toggle menu
Icrontic
Categories
Discussions
Best of Icrontic
Sign In
·
Register
Sign In
·
Register
Categories
Discussions
Activity
Best of Icrontic
Sign In
·
Register
×
Home
›
Science & Tech
›
Hardware
Discussion
2700+ vs. 2800+
Title
Author
Category
(All)
Announcements
Gaming
Team Fortress 2
World of Warcraft
Minecraft
Civilization
Backlog of Shame
Science & Tech
Hardware
Internet & Media
Lifestyle
Movies & TV
Music
Style
Food & Drink
Fitness
Home & Auto
Community
Events
Trading Post
Folding@Home
search subcategories
search archived
Tags
What to search
discussions
comments
polls
Date within
1 day
3 days
1 week
2 weeks
1 month
2 months
6 months
1 year
of
Examples: Monday, today, last week, Mar 26, 3/26/04
Search
2700+ vs. 2800+
fudgam
Upstate New York
November 2003
edited November 2003
in
Hardware
Why does the 2800+ cost more and have a lower clock speed? I noticed that 2800+ has a barton core so Im guessing thats why. Are the barton cores alot better than the Thoroughbred cores?
0
Comments
fudgam
Upstate New York
November 2003
edited November 2003
At newegg atleast
0
Geeky1
University of the Pacific (Stockton, CA, USA)
November 2003
edited November 2003
The Barton core has 512k of L2 cache. The Tbred core has 256. Hence, the Barton outperforms a somewhat higher clocked Tbred.
0
Al_Capown
Indiana
November 2003
edited November 2003
Barton cores have 512k L2 cache, where as Throughbreds have 256.
0
fudgam
Upstate New York
November 2003
edited November 2003
Got ya. Barton it is then
0
Infidel
Germany
November 2003
edited November 2003
I wonder if the larger cache makes much of a real world performance difference.
Infidel
0
Geeky1
University of the Pacific (Stockton, CA, USA)
November 2003
edited November 2003
It makes a bigger difference than the miniscule bump in clockspeed does...
0
Sign In
or
Register
to comment.
Comments
Infidel