Intel’s next generation

2»

Comments

  • profdlpprofdlp The Holy City Of Westlake, Ohio
    edited April 2007
    Leonardo wrote:
    Is that really that much different than Intel in the last couple years?...
    Very good points.

    I do think part of Intel's struggles in the couple of years before their latest resurgence may well have been tied to the socket shifts you describe. The chief difference I see is that AMD users tend to be more budget-conscious. Intel had their built-in advantage with the large brand name manufacturers to tide them over. AMD is finding out the hard way that without strong support from individual enthusiasts they are in trouble. The current upgrade options are simply not too appealing for many of us with what was a great system just a year or two ago. :-/
  • LeonardoLeonardo Wake up and smell the glaciers Eagle River, Alaska Icrontian
    edited April 2007
    Good point. Socket 939 is DDR and AGP, is that correct? If so, that would be a very big difference when comparing the transition of Intel 478-LGA775-newer LGA775 to AMD Socket A-939-AM2. Intel went from AGP and DDR to PCIe and DDR2 when Socket 478 ended. Those upgrading from first edition LGA775 to the newer version don't need to acquire new video cards and memory.
  • mmonninmmonnin Centreville, VA
    edited April 2007
    939 has PCI-E, at least my NF4 does.

    The early Socket 775 boards not being able to support C2D has to just be voltages/chipset upgrades. I have 939 and I have to upgrade the core of my system minus the video card. Socket A lasted forever....I upgraded a part at a time in those days.

    I finally have a C2D System on order and it wont be long before DDR3 starts rolling out and I will only be able to make minor CPU upgrades and some GPU upgrades. Motherboard and RAM will have to be done together. Who knows, probably a PSU for ATX3.0 or something....
  • profdlpprofdlp The Holy City Of Westlake, Ohio
    edited April 2007
    mmonnin wrote:
    939 has PCI-E, at least my NF4 does...
    The later Socket 939 boards mostly had PCI-E, but the early and mid boards didn't. I'm on the "didn't" side, myself. :(
    ...Socket A lasted forever....I upgraded a part at a time in those days...
    Exactly. They could have milked Socket 939 the same way and sold a heck of a lot more CPU's.
  • mmonninmmonnin Centreville, VA
    edited April 2007
    AM2 has how many pins? 939 in just a different configuration? Its been awhile.....
  • a2jfreaka2jfreak Houston, TX Member
    edited April 2007
    Yep. DDR2 rather than DDR, so some of the pin mappings changed. Still 939 though.
    mmonnin wrote:
    AM2 has how many pins? 939 in just a different configuration? Its been awhile.....
  • RyderRyder Kalamazoo, Mi Icrontian
    edited May 2007
    AM2 is 940 like the older server CPU's
  • a2jfreaka2jfreak Houston, TX Member
    edited May 2007
    You're correct. I mistakenly thought AM2 had 939 pins.
    RyderOCZ wrote:
    AM2 is 940 like the older server CPU's
  • mmonninmmonnin Centreville, VA
    edited May 2007
    Eh...make em the same.... wire 2 grounds together and you have yourself DDR2 with s939. :)
Sign In or Register to comment.