Intel upgrade questions for you P4 users? Will order soon.

muddocktormuddocktor
edited December 2003 in Hardware
OK, it's been 2 years since I seriously dabbled with any Intel silicon but I just got a $500 Christmas bonus from the company I work for and it's burning a hole in my pocket. I've been thinking about building a 800 fsb P4 system for a while and this should be enough to get me going. This is what I've picked out so far; give me some feedback on my choices please.:)

mobo - Abit IC7G Max2 - $138.99
proc - P4 2.4/800 retail - $166.00
memory - Corsair XMS4000LL 2 sticks @ $60 ea - $120
heatsink - Thermalright SLK800U - already have gotten for Christmas:D
Fan - Vantec Tornado - $9.99
Fan controler - Vantec Nexus NXP205 - $16.99

Shipping - $9.00

Total - $460.97

All prices from Newegg.

What do you all think of this setup? This will have an AIW9800Pro and a 80 gig WD JB drive, which I already have.
«1

Comments

  • GHoosdumGHoosdum Icrontian
    edited December 2003
    Sounds good... but I didn't think the 2.4 had HT, and I didn't think that it was worth getting a P4 over an AMD unless it was 2.8GHz and up and had HT...?
  • ThraxThrax 🐌 Austin, TX Icrontian
    edited December 2003
    For the life of me, I can't find an IC7G Max2. Not even on Abit's site.

    Are you sure you don't mean Abit IC7G, or IC7-MAX3? Did you maybe squash board names together by mistake? As far as motherboards are concerned, the IC7G and the MAX3 are the best available for Intel.

    CPU is good.
    Memory is VERY good.
    Heatsink is fine.
    Fan: Good, but the Thermaltake SmartFan II is almost as good, but allows you to control the speed by potentiometer. It would negate the fanbus if you're only getting it for the vantec.
  • NoFutureNoFuture In a 3D world...
    edited December 2003
    I think the 2.6C is the same price as the 2.4C so you should get this one unless you found a kickass stepping for OC.
  • muddocktormuddocktor
    edited December 2003
    This is a link to that board's spec page, Thrax. I believe it's the earlier version of the Max boards and Newegg must be trying to clear out inventory of them, for it to be priced that low. I believe the Max2 doesn't have the updated southbridge with the integrated sata support like the Max3 does. All it has is the SI sata chip.

    I thought about going with the TT fan with it and I have a couple of them and know how well they perform, but I do like the focusing vanes used on the Tornado, as well as the high performance Delta fans. I think that they give a little better flow rate and static air pressure than a regular type fan like the TT. Since it will still fit in the budget going with the Tornado and the Nexus, I figured I'd go that route.

    Also, the 2.6/800 is only $172.00, which is $6.00 more than the 2.4/800. Do you think that I should go with that instead in order to stand a better chance of running the memory at sync with the fsb?

    GHoosdum, all the 800 fsb P4's have HT enabled on them, not just the high end ones like the 533 fsb parts. I wouldn't even consider a non-HT(for whatever dubious help HT gives ;) ) P4 to play with.
  • ThraxThrax 🐌 Austin, TX Icrontian
    edited December 2003
    I'd get the 2.6 for $6 more.
  • Al_CapownAl_Capown Indiana
    edited December 2003
    Thrax had this to say
    For the life of me, I can't find an IC7G Max2. Not even on Abit's site.

    Are you sure you don't mean Abit IC7G, or IC7-MAX3? Did you maybe squash board names together by mistake? As far as motherboards are concerned, the IC7G and the MAX3 are the best available for Intel.

    Abit IC7-G Max II Advance

    My complaints with your system are very minimal, but complaints still.

    Perhaps it might be worth it to pay $6 more for a processor typically capable of .2 GHz more when overclocked (2.4C=~3.0, 2.6C=~3.2-3.3) or perhaps $29 more for something that will typically do .5GHz more when overclocked (2.8C=~3.4-3.5).

    Secondly, do you think that running pc3200LL with a 5:4 divisor and 5-2-2-2 timings would yield better performance than 1:1 @ 250 8-4-4-3? That way you could save a few bucks.

    Just my thoughts, the system you spec'd would be just fine probably.
  • DogSoldierDogSoldier The heart of radical Amish country..
    edited December 2003
    Mudd, looks good (Just get your mobo designations correct). Should be a very OCeable system.

    Ghoosdum, the 2.4Cs have HT, the 2.4Bs don't. I have my 2.4C OCd to 3.18 263FSB with the RAM running 1:1. A lot of it has to do with luck, but the 2.4Cs are pretty lucky.
  • Geeky1Geeky1 University of the Pacific (Stockton, CA, USA)
    edited December 2003
    Stop the presses! Hell has officially frozen.

    Has anyone else noticed this?
    muddocktor had this to say:
    I've been thinking about building a 800 fsb P4 system

    Followed by:
    Thrax had this to say:
    CPU is good.

    :wtf: :wow: :wow: :wow:

    Who are you, and what have you done with Thrax?

