M-Audio card
GnomeWizardd
Member 4 LifeAkron, PA Icrontian
Ill never buy another type of sound card than M-Audio.
This card is great. Great sound easy to install drivers.
The M-Audio revolution 5.1 gets two thumbs up.
This card is great. Great sound easy to install drivers.
The M-Audio revolution 5.1 gets two thumbs up.
0
Comments
I just wish it would output on its digital coax line ALL the time, instead of during DVDs. Not that serious of a problem, though
Good for audiophiles, suck for gamers
PS: I have a Delta too (44)
Good enough for me
All us old pharts with e-machines are keeping the requirements on the software down.
Guess I'll go crank up the A64 3800+ and play a little solitare while I listen to Elvis in the background
The REVO is a darn good card. I have it powering my home theater PC connected to the AMP. Nice sound. The feature I wish they had was the ability to send stereo to fronts and rears...like having 2 sets of FRONT speakers.
Example...when I have a party...the circle surround is nice but the ability to send music and control volume to the fronts AND the same signal to the rears...overriding the "surround" effect would be nice. It allows for music to be all around instead of a centralized source.
But 3 thumbs up from me on this card overall.
X3 Surround. It seems exactly the same, if not better sounding, than using Stereo x2 on the speaker control. Unless you mean something else?
Not that I'm trying to be a deliberate downer but personally I'd wait a while and see how well the new ppl in charge do before buying any of their products, I'd hate to buy a card that suddenly lost regular driver updates and things.
Avid is a great company. I forsee good things for m-audio support.
I hope that M-Audio continues to be a good solid sound alternative to the cards offered by Creative, a little diversity is good for the consumer in that it offers more competition to spur improvements in designs and also lower prices as each company tries to trump the other one.
No competition means that you're forced to buy what brand "x" sells for the price they decide they want to sell it for which is a bad thing. For an example of that look at the OS market. If there was an easy to use, for the average user, OS alternative to Windows that cost considerably less M$ would have to lower prices, but, as it stands with Linux up in the air as to it's legitamacy and the fact it's not quite as easy to use (although it's largely free) M$ has a chokehold on the mass-consumer market and it shows. They churn out a product that could be better and charge an exhorbitant sum for it because they know people will pay it or, by and large, have a pc that is of no use to them for anything other than a paperweight.
Tex
There's a solution to this... run 2 CPUs in your gaming rig