I had an issue with my AVG where it refused to auto update for forever, and the problem came back after a week even when I reinstalled it and did troubleshooting and so on- and I ended up getting a ton of viruses as a result (Partially my fault, I didn't notice when it wasn't updating). I changed to Avira, and I'm happy and virus free.
I switched two notebook computers from AVG to MSSE today (one XP, one W7) to try. My initial impression is positive compared to AVG regarding the resource use (CPU+MEM) and user interface. Time will tell about the security. I will try Avira on another computer in parallel.
I went a while without running an Anti Virus at all, mostly because of the performance hit, but for the last couple years, with multi core processing and 4GB of ram or more, not to mention all the great free options, its a no brainier to keep some real time protection.
I don't knock Avira, its a great tool and its free, I just found that it would raise allot of unnecessary flags. AVG has served me very nicely.
I've been using Avira ever since the great motherboard death of this summer and the subsequent Windows 7 install. While I don't have any problem with it's resource usage or anything, the nag windows it pops up to try and get you to buy the full version instead of the free version annoy the piss out of me. To the point where I'm about ready to dump it and go back to Avast! or AVG.
I switched to Avast about 10 months ago. I am very happy with it! I even purchased the WHS version which then integrates all the desktop versions and keeps track of everything. I can even scan remotely if needed.
I've been using Avira ever since the great motherboard death of this summer and the subsequent Windows 7 install. While I don't have any problem with it's resource usage or anything, the nag windows it pops up to try and get you to buy the full version instead of the free version annoy the piss out of me. To the point where I'm about ready to dump it and go back to Avast! or AVG.
I've been using the beta of MS's Security Essentials since it came out in my win7 beta and I've been very happy with it. I have tested it a couple times with sending in virus signatures in various ways and it's caught them all. I'm not actually worried about getting a virus myself because, well I'm not dumb. So it's more about preventing oops' if my wife is using the computer of if I'm needing to trouble shoot someone elses harddrive etc...
So for those reasons I want an anti-virus software that doesn't hit the system resources badly and MS really is pretty light weight in that dept. It is far less of a hog compared to AVG and I've never personally liked Avast so I can't directly compare it.
Normally if I was just needing a scan on demand anti-virus only I use clamwin. However because I do want some real-time scanning for oops protection I will be using Microsoft Security Essentials from now on. I'm quiet happy with it's performance and feel comfortable with it's security.
Plus the dinks at Symantec have said it's horrible, useless and generally prone to horrible failure and no one should ever use it. Given their track record that's an awesome recommendation in my books. The whole enemy of my enemy thingy.
Comments
By the way, I use Avast and recommend it to all my clients. I'll have to check out Avira some time.
I don't knock Avira, its a great tool and its free, I just found that it would raise allot of unnecessary flags. AVG has served me very nicely.
http://bit.ly/10yP7q
What's wrong with them? They look perfectly fine to me.
So for those reasons I want an anti-virus software that doesn't hit the system resources badly and MS really is pretty light weight in that dept. It is far less of a hog compared to AVG and I've never personally liked Avast so I can't directly compare it.
Normally if I was just needing a scan on demand anti-virus only I use clamwin. However because I do want some real-time scanning for oops protection I will be using Microsoft Security Essentials from now on. I'm quiet happy with it's performance and feel comfortable with it's security.
Plus the dinks at Symantec have said it's horrible, useless and generally prone to horrible failure and no one should ever use it. Given their track record that's an awesome recommendation in my books. The whole enemy of my enemy thingy.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FMXeE1EXJPM