If geeks love it, we’re on it

CoolIT ECO A.L.C. review

CoolIT ECO A.L.C. review

Liquid cooling is one of the facets of high-end computing that sets the hardcore apart from the casuals. Those that use it swear by it and know that there is no alternative that comes close. Those that don’t use it struggle to understand it and shy away from its general complexity. Despite the different viewpoints, one thing is clear: liquid cooling is a complicated solution that results in some of the lowest attainable temperatures.

CoolIT, a company known for its wide range of cooling solutions with a strong focus on liquid coolers, understands this gap between PC enthusiasts. The CoolIT ECO A.L.C. is an attempt to bridge that gap. The ECO is a liquid cooling solution that stresses simplicity in design, expedience with installation and longevity in operation. It comes entirely pre-assembled and sealed. It doesn’t require the user to fill the liquid loop, and promises 50,000 hours of operation on the included coolant.

Heralded as a CES Innovations 2010 Design and Engineering Awards honoree, the little cooling machine has been gathering a lot of buzz. So, we decided to have CoolIT put their money where their sockets are and let me, an enthusiast whom has never had any experiences with liquid cooling systems, attempt to install the ECO and put it to the heat.

It can be quite surprising pulling the ECO out of its box for the first time. The system is compact and all-in-one. No assembly is required for the actual cooling unit. There is a 120mm fan, which is attached to the system’s radiator. From the radiator are two flexible tubes which lead the coolant to the socket retention and pump. The pump actually sits on top of the CPU retention module and has a very low profile.

retention plate

The retention bracket can be adjusted for all modern CPU sockets

The ECO supports Intel’s LGA775, LGA1156 and LGA1366 sockets, as well as AMD’s AM2, AM2+ and AM3 sockets out of the box. The retention system can easily change to the necessary socket size without the use of tools. You simply pull up on the thumb screws, slide them to the labeled socket size lines, and drop the thumb screws in. The ECO also ships with motherboard backplates for all socket sizes for additional rigidity.

Picking up the ECO, the first thing you’ll notice is that it’s quite durable. Despite the unit being pre-assembled and pre-sealed, it feels like it was constructed well. You can handle the unit from any point without fear of the liquid loop breaking apart, or the radiator falling free from the fan.

As you can see from the video, installation of the fan and radiator was a bit tricky for me. Despite claims of the ECO being able to fit into any chassis, the unit actually required me to make some modifications to my chassis, the Gigabyte 3D Aurora. I had to remove the tool-less clamp for the PCI cards, as its presence did not allow the ECO’s 120mm fan to meet the screw mounts. The design of the radiator also left me unable to use the tool-less chassis fan clamps. Finally, the top of the radiator comes into contact with my chassis’ second 120mm fan, leaving the ECO’s fan unable to be totally flush with the fan grille. All minor complaints, really, but it should be noted that compatibility with all computer cases may require some tweaking.

Results

Once the ECO A.L.C. was installed, it was time to put it to work with the OCCT Linpack Test. For this comparison, the CoolIT ECO was also tested against the Arctic Cooling Freezer 7 Pro and the stock Intel LGA775 heatsink. All coolers were evaluated on an Intel Core 2 Duo E6420 at 2.2GHz and a Vcore of 1.36V. The ECO was installed using the pre-applied thermal compound, while the Freezer 7 Pro and the stock cooler both used Arctic Silver thermal compound.

As you can see, the CoolIT ECO A.L.C. was rather evenly matched with the air coolers at idle. The trend continued under load, but the ECO did manage to pull away by 2°C over the Freezer 7 Pro. The ECO’s numbers aren’t the most impressive we’ve seen, especially for a liquid cooling solution, but they are hardly temps to scoff at, either.

Considerations

Is the ECO A.L.C. worth your hard earned cash? It really depends on who you are. The hardcore overclocking enthusiast will not be interested. The ECO isn’t the most efficient cooler out there, especially considering that there are cheaper, more efficient air-based alternatives such as the Arctic Cooling Freezer 7 Pro.

The ECO's pump is attached to the retention bracket and has a very low profile

The ECO also doesn’t make for a very effective entry product to liquid cooling, either. Despite ease of installation, the pre-sealed nature of the ECO does nothing to actually teach users about liquid cooling. From setup to maintenance, there are many important lessons to be learned in the realm of liquid cooling, lessons that cannot be taught through the installation and use of the ECO.

We certainly can’t forget the installation issues I had with the radiator. There’s a good chance that many users will install the fan without any issues at all. The very existence of a possible need for chassis modification, however, may scare off the novice users who aren’t as capable with such feats of hardware hackery.

The CoolIT ECO A.L.C. installed

On the flip side, the ECO is a very attractive cooling solution with an equally attractive price. At an MSRP of $75, the ECO is one of the most affordable liquid cooling solutions out there. CoolIT set out to create a product that delivers the best liquid cooling bang for the buck, and in the case of the ECO, they were successful.

The unit is several times less complex than typical liquid cooling solutions, which is a definite plus to any user who doesn’t want to deal with the perils of setting up their own liquid cooling loop. The ECO is also completely maintenance free, negating the need for regular coolant refills and monitoring. Such ease of use is certainly going to be compelling to users.

