Also at least we can be safe in the fact that it wasn't one of the 'day of' game releases so it might be alright.
0
midga"There's so much hot dog in Rome" ~digi(> ^.(> O_o)>Icrontian
^This a million times this.
Also at least we can be safe in the fact that it wasn't one of the 'day of' game releases so it might be alright.
It's always bothered me to see a game that was developed concurrently with the movie. I mean, I understand the critical timing aspect of marketing products associated with this sort of IP, but if the movie ended up being a surprise flop, that's just even more dollars ashed. If the movie's a huge hit, or you have a great game concept that happens to fit well with a movie (Goldeneye fo' sho'), then by all means go for it. A movie game solely for the purpose of getting a kid who had excitement seizures watching the movie to annoy their parents into buying it for them? It just seems like a waste to me. =/
If you give me one good movie tie in game, I'll name you at least a dozen that were horrible.
The Spider-Man Movie game was good. A few of the Lord of the Rings games, while not mind blowing, were at least good. I liked the Phantom Menace Pod Racing game, not gonna lie. That said, there are litterally a hundred bad games released for marketing tie in's. It's like the indstry learned nothing from E.T.
Comments
/Trump
Also at least we can be safe in the fact that it wasn't one of the 'day of' game releases so it might be alright.
The Spider-Man Movie game was good. A few of the Lord of the Rings games, while not mind blowing, were at least good. I liked the Phantom Menace Pod Racing game, not gonna lie. That said, there are litterally a hundred bad games released for marketing tie in's. It's like the indstry learned nothing from E.T.