firewall protection, or over-protected?
I have a question about what combination of firewalls is approporiate, and which are redundant or not needed.
I have a PC with windows XP Pro. So it comes with the windows firewall. I know this is only inbound protection. So I can install Zone Alarm and get protection both ways. Does this mean I should disable the windows XP firewall? Or does that not really matter? Will having 2 firewalls slow my connection down a bit?
And then what my DSL Router. It has a hardware firewall built-in. Is that protection enough for outbound, such that I don't need to install Zone Alarm? I'm not big on adding more software to the PC than absolutely necessary.
So which combination of these three things makes the most sense:
- windows XP firewall
- Zone Alarm
- D-link router DI-704 with firewall
???? I'm confused!!!!
-Max
I have a PC with windows XP Pro. So it comes with the windows firewall. I know this is only inbound protection. So I can install Zone Alarm and get protection both ways. Does this mean I should disable the windows XP firewall? Or does that not really matter? Will having 2 firewalls slow my connection down a bit?
And then what my DSL Router. It has a hardware firewall built-in. Is that protection enough for outbound, such that I don't need to install Zone Alarm? I'm not big on adding more software to the PC than absolutely necessary.
So which combination of these three things makes the most sense:
- windows XP firewall
- Zone Alarm
- D-link router DI-704 with firewall
???? I'm confused!!!!
-Max
0
Comments
I would leave the ZA and drop the windows firewall. If your an installed app nazi, then reverse the statement either is fine for most.
If it helps once in two years, it was worth it in my opinion and the ZA shouldn't get in the way too much. Yes, this is the exception to "virtually no need" but that's where I always seem to get bitten.
It should not affect your network speed enough to notice.
If it is legitimate, then why is it a bother?