The ECO is also a quiet system. The pump is quiet enough that no audible noise can be heard from it above the chassis fans. The 120mm fan attached to the radiator is actually quieter than the 120mm Gigabyte fan that sits directly above it. Where some air based coolers may be more efficient than the ECO, they certainly aren’t as quiet.

Pre-applied thermal paste and multiple sized backplates ensure ease of installation

Finally, the ECO A.L.C.’s impressive compatibility with the market’s complete range of active sockets gets definite thumbs up. The unit can fit plenty of old processors, and is future-proofed with support for AM3 and 1366 socket support. Changing socket type on the retention bracket is unbelievably easy. This is a cooling solution that you can purchase and take with you as you upgrade components.

Final thoughts

In short, you need to know what you want out of cooling before buying the ECO. If you’re looking for a high-efficiency setup that will keep your processor in an ice box when you overclock it well beyond its recommended operation frequencies, then you probably should look elsewhere. If you want a simplified liquid cooling solution that shoots par for the course and won’t break the bank, then the CoolIT ECO A.L.C. is right up your alley.

Comments

  1. _k
    _k Wait this got tested against an air cooler with a 92mm fan?
  2. mirage
    mirage
    _k_ wrote:
    Wait this got tested against an air cooler with a 92mm fan?

    ... and still could not beat it.

    What were the processor, frequency, and vcore, please?

    When you said "running Prime95 fully loaded" on the movie, Speedfan was indicating only one core loaded. You need to run two worker threads for fully loading the dual-core cpu.
  3. drasnor
    drasnor The ECO ALC fit like a glove in my Lian Li PC-8B case. A couple things I noticed that you didn't mention in your review:

    Those hoses are stiff. The curvature seen in your installation video is literally the most you can get them to bend. I've worked with laboratory hose similar to what other water cooling systems use and it is far more flexible. In my case, my CPU socket is closer to the back panel than yours and I ended up with some extra hose that stuck out the side of the case. I ended up pulling the CPU block out and rotating it a few times to take up the slack. Getting it to seat properly after that was a neat trick.

    The manual that came with my ECO stated which motherboard fan headers to use for the radiator fan and pump in really small print that I missed the first time through. The ECO needs the pump on the CPU block plugged into a system fan header and the radiator fan plugged into the CPU fan header. To be honest, their installation documentation sucks in general.

    Also, as far as the "EXTREEM COOL" goes, if you want that kind of performance you can always swap the radiator fan for a 120x38 Delta.
  4. mirage
    mirage So, Drasnor, what is your impression with this cooler?
  5. drasnor
    drasnor I like it because it keeps my machine relatively cool even with my motherboard's speed controls throttling down the pump and radiator fan to extremely quiet levels. The ECO also doesn't impede free access to my memory, graphics card, or power supply which is great for when I want to clean the inside of my PC or help a friend diagnose problems with their PC. Installation wasn't as easy as advertised but it's still easier than trying to secure a 2 kg copper brick to my motherboard and wondering if I'm going to crack something. To say anything useful about its actual performance for comparison with other coolers would require laboratory testing.
  6. Thrax
    Thrax The inaccuracies in this article have been corrected. All coolers have been retested with OCCT's Linpack test, and the article now describes the CPU they were tested on.
  7. _k
    _k Do we have any idea what the ambient temperature was because the classic problem with small rads is once the air temp gets around 80F they just plain suck? And tsk tsk on bobby for not using OCCT in the first place, or folding SMP client.
  8. Barrolde Hey Gang, Barry here with CoolIT.

    First of all - nice review. Well spoken guy and good editing, it was nice to read and watch.

    I've been with CoolIT over 3 years now and have watched the popularity, acceptance and understand of our products go up continually but still they are a bit misunderstood.

    It's easy to have a tendancy to compare our sealed systems to full blown DIY water but thats not really where ECO lives... its as you've seen actually much more of a heatsink that is quieter and better for your motherboard as drasnor has said. It happens to use water to tranfer the heat from point a to b. To that end we don't position or price ECO to compete with DIY water loops so you shouldn't be disapointed if you don't get that kind of performance.

    Regarding the installation, as Bobby points out - the issue is as much w/ the case as it is the cooler. Little bit of homework in case selection never hurts no matter what cooler you are using. We are ok with that though as the compatibilty for ECO is really high.

    Icrontic, I really appreciate your work and hope you don't take my feedback the wrong way. I think I gushed over your Domino review too last year.. you guys are on the ball :)

    Quick question - did you have the pump and the fan plugged into regulated motherboard headers?

    You should not regulate the pump (12v only in the manual) but can regulate the fan if you wish or let it blow at 12v for better performance, its still not loud as its throttled to 1800rpm.

    I was a little dissapointed by the performance #'s so just kinda trying to figure ut why.

    Cheers!
  9. Thrax
    Thrax Barry:

    Thanks for taking the time to come chat with us on Icrontic. We're always happy to talk with industry folk, and even happier when they stop by for open dialogue.