    :D;D

    In all seriousness, the setup looks fine. Although I've heard that Kingston's HyperX is better for the P4 than Corsair's stuff is...
  • GHoosdumGHoosdum Icrontian
    edited December 2003
    I noticed that too. I didn't want to say anything for fear of also being converted by whatever got Thrax...
  • ThraxThrax 🐌 Austin, TX Icrontian
    edited December 2003
    CPU is good for <b>him</b> within the confines of his decision. I think it's an overpriced lump of ****..... And I always will.
  • TheLostSwedeTheLostSwede Trondheim, Norway Icrontian
    edited December 2003
    Muddocktor,

    Is there any chance to get Twinmos with winbond there? The CH5 does 230+ 1:1 at 5,3,2,2 most of the time. Wouldn't that be perfect on a 2.4C? If the cpu can do more, just relax the timings and give it more fsb. That way, you are covered if you know what i mean. Or get the Kingston 3500 6,3,2,2. Both me and Lasse have tested them for a while. One of my sticks where bad, but Lasses pair does splendid. Last i heard, they passed Goldmemory at 242 and 6,2,2,2 timings in dual.
  • muddocktormuddocktor
    edited December 2003
    Thrax had this to say
    CPU is good for <b>him</b> within the confines of his decision. I think it's an overpriced lump of ****..... And I always will.

    It might be an overpriced lump of ****, but I can afford to get it right now. I've never had a Pee4 to mess with since they came out, so I figured I'd try 1 out and see how it compares to my NF7/Barton rig.

    I think I will go for the 2.6 instead of the 2.4. I can't see paying an extra $30 or so more for a 2.8 over the 2.6 though.

    Al, I believe I'll stick with the XMS4000LL for $60 a stick. That's a hell of a good price, I think. Must be a special or something.

    Mack, the HyperX is $63 a stick at newegg. It shows the same timings as the Corsair. Do you think it will perform better than the Corsair?
  • Al_CapownAl_Capown Indiana
    edited December 2003
    I don't think CH5 is the way to go here, as I'm guessing muddocktor wants 250+ fsb @ 1:1.

    But if mudd is willing to look at some ch5 you could go this route:
    2x of this Buffalo 256MB Pc3200 $72. These aren't guaranteed to be CH5 or winbond for that matter, however if you look in the reviews you'll see that many people have gotten ch5's non-the-less. I'm guessing that the odds of getting CH5 are the same as getting an 1800+ DLT3C JIUHB from newegg, which are pretty good odds.

    Now about Kingston, through looking at newegg the pc4000 kingston is $83 and the pc3700 kingston is $63. By no means is that pc3700 memory sufficient for a P4 1:1. I have it in my 2.6 system and it doesn't even meet spec (233) 1:1, no matter what voltages I feed it.

    I'm gonna go pull the heatspreaders from that memory and see what chips they use. Be right back.
  • ThraxThrax 🐌 Austin, TX Icrontian
    edited December 2003
    I would get the Corsair 4000.
  • GHoosdumGHoosdum Icrontian
    edited December 2003
    We know you would. :D
  • ThraxThrax 🐌 Austin, TX Icrontian
    edited December 2003
    Naturally. :tongue:
  • muddocktormuddocktor
    edited December 2003
    I tend to go Corsair myself. They make great memory and I have experience with their products, which I don't have with the Kingston.

    Al, I think I'll stick with the Corsair; I know for sure what I'm getting with them and it still fits within my budget.
  • croc_croc_ New
    edited December 2003
    Thrax had this to say
    CPU is good for <b>him</b> within the confines of his decision. I think it's an overpriced lump of ****..... And I always will.

    thats the Thrax we all know and ..... love.
  • ThraxThrax 🐌 Austin, TX Icrontian
    edited December 2003
    <font size=6 color=red face=trebuchet><3</font>
  • muddocktormuddocktor
    edited December 2003
    Well, I'm just about to push the button on the order. Thbis is what I'm going with:

    The Abit board
    2.6 Pee4/800
    2 sticks of Corsair XMS4000LL
    Vantec Tornado
    Nexus fan controller

    The total for all that comes out to $466.97, including shipping.

    Thrax, I know I am sinning by going over to the dark side, but I just have to quell my curiosity about the Pee4 systems.:crazy: The price point on the FX is just too high right now and I'm not interested in a socket 754 setup either. Hopefully some time next year when the socket 939 boards are out, the price point on the FX will be somewhat lower so that I can mess with that.:)
  • GHoosdumGHoosdum Icrontian
    edited December 2003
    What does the "LL" stand for on the RAM? I know in automotive light bulbs, it stands for "Long Life" but I don't think this is the case here...

    Good choices, mud... if Pee4 you must!
  • ThraxThrax 🐌 Austin, TX Icrontian
    edited December 2003
    Low Latency. The designation for their 2/2/2 modules.

    LL = 2/2/2
    C2 = Cas2
    PRO = LED Packaging
    TWINX = DCDDR Kit
    PT = Platinum spreaders
  • GHoosdumGHoosdum Icrontian
    edited December 2003
    Then I'm assuming those 2 sticks are 256MB each... unless RAM prices really fell through the floor in the past 2 weeks.
  • Al_CapownAl_Capown Indiana
    edited December 2003
    Yep they're 2x 256.

