Intel reserves this for their -X suffixed $500-1099 CPU platforms (e.g. Haswell-E, i7-5960X+X99 chipset). But data on those platforms suggest that quad channel isn't a performance benefit over DDR3 or DDR4 dual channel.
Anandtech says Sandy Bridge users finally have a reason to upgrade, but I'm still happy with my 2500k. If I had to buy a new CPU right now, I'd actually be more interested in the lower wattage Broadwell-DT, but the 5775C is practically unobtanium.
So the only other question is how soon this new Intel will take to make it on to the Hackintosh scene. (I am aware that you won't have an answer for that.)
@Gargoyle said:
Anandtech says Sandy Bridge users finally have a reason to upgrade, but I'm still happy with my 2500k. If I had to buy a new CPU right now, I'd actually be more interested in the lower wattage Broadwell-DT, but the 5775C is practically unobtanium.
I'm in exactly the same boat. I feel like the 2500k I bought years ago is still all I need in the performance department.
Comments
Why no quad channel ram?
Intel reserves this for their -X suffixed $500-1099 CPU platforms (e.g. Haswell-E, i7-5960X+X99 chipset). But data on those platforms suggest that quad channel isn't a performance benefit over DDR3 or DDR4 dual channel.
What's the most recent Intel CPU/chipset from which you'd consider this a worthwhile upgrade?
Sandy Bridge (e.g. i7-2600K).
//edit: Fixed codename.
Anandtech says Sandy Bridge users finally have a reason to upgrade, but I'm still happy with my 2500k. If I had to buy a new CPU right now, I'd actually be more interested in the lower wattage Broadwell-DT, but the 5775C is practically unobtanium.
I'm wondering what impact this will have as a milestone.
Yeah, typo. Thanks. Fixed.
Anything mini itx on the horizon?
Many.
Does this light a fire under AMD's ass? The thought of building Intel makes me feel kind of dirty inside.
So I would see somewhat marginal performance gains over a 3770k? Even less with OC?
+3 FPS in a game best case, but sometimes less performance. More uplift in synthetic tests or specifically multi-threaded DCC apps.
Seems like I can save some money then.
So the only other question is how soon this new Intel will take to make it on to the Hackintosh scene. (I am aware that you won't have an answer for that.)
I'm in exactly the same boat. I feel like the 2500k I bought years ago is still all I need in the performance department.
It probably is. You probably don't play any very modern games with a GPU that would be information-starved by a 2500K.
Hell... I still feel like the Phenom II X4 I bought like 5 years ago is giving me enough performance. All hail the GPU era.
When is Intel going to make a mistake architecture like the P4 again so my AMD stock goes back up?
Sincerely,
The dubmass who bought AMD at $30/sh back in the P4 vs Athlon XP days.
lol "Presshot"
I'd like to propose "Skylame."