15 Feb 2008 ~ 8:34amGHoosdum
Does that include my 8600 GT or were they just referring to the 8 series GPUs that were not simply 7's with an incrementing counter?
24 Feb 2008 ~ 10:14pmUPSLynx
This sounds great. I'm pumped about getting free phys-x functionality on my 8800gtx. However, I'm not to thrilled about this idea:
" It might—and probably will—encourage people to buy a second GPU for their SLI slot. And for the highest-end gamer, it will encourage them to buy three GPUs. Potentially two for graphics and one for physics, or one for graphics and two for physics."
I, along with many of you, are that highest-end gamer. I want nothing to do with 3 top tier GPU's. Roughly $1300 for my graphics solution? No thanks, no matter what the gains. I just hope they REALLY don't push for this mantra with GPUs in the future. I can see it now, hardware requirements that ask for an extra GPU for physics processing. An idea like that could really hurt the enthusiast markets.
24 Feb 2008 ~ 11:08pmRWB
I forgot what I put in my brothers desktop but it's an 8 series card of some sort. So that is cool news to me, don't mind buying a second card to help out for a nice budget system.
24 Feb 2008 ~ 11:50pmmas0n
I'd rather offload physics to a dedicated CPU core, but I guess this is a step in the right direction. Ultimately, I'd like to be able to quickly choose where I want physics processed depending on the game and create profiles, etc...
25 Feb 2008 ~ 3:44amHarudath
Sounds like a good idea to me, at least we have a choice now. If you've got a Quad that'll be fine for physics, but if you've got an 8#00 series card that you want to use for it instead, then that's fine imo I just can't wait to try it out :P
Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!