Any gain going from Tbred to Barton in F@H
Ultra-Nexus
Buenos Aires, ARG
Hey there!
I`m wondering how much of a difference does the extra 256kb of cache makes at the same real clock as a Tbred in folding performance...
Any one knows? Any articles about this?
Thanks
I`m wondering how much of a difference does the extra 256kb of cache makes at the same real clock as a Tbred in folding performance...
Any one knows? Any articles about this?
Thanks
0
Comments
The fold speeds seem to exactly track with the speed.
Hey for $40 I'll take the lower heat levels.
your answer doesn't seems to relate to the question, he was asking about barton and tbred, not tbird and tbred.
I thought the barton's were doing 400mhz? Thats really only an advantage if you don't OC the tbred...
I think that if the memory used exceeds 256 then the Barton can help, so long as 512K isn't greatly exceeded. If the data currently fits nicely into 256K then there will not be much/any difference.
Anyone know if F@H fits inside the L2 of the T-Bred(B)s? Or does it take a Barton? Or does it overflow both?
It depends on how new it it, my barton 2500+ is a 333, but the new 3200 is a 400. I'm not sure about the rest of the bartons though.
Thats what I am asking?