Options

NV40 3DMark 2003 scores

Unknown
edited April 2004 in Science & Tech
NV40 3DMark 2003 scores revealed

[blockquote]Numerous sources have confirmed that a Futuremark 3DMark 2003 score of 12,535 has apparently been demonstrated by Nvidia on its pre-production engineering samples.

To put this in perspective, this story is brought to you by a tweaked AMD Athlon 64 FX system based on a Gigabyte GA-K8NNXP-940 mainboard with 1GB of Corsair XMS DDR, and is equipped with the current king of 3D gaming cards, an ATI Radeon 9800XT. This rock steady, real-world system benches a strong 7382 under 3DMark 2003 Build 340 at default settings.

Squatting on top of Futuremark's Top 20 'Hall of Fame'ous willy wavers is a heavily overclocked 4.5GHz P4 – seeming to need freezing to -85ºC to attain this frequency - with a well overclocked ATi Radeon 9800XT. This system, apparently, marks up a score of 10,008.[/blockquote]

More at [link=http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=15169]The Inquirer[/link]

Comments

  • Geeky1Geeky1 University of the Pacific (Stockton, CA, USA)
    edited April 2004
    Hmm. The new chips from nVidia and ATi are both 16 pipelines thom right? If so, the performance is about what I'd expect. Now let's just hope the R420 is faster.
  • TheSmJTheSmJ
    edited April 2004
    I have a feeling it will be...
  • CyrixInsteadCyrixInstead Stoke-on-Trent, England Icrontian
    edited April 2004
    Wow!

    ~Cyrix
  • Omega65Omega65 Philadelphia, Pa
    edited April 2004
    from the article
    In back rooms at the CeBIT Messe, we heard talk of 3DMark03 scores of "over 10,000 3DMarks" for both ATI's R420 and Nvidia's NV40 but, for various reasons, we weren't particularly confident in our source. However, in light of today's news, we'll mention that that same source said that the ATI R420 was somewhat slower, though "not by much".

    Sources close to ATI have said that a score of 10,000 3DMarks for ATi R420 "would be a dream", indicating that R420 Revision: CeBIT 2K4 wasn't pulling this level of numbers.

    BTW Geeky1 the R420 has 12 pipelines
  • KingFishKingFish
    edited April 2004
    whoa, I want one. I'm kinda glad I held off on buying a vid card for now.

    KingFish
  • RWBRWB Icrontian
    edited April 2004
    hrm... if only my current card wasn't so buggy, I hope these come soon cuase I'll be wanting a 3rd PC here soon ;)
  • mmonninmmonnin Centreville, VA
    edited April 2004
    OK I checked the motherboard and it has AGP 8X which means the ATI one will probably be AGP as well. If so and something else works out for me I will prolly get an R420. I hoping that I can use for what I want and it will kick ass at it.
  • drasnordrasnor Starship Operator Hawthorne, CA Icrontian
    edited April 2004
    Is that nVidia score before or after the "driver optimizations"?

    -drasnor :fold:
  • ThraxThrax 🐌 Austin, TX Icrontian
    edited April 2004
    Exactly Drasnor.

    I don't see why people are particularly hyped about nVidia 3DMark scores, it's akin to not suspecting the only jewel thief in the city when a jewelry store is robbed.
  • RWBRWB Icrontian
    edited April 2004
    Was ATi not accused of doing the same?
  • mmonninmmonnin Centreville, VA
    edited April 2004
    Not nearly as many times as nvidia. Their scores change drastically when using different drivers.
  • MedlockMedlock Miramar, Florida Member
    edited April 2004
    That's awesome. I'm sure the R420 will own it though. :rockon:
  • mmonninmmonnin Centreville, VA
    edited April 2004
    Well from what this says it has Full 16 pipelines while ATI only has 12.:(
  • EyesOnlyEyesOnly Sweden New
    edited April 2004
    More is not always better. Remember Intel - AMD, David & Goliath, ...you know what i mean. :D
  • Omega65Omega65 Philadelphia, Pa
    edited April 2004
    In any event - I'm looking forward to a 500mhz R420 video card :respect:
  • TemplarTemplar You first.
    edited April 2004
    Damn. Can't get a new card without a job :X
  • ThraxThrax 🐌 Austin, TX Icrontian
    edited April 2004
    FACT: R420 has 16 pipelines

    FUD-B-GONE.
  • Omega65Omega65 Philadelphia, Pa
    edited April 2004
    It seems ATI may have the ability to scale the R420/423 chip up and down (16, 12, 8? pipelines) according to need. Of course we wont really know until the 26th

    From Tech-Report
    Next-gen ATI bumped to 16 pixel pipes?


    Clubic is reporting (Google translation here), that ATI will introduce a next-gen graphics chip with 16 pixel pipelines. Previous reports had R420 rolling out with 12 pipelines, but ATI may feel they need a few extra pipelines to compete with NV40.

    According to our information architecture ' scalable' of R420 makes it possible during manufacture to privilege the yield (output/a number of chips functional and exploitable at exit of factory) or numbers it pixel pipelines. The chip of the R420 family (can be R423?) who comprises 16 pipes will be thus produced in small quantity and will address himself mainly to the top-of-the-range market. Let us add to that that this version 16 pipes of R4xx will be available in AGP 8x or PCI-Express train 16x.

    If this is the case, it's probably only a matter of time before someone figures out how to unlock dormant pipelines in R420.
  • Omega65Omega65 Philadelphia, Pa
    edited April 2004
    From Anandtech Tech Update R420

    [blockquote]Update April 9, 2004:

    We just received confirmation that X800 Pro (Due Apr 26th) and SE will run on 12 pipelines. Radeon X800 XT, (Due May 31st) on the other hand, will run on 16 pipelines. It is important to note that all three of these chips are based on the same R420/R423 core. ATI could have an overclocker's/softmodder's dream with the X800 Pro and SE derivaties![/blockquote]
Sign In or Register to comment.