ECS P67/H67 motherboard roundup

mertesnmertesn I am Bobby MillerYukon, OK Icrontian
edited July 2011 in Science & Tech

Comments

  • TimTim Southwest PA Icrontian
    edited July 2011
    Nice motherboard. I see it supports 32 GB of RAM. But only has 4 memory slots. I looked around a bit on a few computer parts sites, and couldn't find any RAM that was 8 GB per stick, only 2 X 4 GB kits. Not much 8GB per stick RAM available yet?
  • mertesnmertesn I am Bobby Miller Yukon, OK Icrontian
    edited July 2011
    Your observations are correct. 8GB DDR3 modules at any speed are difficult to locate. Hopefully sometime this year that will change.
  • TushonTushon I'm scared, Coach Alexandria, VA Icrontian
    edited July 2011
    Man, reviews like this make me want to build an Intel box ... I feel like I'm going to the dark side.
  • Cliff_ForsterCliff_Forster Icrontian
    edited July 2011
    As a general statement, ECS has come a long way in the enthusiast space in just a couple years. For years I used their mATX boards in simple builds for people that just wanted something simple and reliable. The OEM's used them for a reason, it was not that they were just cheap, they were actually really consistent low frills boards. ECS boards just worked for a stock system. The problem was that they did nothing to address the enthusiast market, instead catering to bulk OEM customers and to builders that had modest needs for a simple but reliable system.

    The ECS Black boards have remedied this, and I know the perception is that ECS is this cheap OEM vendor, but it's really not, they are one of the best motherboard manufacturers currently. I have absolutely zero hesitation recommending ECS Black boards for enthusiast builds. They are well constructed, reliable, and they generally look amazing. They are also trendsetting. The new monochrome color scheme that ECS has been using on their Black boards, allot of manufacturers are copying (I've seen boards from Gigabyte and Asus, that prove that imitation is the sincerest form of flattery).
  • SuperStrifeSuperStrife Florida
    edited July 2011
    Tushon wrote:
    Man, reviews like this make me want to build an Intel box ... I feel like I'm going to the dark side.

    I know right? I switched over for my current rig, as you just can't beat the i5 2500k in terms of gaming value. (also with a decent cooler and some tech knowledge you can run them at 4.5 ghz and 50C...I suspect Ivy will clock even better too)
    I know bulldozer will be out soon enough, but then again, Ivy bridge is probably going to keep Intel ahead by a generation in pretty much the same manner they are now.
  • fatcatfatcat Mizzou Icrontian
    edited July 2011
    meh, multi-GPU needs to be 16x|16x

    (hugs my X58 board)
  • TushonTushon I'm scared, Coach Alexandria, VA Icrontian
    edited July 2011
    Yeah, I don't know why that isn't the standard ...
  • SuperStrifeSuperStrife Florida
    edited July 2011
    Probably because of this:
    http://lesithdx.blogspot.com/2011/04/sli-using-dual-pcie-16x-vs-8x-how-much.html

    In case you dont want to watch of course, he ran the 2 cards at 8x in 3dmark11 to get a score of X3386

    at 16x this increases to a stellar X3389.

    (also PCIe is upgraded quite quickly, and the 2.0 8x is as fast as 1.0 16x. This could be a reason with 3.0 coming out to not hurry and make x16 x16 standard. Also it could be that like in the above video....you just dont use that extra bandwidth)
  • Cliff_ForsterCliff_Forster Icrontian
    edited July 2011
    Probably because of this:
    http://lesithdx.blogspot.com/2011/04/sli-using-dual-pcie-16x-vs-8x-how-much.html

    In case you dont want to watch of course, he ran the 2 cards at 8x in 3dmark11 to get a score of X3386

    at 16x this increases to a stellar X3389.

    (also PCIe is upgraded quite quickly, and the 2.0 8x is as fast as 1.0 16x. This could be a reason with 3.0 coming out to not hurry and make x16 x16 standard. Also it could be that like in the above video....you just dont use that extra bandwidth)

    2 8X 2.0 slots are adequate for scaling. I'm running a pair of 6850's that way, and for the first time I'm actually playing Crysis in Ultra settings with some AA. It is glorious. I thought I was having some problems in F1 2010, but it's not crossfire, its how that game handles a six core CPU (not well).
Sign In or Register to comment.