He's referring to the semantic difference between gigabits (Gb) and gigabytes (GB), being snarky about the fact that there really is no "gb" as described in the headline.
Just for the pedantic neckbeards: I do know the difference between GB and Gb, but I just don't care because everybody knows what we mean when we say 480gb. Let the rage flow through you.
Just for the pedantic neckbeards: I do know the difference between GB and Gb, but I just don't care because everybody knows what we mean when we say 480gb. Let the rage flow through you.
Comments