whats slow is prolly the 8megs on onboard memory..no offense...but i think that it being slow has nothing to do with winxp drivers....just not enough vram
hey i'm offened, hehe j/k
i installed it on a scrap computer i just put together, mainly folding, and my parents lite usage. what i mean by slow was when draging windows, it' leaves a nice trials. hehe
WuGgaRoO had this to say whats slow is prolly the 8megs on onboard memory..no offense...but i think that it being slow has nothing to do with winxp drivers....just not enough vram
leishi85 had this to say hey i'm offened, hehe j/k
i installed it on a scrap computer i just put together, mainly folding, and my parents lite usage. what i mean by slow was when draging windows, it' leaves a nice trials. hehe
yeah thatll happen...u need ATLEAST 16megs for that not to happen....troost me
i don;t think it's the vram, i have had computer with intergrated 2mb video ram, that i can drag windows and whatnot without trails, and felt faster than this.
0
Geeky1University of the Pacific (Stockton, CA, USA)
edited November 2003
The windows drivers are a good part of what's making it slow, guys. The Rage 128 drivers that Microsoft provides with XP do not support OpenGL or D3D hardware acceleration. Trust me on this one... I had a P3-600 Laptop with an 8MB Rage Mobility. In '98, it ran most everything decently. In XP, it couldn't play Tron @ 320x240 @ the lowest detail settings at more than 10-15fps.
Comments
http://www.ati.com/support/products/pc/rageiic/rageiicdrivers.html
i installed it on a scrap computer i just put together, mainly folding, and my parents lite usage. what i mean by slow was when draging windows, it' leaves a nice trials. hehe
Thanks for saying what I was thinking.
yeah thatll happen...u need ATLEAST 16megs for that not to happen....troost me
Just a thought.