:
$ No Choice
F/S CD Speed 2000
XXX No Choice
HD Speed Benchmark:
$ HD Tach
F/S ATTO
XXX No Choice
Video Performance Benchmark:
$ 3DMark - Full
F/S 3DMark - "lite"
XXX No Choice
Any additional comments you want to add are encouraged - some good quotable comments will make the final article much more interesting. Please make your recommendations obvious enough so I don't miss them - I want your input to be included in what will eventually become a master list of our members favorites.
Prof
(This weeks categories will remain open for one week)
http://www.short-media.com/forum/showthread.php?s=&threadid=701
Thanks for all of you who gave your input last on last weeks topics.:)
This week we will have a "benchmark" theme.
The categories are:
1) CD Drive Speed Tester
2) HD Speed Benchmark
3) Video Performance Benchmark
As before, you can recommend up to three programs in each category, using this format:
$ - <Name Of Program> - for programs you would pay for.
F/S - <Name Of Program> - for freeware/shareware programs
XXX - <Name Of Program> - for programs you wouldn't use if they paid you.
As an example, here are my recommended programs:
CD Drive Speed Tester:
$ No Choice
F/S CD Speed 2000
XXX No Choice
HD Speed Benchmark:
$ HD Tach
F/S ATTO
XXX No Choice
Video Performance Benchmark:
$ 3DMark - Full
F/S 3DMark - "lite"
XXX No Choice
Any additional comments you want to add are encouraged - some good quotable comments will make the final article much more interesting. Please make your recommendations obvious enough so I don't miss them - I want your input to be included in what will eventually become a master list of our members favorites.
Prof
(This weeks categories will remain open for one week)
0
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
$ No Choice
F/S No Choice
XXX No Choice
HD Speed Benchmark:
$ Sandra Pro
F/S ATTO
XXX No Choice
Video Performance Benchmark:
$ 3DMarkFull
F/S 3DMark Basic
XXX No Choice
When I say 3DMARK, I mean 3DMARK 2001. It's much better for the average system at the moment. It will probably be about another year before I start using version 2003 on a regular basis.
$ No Choice
F/S No Choice
XXX No Choice
HD Speed Benchmark:
$ No Choice
F/S ATTO
XXX No Choice
Video Performance Benchmark:
$ No Choice
F/S No Choice
XXX No Choice
$ No Choice
F/S No Choice
XXX No Choice
HD Speed Benchmark:
$ HD Tach
F/S ATTO
XXX No Choice
Video Performance Benchmark:
$ No Choice
F/S 3d Mark
XXX No Choice
$$: CDTach
F/S: SiSoft Sandra 2003
XXX: NONE
HD Speed Benchmark:
$$: Atto Disk Benchmark
F/S: HD Tach
XXX: NONE
Video Performance Benchmark:
$$: MadOnion's 3DMark2001 SE
F/S: GLExcess
XXX: MadOnion's 3DMark2003