    I've poked Bobby to make sure he sees your post, and I'm sure he can answer your question(s).

    Cheers!
  10. mirage
    mirage The CPU is a 2.2 GHz dual-core. It is not giving sufficient challenge to the coolers to differentiate the better one. Additionally, the video still shows one of the cores idle, see below.
  11. Thrax
    Thrax The video was not re-edited/re-shot. All CPUs were re-tested with OCCT.
  12. Barrolde My Pleasure Thrax, I love what I do and firmly believe that as CPU's and GPU's keep getting hotter than sealed liquid systems represent the future of keeping them cool. Heatsinks can only get sooo big before we'll be putting the case inside the heatsink ;)

    Now there is an idea!

    Looking forward to Bobby's feedback on the fan / pump config.

    Cheers!
  13. Cliff_Forster
    Cliff_Forster I will say from experience that coolers are the hardest thing to evaluate. Even a mild variation in thermal compound, or installation pressure, room temps, case airflow, BIOS controls for the fans, anything can impact the performance.

    I just reinstalled my cooler master hyper 520 after a motherboard RMA, and it performs at least 20% better than it did, I thought it was hunk of junk before, now I kind of dig it. Why? I'm not 100% sure? I just reinstalled it, and suddenly it cools better, probably just a small variation in how it got installed the 2nd time that improved contact with the CPU, but honestly, who knows?

    Point being, cooler reviews are a tricky business loaded with variation from install to install. If you compare sites for various coolers you will notice major differences despite similar testing methods on certain models, its just the nature of the beast. Coolers are extremely hard to evaluate consistently.
  14. mertesn
    mertesn
    I just reinstalled my cooler master hyper 520 after a motherboard RMA, and it performs at least 20% better than it did, I thought it was hunk of junk before, now I kind of dig it. Why? I'm not 100% sure? I just reinstalled it, and suddenly it cools better, probably just a small variation in how it got installed the 2nd time that improved contact with the CPU, but honestly, who knows?
    Did you reapply your thermal compound? That could make the entire difference. The stuff does occasionally need to be reapplied.
  15. UPSLynx
    UPSLynx Barry,

    Thanks for dropping us a line!

    I did have the ECO pump and fan installed into the correct headers. The fan went into the CPU header, and the pump was plugged directly to the PSU. I did double check that to be sure. That being said, my motherboard sucks. And my powersupply sucks. ...among other things. It's a situation that's being remedied as I type this.

    The last two weeks have presented me with very interesting challenges regarding my motherboard and powersupply. There is a chance that the ECO wasn't getting the appropriate voltage to some degree on account of the motherboard or PSU. It wouldn't be the first time that my system has given me trouble in such a way.

    And Mirage, Thrax is correct. I was unable to re-shoot the video after I fixed the testing issues. That quick segment serves inaccurate, but the actual data you see in the review is correct with both cores being push to 100%.
  16. Bandrik
    Bandrik Nice review, Bobby. Loved the video you made - while long, it felt like it went quickly. That was likely due to the tight editing to remove any slow parts like screwing things in, etc. Every second was important.

    Though I do have to wonder what the cooling potential would be if you did another test with some nice thermal paste, like Arctic Silver.

    Finally, regarding Cliff's comments, I agree that there is a lot of variance that can go into a cooler's review. But there still is a lot of truth in this review as it still shows the hardware and any headaches that may arise during the install phase. Plus the numbers, while they should not be taken as gospel, reflect his "real world" results - they still have some value.

    That's for the review, Bobby!
  17. Cliff_Forster
    Cliff_Forster To be clear, I don't mean to question Bobby in any way, I'm just saying that variation in cooler evaluations tend to be par for the course. The only way to know for sure is to take it apart, re test, then test again on another platform, then re test it some more.

    Also, keep in mind, if that is a poly synthetic silver compound, you will not get a good thermal bond for a few days. You should load it, let it cool overnight, load it, then let it cool overnight again, repeat for a week. It sucks, but that stuff takes time to cure properly. Given time to properly cure, I have seen temps drop as much as 6 or 7 centigrade in some applications.

    So, if you had your air heat-sink with compound that has cured properly, then tested the ECO as soon as you popped it in, that could be a source of some variation.
  18. UPSLynx
    UPSLynx Those numbers on the graph were from having the ECO installed for three or four days. I initially ran tests the day I installed it, but when we needed to re-test with OCCT, I grabbed numbers from the ECO before removing it and dropping in the others. It did score better than it had before, so I think the compound was doing its thing.
  19. Barrolde You raise some really good points Cliff - i've discussed the inherit variables from one test to another at length on some forums. Unfortunately until we can reach a more standardized platform within the industry, we'll continue to face these challenges.

    That said - I don't have a problem with the Icrontic methodology at all, a good test done by good testers and we'll be sending them more of our products in the future.

    Cheers!

    Barry
  20. nicholas i just installed my eco alc and it just looks like the pump isn't working at all, the cpu heats up to 85 in a couple of minutes. im sure ive connected every thing checked the thermal paste and changed it also.. tghitned it aswell. But nothing, any help plss??

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!