Post your 3DMark03 Benchmarks

SpinnerSpinner Birmingham, UK
edited August 2010 in Hardware
I noticed all the 3DMark03 based threads were a bit few and far between, so I thought I would start an official 'post your score' thread for easy reference.

Here's my latest, taken today. ATI Catalyst 4.2's. Everything stock.
«134

Comments

  • SpinnerSpinner Birmingham, UK
    edited February 2004
    Come on! Which one of you benchmarking lightweights can beat my score? I know it ain't nothing special, but the lack of response to this thread makes me wonder whether it's better than I thought it was.

    Come on if ya think ya hard enough! :woowoo:
  • pseudonympseudonym Michigan Icrontian
    edited February 2004
    Looks like our setups are running fairly similar. All at stock.

    Cat 3.10s
    Win2000
    XP 3000+
    Abit NF7-S V2
    ATI 9800 NP->Pro
    Mushkin lvl 1 PC3200
  • GnomeWizarddGnomeWizardd Member 4 Life Akron, PA Icrontian
    edited February 2004
    Yea the FX 5900 is a POS for 180 bucks! :buck:
  • GnomeWizarddGnomeWizardd Member 4 Life Akron, PA Icrontian
    edited February 2004
    oh and thats stock! I havent got the balls to OC anything yet
  • pseudonympseudonym Michigan Icrontian
    edited February 2004
    Uh oh, looks like I'm gonna have to step it up tonight. Time to turn that hairdryer back to 12v. :)
  • Al_CapownAl_Capown Indiana
    edited February 2004
    GnomeWizardd wrote:
    oh and thats stock! I havent got the balls to OC anything yet
    Woman :ninja:
  • GnomeWizarddGnomeWizardd
    ocs the almighty A64 and the Geforce fx 5900!
     Member 4 Life Akron, PA Icrontian
    edited February 2004
    ocs the almighty A64 and the Geforce fx 5900!
  • fudgamfudgam Upstate New York
    edited February 2004
    Muhahaha, bow to me!!!
  • pseudonympseudonym Michigan Icrontian
    edited February 2004
    D'OH!!! I'll be back.

    /me hangs his head in shame....
  • GnomeWizarddGnomeWizardd Member 4 Life Akron, PA Icrontian
    edited February 2004
    oh boy! if it wasnt 11:30 id oc my A64 and catch up but i must sleep for work is in 6 hrs!
  • croc_croc_ New
    edited February 2004
    :)

    attachment.php?attachmentid=5555&stc=1
  • pseudonympseudonym Michigan Icrontian
    edited February 2004
    DEAR GOD croc!!! I was hoping to come back and be in the lead for a bit more, forget that. I have my card just about maxed out (about 5mhz more for core and ram each, maybe a bit more than that) and I'm having trouble getting my 3000+ to run over 2500 mhz and over 410 fsb. Somethings up and I'm not sure what it is. I'll have to sit down for a few and figure it out.

    //edit- Threw in the Aquamark for fun.
  • fudgamfudgam Upstate New York
    edited February 2004
    O, whatever..... you cheated :crazy:
  • GnomeWizarddGnomeWizardd Member 4 Life Akron, PA Icrontian
    edited February 2004
    ok now this started out as STOCK scores!
  • NeoFXNeoFX Utah, US of A
    edited February 2004
    lol...
    My "stock" score
    2.6Ghz and stock flashed speeds for my 5900NU
    http://ap.zero-6.com/Images/3DMK03current.jpg

    ...My NON stock scores... (5900NU flashed)
    http://ap.zero-6.com/Images/3DMK03best.jpg

    I win croc :P CPU was at 3.25Ghz and 500/1000 on the 5900NU for the non stock one.
  • croc_croc_ New
    edited February 2004
    NeoFX wrote:
    lol...
    My "stock" score
    2.6Ghz and stock flashed speeds for my 5900NU
    http://ap.zero-6.com/Images/3DMK03current.jpg

    ...My NON stock scores... (5900NU flashed)
    http://ap.zero-6.com/Images/3DMK03best.jpg

    I win croc :P CPU was at 3.25Ghz and 500/1000 on the 5900NU for the non stock one.

    Who said it was a contest? :P
  • NeoFXNeoFX Utah, US of A
    edited February 2004
    Nobody :P It shouldn't be, lol. I just had to win something today so I could feel like a winner :P

    There many scores that will own either of ours, lol.
  • croc_croc_ New
    edited February 2004
    NeoFX wrote:
    Nobody :P It shouldn't be, lol. I just had to win something today so I could feel like a winner :P

    There many scores that will own either of ours, lol.

