Just bought two new gfx boards... what kind of performance can I expect?
I just ordered two new (refurbished) graphics cards from newegg; one as a backup, and the other to upgrade the Rage 128 in my print server.
Since I know someone's going to ask...
Why not use the Rage 128 as a backup?
It's an AGP 2x card; it won't work in my nForce2 boards.
So, I ordered a Transcend Radeon 7500/64MB DDR, and a Transcend Radeon 9000/64MB DDR.
What kind of performance (3dmark '01) are we looking at here?
It's not really a big deal... I just want something a bit faster for the print server because I notice the R128 lagging @ 1600x1200 in 2d sometimes, and because I want to run a higher resolution than that anyhow...
But, I'm curious.
I'm guessing ~3-6k for the 7500, depending on the comp. it's in; my R7500m in my laptop does 5300, so...
As for the R9000... I'd guess 7-9k, depending again on the comp. it's in.
What do you guys think?
Since I know someone's going to ask...
Why not use the Rage 128 as a backup?
It's an AGP 2x card; it won't work in my nForce2 boards.
So, I ordered a Transcend Radeon 7500/64MB DDR, and a Transcend Radeon 9000/64MB DDR.
What kind of performance (3dmark '01) are we looking at here?
It's not really a big deal... I just want something a bit faster for the print server because I notice the R128 lagging @ 1600x1200 in 2d sometimes, and because I want to run a higher resolution than that anyhow...
But, I'm curious.
I'm guessing ~3-6k for the 7500, depending on the comp. it's in; my R7500m in my laptop does 5300, so...
As for the R9000... I'd guess 7-9k, depending again on the comp. it's in.
What do you guys think?
0
Comments
In stock state, it was more like high 7ks-low 9ks on a 1.4-1.8GHz Athlon/Athlon XP system.
You realize that I bought the 8500 a month after it came out, and I had a 1.4GHz T-Bird system to put it in, right?
They both come clocked near 250/200 (core/ram); the R7500 is actually 258MHz core, and I can't complain about that.
The RAM (Transcend brand) on both cards also overclocked fairly happily to 250MHz; there was no artifacting in 3dmark '01 @ 250/250 with the 9000, and only very, very, VERY minor artifacting with the 7500.
Anyhow, at the default speeds, in my NF7-S (which happened to be the most accessible system, since it's out of the case for testing purposes right now), with the 1800 @ 2.2GHz, the scores are:
R7500: ~5600
R9000: ~7400
Not bad... not outstanding, but the R7500 is faster than I was expecting. The R9000, on the other hand... eh. I'm a bit unhappy with it. Not enough to send it back... I mean, for $40, it was a great deal, but my R8500 is a lot faster. The 8500 is a much better card though, too, so...