Battlefield 3 Alpha benchmarked (translation)

mertesnmertesn I am Bobby MillerYukon, OK Icrontian
edited September 2011 in Gaming
Battlefield 3 Alpha benchmarked (translation)

Comments

  • fatcatfatcat Mizzou Icrontian
    edited August 2011
    no Crossfire benchies :(

    and Intel still beating AMD..

    nothing shocking here
  • JakeL
    edited August 2011
    I think it's hilarious that the benchmarker makes a complaint about the terrible performance of dual core machines, when the alpha MINIMUM requirements CLEARLY stated that at least a quad core machine was needed. I don't see that changing for retail.
  • _k_k P-Town, Texas Icrontian
    edited August 2011
    fatcat, I wouldn't expect crossfire benches until NDA is lifted. Mean green released a beta driver to try and support alpha testing better, did not seem to help it from being so quirky. Oh well, that is alpha for you.

    If you are really interested in it check the BF3 blog. They are changing the temp and feel of the game.
  • Sledgehammer70Sledgehammer70 California Icrontian
    edited August 2011
    Just a FYI.. the GTX485M runs the basic version of the Alpha with 0 issues.
  • fatcatfatcat Mizzou Icrontian
    edited August 2011
    _k_ wrote:
    fatcat, I wouldn't expect crossfire benches until NDA is lifted. Mean green released a beta driver to try and support alpha testing better, did not seem to help it from being so quirky. Oh well, that is alpha for you.

    If you are really interested in it check the BF3 blog. They are changing the temp and feel of the game.

    i mean, if i wasn't lazy and under NDA, I could benchmark it with my Crossfire 6970s...but, yanno
  • Spectre
    edited August 2011
    Fatcat,

    Yeah, Intel is also twice as expensive and honestly, I don't think an unnecessary +15 fps boost is really worth +$50-80
  • Cliff_ForsterCliff_Forster Icrontian
    edited August 2011
    If these are accurate performance is much better than I anticipated.
  • fatcatfatcat Mizzou Icrontian
    edited August 2011
    Spectre wrote:
    Fatcat,

    Yeah, Intel is also twice as expensive and honestly, I don't think an unnecessary +15 fps boost is really worth +$50-80

    AMD 1100T $195
    Intel i5-760 $204
    Intel i7-960 $199


    where is the twice as expensive?
  • Cliff_ForsterCliff_Forster Icrontian
    edited August 2011
    We all know a 640X480 gaming CPU benchmark is absolutely worthless.
  • fatcatfatcat Mizzou Icrontian
    edited August 2011
    CPU gaming benchmarks are worthless :)
  • RyanFodderRyanFodder Detroit, MI Icrontian
    edited August 2011
    Looks like I'm going to have to upgrade mobo/cpu/ram soon.

    Been putting this off for a couple years now.
  • FPSDeSniper
    edited August 2011
    I was in the alpha test I was very much impressed by how good everything was for it still being an alpha
  • gurramurra
    edited September 2011
    omg... will my gigabyte GTX 550 TI OC and my AMD Phenom(tm) II x4 840 3.20 Ghz processor take this game on atleast 40 FPS on high ?
  • phry
    edited September 2011
    hello everyone...can someone tell me if i will be able to run bf3 on max (not U.H settings) with the following

    win 7 64bit
    8gb ram
    i5 650 3.2ghz (want to oc to 3.6-8 max)
    gtx 560ti (or wait for KEPLER GPU)
    1600x900 MAX RESOLUTION

    what will i be able to get from this set up
  • Slayer5227Slayer5227 Elkridge Member
    edited September 2011
    Beta is gonna be much more polished, I'm sure everyone knows that. I still like AMD better so hate me xDDDD
  • OneDude03
    edited September 2011
    Hi all. Can I run Battlefield 3, Low-Medium settings

    Core 2 Duo E8400 3.0ghz
    8GB Kingston HyperX DDR2 Ram
    Radeon HD 4890
    1680x1050 Resolution
Sign In or Register to comment.