SM-Bytes idea!

2»

Comments

  • ShortyShorty Manchester, UK Icrontian
    edited February 2004
    Necropolis_UK wrote:
    Erm, Shorty... its pulling deleted threads into the bytes.
    Actually, its pulling deleted posts :p

    I have fixed the query anyway, to not bother with deleted posts. Oops my bad.

    All fixed now, move along, nothing to see here now...
  • ThraxThrax 🐌 Austin, TX Icrontian
    edited February 2004
    I still don't like it!
  • primesuspectprimesuspect Beepin n' Boopin Detroit, MI Icrontian
    edited February 2004
    haven't we gotten rid of this guy yet? Somebody call security....
  • LincLinc Owner Detroit Icrontian
    edited February 2004
    I dunno... I think I gotta agree with Thrax :werr: Not as good as I thought it would be. I just think it should be updated more often instead.
  • NecropolisNecropolis Hawarden, Wales Icrontian
    edited February 2004
    Thrax wrote:
    I still don't like it!

    As the Russians say Toughski Sh!tski ;D.

    But seriously I like the idea. We just need to add alot more new SM bytes so we dont see the same stuff over and over again.
  • edcentricedcentric near Milwaukee, Wisconsin Icrontian
    edited February 2004
    Maybe we should run the date in the corner so people can tell if it is a 'new' or a 'classic'.
    Thax, you sound like a little girl, get over it.
Sign In or Register to comment.