hyperthreading rules!
TheBaron
Austin, TX
currently running 2 instances of FAH
the first instance was getting 7 min/ frame
on a gromac (the console wont let me scroll far enough to see what it was). i then opened a second instance, which began folding a P638_L939_K12m_ext tinker. the first instance continues folding at 7 min/frame, while the new one starts with 8 min/ frame.
this is the shizzy
btw
p4 2.8c
abit is7
512 pc3500 corsair on "street racer" setting, F1 was giving me memory bsod's
the first instance was getting 7 min/ frame
on a gromac (the console wont let me scroll far enough to see what it was). i then opened a second instance, which began folding a P638_L939_K12m_ext tinker. the first instance continues folding at 7 min/frame, while the new one starts with 8 min/ frame.
this is the shizzy
btw
p4 2.8c
abit is7
512 pc3500 corsair on "street racer" setting, F1 was giving me memory bsod's
0
Comments
i dont know if that makes any sense, but 5-7 mins a frame is pretty good regardless of full CPU load or not. also, the second instance does not change my load temp at all
I'm runnin 4 clients hyperthreaded on my dual Xeon rig and kicking some major genome butt...
Lovin the Xeons...
"g"
I have an Intel 3.0 HT and I cannot get it to run 2 instances at the same time. Also, the one only takes 50% of the processor... any ideas how you got it to run?
when i'm running 1 it says 100%
TheBaron: Thats what HT is supposed to do. The OS things it has to logical drives instead of one. It improves on multitasking since the OS thinks there are 2 CPUs it can send 2 sets of tasks to the CPU to make sure it is utalized as much as possible, or at least better than w/o HT. Some programs and benches, HT actually worsen performance.
i know, i was just trying to be clear
thanks all
If this doesn't work can someone tell me why?
Different folders, different service names, different machine ID, and -local.