Sm_24
BuddyJ
Dept. of PropagandaOKC Icrontian
Okay, so things haven't been going so smoothly with mah baby. SM_24 was moved to a new location so it's been down for the time. Which sucked. So I went to put in a new wireless network card (Belkin $35 walmart special) and it got cranky. I mean really cranky. Like BSOD stop errors on boot up. Tried to fix it in the recovery console per M$'s instructions- nach. Didn't work.
So my brother-in-law and I will install Gentoo this week and make it all better. Nothing beats a good re-format.
So in short:
SM_24 is down
SM_24 is being fixed
SM_24 will return to full-time non-stop 24/7 dual processor folding in no time!
So my brother-in-law and I will install Gentoo this week and make it all better. Nothing beats a good re-format.
So in short:
SM_24 is down
SM_24 is being fixed
SM_24 will return to full-time non-stop 24/7 dual processor folding in no time!
0
Comments
You may also want to consider prime's Folding on Linux guide if gentoo doesn't want to play nice.
-drasnor
Nick, the bro-in-law, is a Gentoo nut. I think we shouldn't have any major problem getting it to work nicely.
When I get off work tonight, I'd think that should be done and we can start the kernel.
Sounds like nerd paradise.
Got Gentoo rollin' with folding on both processors, plus Enlightenment and Firefox for those moments when you just need things to look pretty. Can't wait to see if the new "tuned" OS helps bust out any more points.
It was common knowledge a while back. Most people if they made them dedicated folding machines would actually run it through Wine to try and get some of the lost performance back. No idea if the client has improved since then though...
Buddy J, do you mind if we monitor the output over the next month or two to see what difference there is (if any) in performance using current clients? I just took some screenshots of the EOC stats for SM_24 up to this point; we could revisit this issue after there is enough data under Linux for a fair comparison.
Of course, we'd have to take into account the project's current point/unit status. If Stanford starts flooding the project with low point units, the average score may be a bit low.
http://www.rose-hulman.edu/~hanusaem/FAHlog.txt
http://www.rose-hulman.edu/~hanusaem/FAHlog-Prev.txt
-drasnor
Good point. It seems to me they run in waves on about a 2-3 week cycle. This should cover enough time for a reasonably accurate comparison: