Google announces 1 GB per second internet and $0/a month internet
Theironhand
Centerline, Michigan Icrontian
I was on reddit when I found this....is this true?
EDIT
Looks like there only offering this in Kansas city, it cost $70 a month, or $0 a month with a $300 construction fee o.o...I wonder what they have to construct.
https://fiber.google.com/about/
EDIT
Looks like there only offering this in Kansas city, it cost $70 a month, or $0 a month with a $300 construction fee o.o...I wonder what they have to construct.
https://fiber.google.com/about/
0
Comments
The construction fee is to lay fiber to your house and wire you up. It ain't cheap. The $300 is waived with a 2-year contract on the $70/mo or $120/mo packages.
Also, Gigabit is almost 100 MB/s, I mean you can transfer 10 MB/s over 100Mb Ethernet from PC to PC
1 Gbit = ~100 megs/sec = 12GB game in 2 minutes.
It's wording can be confusing, the speed is fast.
I predicted this day would come sooner than later. My optimisim rewarded. Just a little "told ya so" accompanied by a big shit eatin grin! God I love forum archives.
I am the mighty oracle, bow to me!
My favorite moments from my good friend.....
"Prediction: in the next five years, the average bandwidth of a broadband connection will have increased less than 20%"
"Google has about as much bandwidth to give to the public as death valley has fresh water for the dehydrated children of Africa"
Although, I have yet to see any fine print, I'm sure it will come, reddit will be angry.
On the other hand, I think there's an inherent conflict of interest in an advertising company owning your Internet connection. I'm also concerned about the anti-competitive practice of taking your advertising profits and using them to underwrite your ISP business so its profitability doesn't matter.
If this were 2005 Google doing this I'd probably be a lot less wary.
2. As of December, 2011, there are 85 million broadband users in America. (Source: OECD)
3. The population of KCMO is 463,202 (Source: US Census Bureau)
4. If every resident in Kansas City took 1Gbit GFi, the average bandwidth in America would rise a mere... Well, I'm bad at math, but I'm sure it's a drop in the bucket.
Certainly not a told-you-so moment. Also, Google isn't expecting to reach all of KCMO's neighborhoods until late next year. 2 years of planning and 18 months of deployment for one city.
Broadband is going nowhere fast.
Comcast just recently doubled my speed from 25 megabit to 50 without raising my price. Think the news about a new advanced fiber network from Google motivated them a little bit? Maybe, maybe not, either way, I'm halfway there, and frankly, 50 megabit is pretty damn solid. Still I'm considering paying a little extra a month and getting a 100 megabit service, which they now offer in my suburban market. Comcast is in several major markets offering this service at a fairly obtainable cost. The adoption rate will improve and prices will continue to fall as Google makes its move over the next few years.
I know a few here will want to defend their argument including the average against an aging rural infrastructure. The USA is a huge country, so that is a challenge for obvious reasons. Frankly, I'm not that concerned about what kind of internet is available in the "middle of nowhere". They will lag, and this is acceptable. You make some trade off's when you decide to live in the country. If your want to fish in a clean pond, your internet is gonna be slower. For me, I'm concerned about the major urban and suburban markets, which many already have the 100 megabit offerings I predicted inside of five years. Broadband is getting better in this country. It's a fact.