primesuspect wrote: who would say no to this, honestly?
fatcat wrote: CB
UPSLynx wrote: The only stipulation, I would suggest, is if it does in fact throw flames.
Keebler wrote: No flames in tent pls
Cyclonite wrote: There better be flames. I don't think we can classify it as a flamethrower if it is not throwing flames. Bring on the FIRE!
StainMeNow wrote: Oh..they'll be plenty of flames in my tent...
UPSLynx wrote: Just please keep GQ away from this thing...
fatcat wrote:
Comments
CB
Bwhahaha... :Pwned:
Oh yes, it does throw flames.
Oh..they'll be plenty of flames in my tent...
fun governor!
unless its in your tent....
Use more lube.
I'm the one who convinced him to put up the poll about bringing it.
Do want flamethrower.