Athlon 64 90nm Review

Omega65Omega65 Philadelphia, Pa
edited October 2004 in Science & Tech
Translated link HKepc.com - Athlon 64 3500+ 90nm Review

Some interesting temps.....

<table border="1"><tr><td></td><td>Winchester 3500+ 90nm</td><td>New Castle 3500+ 130nm</td></tr>
<tr><td>Idle</td><td>41.6C</td><td>37.2C</td></tr>
<tr><td>3DMark03 @ 20Mins</td><td>62.2C</td><td>57.8C</td></tr>
<tr><td>CPUBurn 4 @ 20mins</td><td>67.4C</td><td>62.7C</td></tr></table>

Source: HKEPC.com

Comments

  • Geeky1Geeky1 University of the Pacific (Stockton, CA, USA)
    edited September 2004
    And this is interesting...why?

    //EDIT
    That came out sounding harsher than I meant it to. What I meant is "why are these temps surprising?"
  • ketoketo Occupied. Or is it preoccupied? Icrontian
    edited September 2004
    Some people may not know that AMD *appear* to be having the same heat dissipation problems as the Intel bunch, as they migrate to a smaller process (90mm).
  • Geeky1Geeky1 University of the Pacific (Stockton, CA, USA)
    edited September 2004
    Well, first, the heat dissipation issues that the Prescott has are not nearly the problem that everyone has made them out to be, and the Athlon doesn't seem to have a major problem either. The only company that really appears to be having issues right now is IBM.

    Regardless, this was to be expected. It's a byproduct of moving to a 0.09 micron process.
  • mmonninmmonnin Centreville, VA
    edited September 2004
    Moving to 90nm isnt going to be the same as it was to 180nm or 130nm. The smaller and smaller you get the more leakage. That is Intels problem. AMD is using SOI which helps with the leakage. With less leakage there isnt the need to increase the current like Intel had to.

    Looks like AMD was able capitalize on the die shrink like in previous die shrinks unlike Intel.
  • muddocktormuddocktor
    edited September 2004
    What I find interesting is that reading in the translated article, it appears that these first 90 nm A64's don't have SSE3 extentions. From what I gather in the translated version, which is kind of scrambled to say the least, is that we won't see SSE3 support to rev. E 90 nm A64. If there is no support for SSE3, then there's no reason to even consider these early 90 nm procs as they probably won't overclock any better than the present 130 nm parts and the 90 nm procs run hotter than present procs too.
  • YeCKeL
    edited October 2004
    May see the Winchester core obviously compared to the NewCastle old core hot 1., but differs certainly is not very big, probably only some 3-4 distinction, looked like changes over to 90 奈 rice although obviously can make the K8 processor temperature rise, but actually has not liked Intel Prescott to be fearful, believed is when Athlon 64 itself the arteries are not certainly high, after therefore changes over to 90 奈 rice certainly not to appear the too big leakage like Intel.
  • blackstar
    edited October 2004
    what do you guys expect?
    higher temps on a .9 chip dont mean it is "having problems" - it means there is less surface area to dissipate the heat that is produced.

    intel's prescott also doesnt show any problems with their .9 process either - its a massive long piped chip, and as such is going to be less energy efficient. its not necessarily their process. look at their dothan. the same process, not hot. ergo, no problems with intel's process and not necessarily any problems with amds either.

    you can see the reduction in amd's power use over 130nm by checking google, techreport is one such site that pops up.
Sign In or Register to comment.