Napster Rises From The Ashes
Spinner
Birmingham, UK
The peer-to-peer debate has suddenly had to deal with a whole new angle this week, as news hits the world that Naptser (the P2P music service which was closed down in 2001) is to make its return. However, the service which this time will be headed up by Roxio (which bought Napster's assests last year for around £3m), will work on a subscription based system. As of yet there is no information as to how much the service will cost, but it looks set to become one of the largest legal music catalogues in the world.
This news I imagine will only heat up the debate surrounding peer-to-peer services, but personally I feel this is the sort of news both the music industry and the online music lover needs in order to find a middle ground in this continuing battle between the RIAA and non-legit P2P users.
The full report:
http://www.vnunet.com/News/1142656
This news I imagine will only heat up the debate surrounding peer-to-peer services, but personally I feel this is the sort of news both the music industry and the online music lover needs in order to find a middle ground in this continuing battle between the RIAA and non-legit P2P users.
The full report:
http://www.vnunet.com/News/1142656
0
Comments
That's not really a big factor. Shipping and handling, whether performed by machine or hand, is expensive. The actual hardware costs of sleeves and the disks is miniscule, as compared to the total cost of mass producing commercially recorded CDs.
Industry savings potentially could be immense, as server downloads would be the ultimate in efficiency.
I think eventually there will be a viable online purchase-subscribe-share system that will, for the most part, make retail sales second tier.
"What would you pay to have a downloadable, high-quality, total selection music service?"
I know I'd pay 30-40$ dollars a month which is well more than I ever spent on CDs even when I was buying them regularly.
I'm not adverse to that. That's a reasonable fee.