AMD 3GHz K10 breaks 30,000 in 3DMark06
Sledgehammer70
California Icrontian
Benchmarks have finally been found for AMD's new K10 architecture processor. Barcelona, which is due to ship in less than two weeks. The chip in the test was a mighty 2.5GHz Agena FX and was running with a pair of 2900XT cards. While the test was brief, they were able to overclock the chip to 3GHz and shattered the 3DMark06 top score, breaching the 30,000+ mark.
Their testing was cut short because their vehicle was broken into and the setup (along with thousands of dollars of camera equipment and laptops) was stolen. However, this early bench, if accurate, makes it sound like AMD's new K10 architecture is going to be a home run for the company.
Their testing was cut short because their vehicle was broken into and the setup (along with thousands of dollars of camera equipment and laptops) was stolen. However, this early bench, if accurate, makes it sound like AMD's new K10 architecture is going to be a home run for the company.
0
Comments
I struggle on a daily basis to keep from buying the Q6600.
I certainly hope so- the story is a little thin if it has just moxie and no evidence.
My son's eagerness, the long product wait and what I think will be the initial consumer price of the Barcelona is what pushed me to get the Q6600 @ $300 last month.
Their analysis and speculation is sometimes off; in such cases their articles will make it fairly clear that such is indeed speculation and/or analysis.
The dog ate my homework...in Leipzig...before I could take pictures. Maybe so. We'll see.
Theo did have his laptop, several USB Drives, a CPU or two, and a load of expensive photog gear stolen out of the back of his VW. Window smashed and all, the proof could have gone out the window
That went out with the 90s- my teenagers used it up.
I'm not sure why AMD has pushed things out so far. Personally- I think they are dangerously close to missing their window of opportunity- much like the 2xxx series video cards.
The reasons I've seen have more to do with supply chain and availability than anything else. If thatβs the case, however, by the time it shows up everywhere, is anyone going to
1. see a worthwhile performance difference?
2. afford it?
3. care?
Also, the battle seems so caught up in the server market, that I've lost sight of any relevant AMD information pertaining to the rest of us (in the consumer market). I'm sorry, I personally just can't get excited about $1-2000 enterprise level silicon.
I WILL say that AMD desperately needed some solid good news and I think this article might have helped their stock go up +5% today.
While Intel has been a price leader in the server CPU market, I'm still not sure about the $erver motherboards, the regi$tered RAM, the pin-mod overclocking, etc. I found when I tried to price-kit together a Cloverton 2-CPU. Still, I've got to admit, the above is better than what I thought.
The article I saw was this, and it's a little scary to think of 4 of these on top of the cost of the necessary system you would need to run them on.
Regardless, my thought is if AMD has any clear performance edge, you're not going to see bargain prices like those out of them.