If geeks love it, we’re on it

8 core Nehalem Xeon tips up

8 core Nehalem Xeon tips up

The International Solid State Circuits Conference running February 8-12 in San Francisco will host a cadre of venerable tech firms, including Intel, which plans to discuss an octo-core Nehalem-based Xeon.

Evidence for the beastly CPU is revealed in item 3.1 on page 22 of the full conference itinerary (PDF):

8core_xeon

Significant evidence adds veracity to the idea that this is indeed a Nehalem:

  • An octo-core Penryn-based part would have an unworkable TDP. The Xeon X7460, a hexa-core chip based on Penryn architecture already claims a 130W TDP at just 2.66GHz. A higher envelope could easily be considered unsuitable given contemporary conventions for datacenter greenliness.
  • A 6.4GT/s I/O lane smacks of the 6.4GT/s QuickPath Interconnect bus featured on today’s Nehalem processors. Given that QPI taps out around 7GT/s without the aid of phase changing, it’s unlikely that Intel has delivered a faster grade. That aside, the Penryn just doesn’t offer this kind of bus bandwidth.
  • The transistor count is about right for an octo-core Nehalem. Today’s Bloomfield-based desktop Nehalem CPUs feature 731 million transistors with just 8MB lf L3 cache. Tripling the L3 cache to 24MB and doubling the core count spits out a 2,669,959,552 transistor chip. Tack on some architecture optimizations and some cache sharing, and you’re at a shiny 2.3 billion.

You can expect to see this chip known as the Beckton in the coming months. Chips based on this core will fit in a 90W, 105W or 130W TDP, use four QPI links (Bloomfield uses two), and rock FB-DIMM.

When all is said and done: we want.

Comments

  1. BuddyJ
    BuddyJ Dear programmers,
    Please make neat software and games that make use of multiple cores. This single and dual core business has gone on long enough.
    Love,
    Buddy J
  2. Snarkasm
    Snarkasm
    Buddy J wrote:
    Dear programmers,
    Please make neat software and games that make use of multiple cores. This single and dual core business has gone on long enough.
    Love,
    Buddy J

    thisXinfinity
  3. MiracleManS
    MiracleManS Unfortunately its not THAT easy to do multi-core development if you haven't been instructed on how to do it.

    I remember the first time I even learned to use threads was an obstacle in and of itself. I imagine they're only going to get better, but I, personally, can't imagine having to deal with management of multiple threads across multiple cores.
  4. pragtastic
    pragtastic Language is a big hindrance to multi-threaded / parallel programming IMO. Few of the mainstream languages make it a reasonable task, especially for small shops / solo programmers.

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!