Help bring me up-to-date on network appliances for filtering
primesuspect
Beepin n' BoopinDetroit, MI Icrontian
I have a lead on a job for an old client, and I need to be brought up to date to make sure I recommend the right solution.
This is a network of <20 clients
They want an internet access appliance such as a WatchGuard Firebox or a Barracuda web filter. Apparently there is a great deal of internet abuse at this company. Here is a bullet list of what they need to be able to do:
If you guys have advice and first-hand experience with any particular brand, I'd love hearing it. I don't think I'll have any trouble setting things up, but it's been a few years since I've been in the biz, and I want some more in-the-trenches opinions. Right now all I have to go on is the sales and marketing materials from each manufacturer.
Thanks!
This is a network of <20 clients
They want an internet access appliance such as a WatchGuard Firebox or a Barracuda web filter. Apparently there is a great deal of internet abuse at this company. Here is a bullet list of what they need to be able to do:
- Filter out all but a specific set of websites to most client workstations
- Very easily add/delete sites from the filter
- Track web usage on clients (where did they go)
If you guys have advice and first-hand experience with any particular brand, I'd love hearing it. I don't think I'll have any trouble setting things up, but it's been a few years since I've been in the biz, and I want some more in-the-trenches opinions. Right now all I have to go on is the sales and marketing materials from each manufacturer.
Thanks!
0
Comments
But the internet abuse (myspace!) is getting out of hand!
I considered going with Watchguard, but the NSA 2400 rocked my sox. Sonicwall support has been awesome, though most of the UTM features are subscription based, basica functionality still kicks arse.
I could give better detail with my experiences with the NSA2400 if needed.
I have experience with Sonicwall stuff, but it's probably outdated. It definitely is rock-solid hardware, but the cost is pretty high.
also: isn't that just a blanket policy for the whole org though?
The bossman wants specific computers to have different policies; some all-open, some blocking social networks, some blocking other stuff, etc.
First it's ridiculously easy and even if you are using other means I'd still suggest putting this in place (just the free version) as a catch all filter. Their DNS servers are fast and even their basic ad-filtering and other catchall's work great.
If you want to get more specific policy use then you'd need the deluxe version. I haven't fully delved into it enough to know if you can setup specific per user based policies. But at the very least you create bi-pass passwords so users with that password can get through.
Now depending on how picky your boss is this may not do all that he wants. But depending on how much he's wanting to pay there are sometimes compromises that need to be made.
One thing is you can literally get the free version of OpenDNS up and running in about 15 minutes and nicely configured with a good blanket policy - and tested in about 60 minutes and that requires no hardware or software investment.
1) Sign up for an account
2) Point your last step external DNS pointers to use OpenDNS.
2a) If you have a static IP just create the network
2b) If you have a dynamic IP you have to install some software so that OpenDNS gets updated to know which network you are coming from.
3) Start turning on some rules
4) start testing on various computers.
It's that easy.
We use CensorNet at work. A 25 concurrent user license runs us $880/year. They do have a free open-source version but it's not maintained anymore.
I want something I can set up once and then not worry about again
I don't want to say that it's bulletproof or foolproof or anything like that. But it's in the ball park.
Users A, B, and C can go to facebook, but not D or E
Users A, C, D can go to cnn, but not B or E.
etc.?
Which leads me back to:
Yes, you could control each user. We made three groups. You then assign machines to the group you want by MAC address. The main group can only get to 6 web sites.
It works great, and once you set it up for him, he can adjust the groups by a txt file that controls each group.
The only downside is that you have to point each workstation to a proxy server. Saavy users will get around that so I prevented them from seeing that setting through Group Policy. For the Firefox users I prevented it by.....don't remember but it can be done. My FF users can't get to the proxy server settings either.