Why get a full tablet instead of Kindle Fire? This is why
Thrax
🐌Austin, TX Icrontian
The Kindle Fire is likely to be the device to get for hacking a full install of Android onto, but that's not for everyone. Some people just want a device that works out of the box, and they never want to dig into it beyond that.
I have said time and time again that this device is more of an "appliance" or "curated device" than it is a tablet. You can do what Amazon says you can do, but no more. And by no more, I really mean that:
Like the Nook, which had limited resources--whether through hardware or software--to run all Android applications, the Kindle Fire is no different. You will have access to the Amazon app store, not the Android market, and the significantly smaller library of apps that represents. Even if you had the capability to somehow sideload applications from SD, there's no telling if they will run.
The Kindle Fire is not a real tablet.
I have said time and time again that this device is more of an "appliance" or "curated device" than it is a tablet. You can do what Amazon says you can do, but no more. And by no more, I really mean that:
Turns out that Amazon has turned off many APIs that are available on other Android devices, so many Android apps won't run on the Amazon Kindle Fire.
When people talk about "fragmentation" this is what they mean.
Like the Nook, which had limited resources--whether through hardware or software--to run all Android applications, the Kindle Fire is no different. You will have access to the Amazon app store, not the Android market, and the significantly smaller library of apps that represents. Even if you had the capability to somehow sideload applications from SD, there's no telling if they will run.
The Kindle Fire is not a real tablet.
0
Comments
What about those of us that DO like to tinker and dig into things? The hardware specs appear pretty good and if the hacking community is doing well, is this going to impact them? I wouldn't think so. I see this being a great enthusiast tablet for a great price point and I'm a fan of that.
Having seen the new Nook Tablet I'm torn. It looks like it's going to be a revved up Nook Color. $200 is a wonderful price point. $250 puts it squarely in the "Is it worth the extra money?" slot.
No USB but additional storage capacity to add-on with? That's a big selling point, especially for the dev community.
Your thoughts?
But from a developer perspective, not having a microSD card does present some additional challenges. I don't think the Nook Color is worth the extra cash, though, because the 512MB of additional RAM may not mean all that much, and the Nook is an otherwise relatively ugly device compared to the Fire.
A USB cable and mass storage mode is not that much harder.
Yes, you should back up to somewhere off-device, but it's still a lot easier to do a scheduled backup to the SDCard then copy those backups to your computer when you get around to plugging in AND it makes it much more likely for the average person who isn't anal-retentive about backups to do it because you know damn well that if it's not automated most people won't do it.
EDIT: Further, I'm not sure why you're even arguing with me... I'm not saying that EVERYONE should want an sdcard slot. I'm just saying there's a valid reason to want one thankyouverymuch. Brah.
(I don't have a dog in this fight, just offering another option for those who might see it.)
Looks pretty promising on specs - http://www.geek.com/articles/gadgets/nook-tablet-vs-kindle-fire-how-the-specs-compare-2011117/
Decisions, decisions
Edit: here is the ipad2 in the mix http://www.geek.com/articles/mobile/ipad-2-vs-kindle-fire-vs-nook-tablet-specs-showdown-20111114/
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1348830