    Ram prices blow right now.

    Update on the $63 Kingston HyperX Pc3700. The memory chip reads
    Samsung 328
    K4H560838E - TCCC
    BEEH77PA

    Can Mackanz or anyone else help me and tell me what else these RAM chips are used in? Whether it be corsair 3700, mushkin3700, buffalo3700, or no name brand, and how they typically overclock?
  • mmonninmmonnin Centreville, VA
    edited December 2003
    Mudd: Its not the LL RAM like you think. The $60 PC4000 sticks are Model#: CMX256-4000PT.
  • TheLostSwedeTheLostSwede Trondheim, Norway Icrontian
    edited December 2003
    There's no way there is any PC4000 2,2,2 ram out.
  • ketoketo Occupied. Or is it preoccupied? Icrontian
    edited December 2003
    AFAIK there's no such thing as PC4000 rated at CAS 2.0. Corsair has 4000 and 4000Pro, tho on their website both are 3-4-4-8.

    2.6 is a good choice but Al is correct in saying *most often* a 2.8 will clock a little higher overall, plus the higher you go, the easier it is to stay at 1:1 mem:fsb. I'd be inclined to spend the extra $30 on the 2.8 personally.

    I'm gritting my teeth over your mobo selection. If you want a great Abit board, go IS7. Yes, it's the 865 not 875 but it has the Abit equivalent of PAT that gives the extra system boost the 875 is famous for. The IS7-G has dual SATA RAID also, tho it doesn't sound like this is a primary consideration - just keep in mind that with the IC7Max2 the RAID is run thru an onboard chip and over the PCI bus whereas if you get a board with the ICH5R southbridge, the SATA RAID is independent of PCI.
  • TheLostSwedeTheLostSwede Trondheim, Norway Icrontian
    edited December 2003
    Samsung are mostly Cas 3 chips. For low latency, ONLY Winbond BH5, BH6 or CH5 will do. The ones that guarantee BH5 chips are Mushkin Level 2 3500, OCZ Limited Edition 3500. ALL Twinmos with Winbond bought from summer and forwarding are CH5.

    BH5 will do 5,2,2,2 at X fsb 1:1 and CH5 USUALLY does 5,3,2,2 at X fsb. Both of them just LOVES voltage. Running 3.5V 24/7 isn't any problems at all.

    The Samsungs are used in most of the High Latency memory modules by Geil, OCZ, Mushkin, Kingston and Corsair but Infineons have been seen as well. The Samsungs are 3200 chips originally as far as i know.
  • ThraxThrax 🐌 Austin, TX Icrontian
    edited December 2003
    Their designation may have changed, however as of the PC3500 modules, LL = 2/2/2.
  • Straight_ManStraight_Man Geeky, in my own way Naples, FL Icrontian
    edited December 2003
    Well, the first 2 instead of a 2.5, followed with a 2 instead of a 3, followed by a 2 instead of a 3, is very respectable low latency. Look at the speed recommends for PT and Pro, and you get a JEDEC test spec, and they say it is bus speed tuned and latency auto and relaxed latency. They designed your choice for a bus OC in speed, and say they get better performance with a very high bus speed and relaxed latency. I would try TWINX pair, as below:

    http://www.corsairmemory.com/corsair/products/specs/twinx512-4000.pdf

    Um, for dual channel either one module per channel of 256 size, or two twinx packs for .5 GIG per channel. If you populate just one channel, you will get a perfomance hit, and with matched pairs, one pair pack per channel would be best. So when and if you get a second pack, pair the original pack pair in same channel bank first.

    Here's something to make you-all drool, though... :D

    http://www.corsairmemory.com/corsair/products/specs/twinx1024-4400.pdf

    highlight: DDR550, 575 MHz RAM bus(not RAMBUS memory, speed of RAM bus) speed capable.

    Note, this is not a CMX, this is an XMS series pdf., twin-pack, matched and prestested as pair. You are paying for the matching, RAM modules on sticks can and do randomly vary, and matched can be worth it in long run if OCing. For normal use, no OC, CMX is fine, but you will run into limits with OCing with non-matched RAM. Both these lines are available as Black or Platinum heat spreaders, platinum looks cooler, think the black might be a tiny tib more heat dump capable.

    Here is something to also think about-- mfr's do salvage RAM modules on sticks that do not pass highend line testing, and issue as more economical lines with slower stated speed specs at which sticks ARE stable, but the economicla lines are more likely to have RAM modules that are not perfectly speed synced and will be less stable than the higher end at same settings, typically the recommends are lower simply because one or modules are unstable at the rates stated for high-end. You can get lucky, with individual sticks, but the matched paris are more overall likely to give you best high-extreme-end OCing as far as RAM itself.

    Ciliff's Notes: ALL lines from mfr X are NOT equal, for ANY chip mfr, and OEMs can be lemons for OCing much more often than high-end (highest end, then value, then OEM is descending average quality for OC).

    John.
Sign In or Register to comment.