I have a USB 3.0 external that I use for booting Ubuntu when I'm not in the mood to game. Just plug it in and it performs well enough that it's pretty seamless, you would not know you are working from an external drive. It's a nice little addition if your the type of user that likes toying around with different Linux installs without multiple partitions or dual boot weirdness on your windows drive.
It's kind of dumb to advertise its USB3 interface while putting a 5400 rpm drive in it! If they were serious about fast data transfer it'd have a 7200 rpm drive.
In fact, both rotational speeds are capable of exceeding a USB 2.0 connection, which is 480Mb/s I believe? So 60MB/s, which this clearly exceeds. As a side note, rotational speed doesn't affect sustained transfer rates as much as you'd expect. It has a much bigger impact on seek times, but since all seek times pale in comparison to an SSD, we are seeing a shift towards SSDs for cases where seek time matters, and low rpm drives for media storage and such where it doesn't matter (which external drives are perfectly suited and often used for).
Comments