    Don't make me push out a few more MHz!!! :P~
  • paroxymparoxym Toronto, Canada
    edited February 2004
    yay
  • NeoFXNeoFX Utah, US of A
    edited February 2004
    Wait till I cool off my CPU and my case and I WILL put out a few more Mhz :P lol. I can't reach your 3.7Ghz with my kind of cooling tho so ya got me beat with raw speed :P

    New scores... Overclocked my flashed 5950U a bit to 510/975

    CPUZ ...
    CPUZ.jpg

    and the 3d Mark 03 + Update score

    3DMK03current.jpg
  • treeztreez
    edited February 2004
    Nvidia came out with the 5800ultra months late supposedly to dominate the Radeon 9700pro, it didn’t do it. As far as the statistics and I am concerned those two cards were for the most part neck and neck given the bottle-neck except for (ps2.0 performance) affecting both cards in different ways. But the 9700pro certainly had better hardware design for pixel shader 2.0, hence better performance in certain games, and benchmarks alike. But the lead is not that great as the hype (Ati vs Nvidia) would have one imagine. Nvidia simply made the mistake of not using a 256bit DDR2 memory for the 5800ultra. So Ati comes out better in this scenario, and its ps2.0 hardware is definitely superior. I have done some benchmarking of my own to make sense of purchasing one of these new cards such as the ATI 9800XT and the Nvidia FX5950Ultra, to replace my year old 5800ultra. After a couple hours benchmarking, I see no reason to purchase either of the new high end cards period, wait for the new Radeon and Nvidia cards to come out by the fall. Unless you just have unlimited funds to play with or you are just an idiot. Because of the benchmark scores I got compared to the two cards reviewed, I decided that I’m definitely waiting because the next generation NV40 should be what the original 5800ultra was supposed to be, that’s for sure. Ati has got great cards also, but the new Nvidia cards will put Ati back in second place, where they always were when it comes to computer games and graphics. “As it was in the beginning, so shall it be in the end.”
    Please feel free to post your comments on this matter. By Treez
    Email me: hyperdrive2004@yahoo.com

    My personal Rigg
    Soyo Clear Acrylic Case 8 fans 500watt pwrsupply
    A7N8X Deluxe2.0 (All Air Cooled)
    AMD Athlon XP2500+ (Overclocked 3200+)
    512MB PC2700 DDR333 SDRAM (Overclocked 400)
    PNY Geforce FX5800 Ultra (Core 526Mhz x 1.13Ghz)
    SoundBlaster Audigy2 LS
    80.0 Gig Seagate Barracuda SATA 7,200rpm 8MB
    2 x 120.0Gig Seagate Barracuda ATA 133 7,200rpm 8MB
    Iomega 4X DVD+-DVDRW
    LG 48X24X48 CDRW/DVD
    Windows XP Professional SP1

    UT FLYBY 1024x768
    215.276108
    UT BOTMATCH
    84.162865

    UT FLYBY 1280x960 4x 8x
    86.456459
    UTBOTMATCH
    53.564590

    3Dmark2001SE 16,529
    3Dmark2003 6,021
  • croc_croc_ New
    edited February 2004
    treez wrote:
    .

    You can't really say anything until both ATi's and Nvidia's new chips are released. I am not biased to either company, but look at what you jsut said about NV40 and look at what happened with the FX series and the hype behind that "supposed" Radeon killer. I think its safe to say only that both of the new chips are going to kick @$$.

    edit: I also remember Nvidia saying awhile back that they would be shifting more towards their chipset development, and not so much the gpu development. I guess they changed their minds?
  • treeztreez
    edited February 2004
    croc, nvidia has bigger engineers than ati in the business, and besides this is the only way that they could take back their spot, by producing a superior product to Ati, for real
  • croc_croc_ New
    edited February 2004
    treez wrote:
    croc, nvidia has bigger engineers than ati in the business, and besides this is the only way that they could take back their spot, by producing a superior product to Ati, for real

    They do indeed, and yet they still managed to make a crap product. They sorta cleared that up by releasing the 5900's, but it was a little too late. Maybe now they will get it right the first time.
  • FantasmaFantasma
    edited May 2004
    My score is about 4200 in a radeon 9500 pro overclocked, and an athlon xp 1800+ to 2200+
  • floppybootstompfloppybootstomp Greenwich New
    edited May 2004
    ATI 9800 Pro; 4.4 Drivers; Stock speeds:
  • floppybootstompfloppybootstomp Greenwich New
    edited May 2004
    FX5900; 56.64 Forceware Drivers; 1st pic stock, 2nd pic overclocked to 5950 speeds:
  • AnimalAnimal
    edited May 2004
    stock everything;

    2500+
    NF7-s
    512 3200
    9800 pro
  • Gumby76vGumby76v Austin
    edited July 2004
    um I win no?
  • GnomeWizarddGnomeWizardd Member 4 Life Akron, PA Icrontian
    edited July 2004
    please post specs of system. I have a A64 3400+ with a radeon 9800xt and i get 7k to get 10k u better have a X800 or a 6800 ( which I will be getting shortly )
Sign In or Register to comment.