If geeks love it, we’re on it

German president delays censorship law

German president delays censorship law

German President Horst Köhler has brought another delay to a maligned German bill designed to create a secret Internet blacklist in Germany by refusing to sign on the dotted line.

Köhler has requested supplementary information about the bill which would require the German government to adhere to a classified, state-managed list of blacklisted websites. The bill is alleged to be an effort against the proliferation of child pornography, but critics argue that it could be zealously extended to other, legal websites–a move tantamount to censorship, and a violation of German law.

The bill was created under the country’s previous administration, a grand coalition between the nation’s conservative Christian Democratic Union (CDU) and liberal Social Democratic (SPD) parties. Spearheaded by CDU ex-Family Minister Ursula von der Leyen, the bill has received more public backlash than any other political effort in the history of modern Germany.

Now that Köhler has refused to sign, the effort is effectively dead in committee until it can legally be rejected. If no legal method to reject the bill can be found, the German Ministries of Justice and the Interior have ordered federal authorities not to act on the law.

Comments

  1. Chip-Dapper
    Chip-Dapper I find it heart-warming that at least in Germany the extreme leftists and the extreme right-wing can finally join together in robbing their country's citizens blind of liberties one by one.Wish our politicians could get along like that...
  2. MachineDog
    MachineDog There aren't any methods for the legislature to override presidential veto in Germany?

    I really am not sure how I feel about censorship of this kind. I think it's certainly within the rights of a country to investigate trade of goods and information in and out of the country and deny those trades that are illegal. It seems like they always try to do it behind a curtain with a super top secret list and such though, which certainly goes against any kind of open democratic accountability.
  3. Snarkasm
    Snarkasm Rumor is that since the bill was introduced by the outgoing party but had already been passed, the new parliament couldn't just let it die - so the president sent it back requesting more information so it could die upon review.

    Interesting, if true.
  4. MJO
    MJO If only our politicians in Denmark had thought about this.
    Unfortunately they just implement all these crazy suggestions, and EU isn't much better.
    Don't even get me started on the INFOSOC directive.

    We already have such a list in Denmark, and actually the same technology has also been used to block other sites, that aren't exactly entirely legal or illegal.
    For example allofmp3 is blocked, and the same with Piratebay.
    Those two sites are in a bit of a gray area, regarding the legality.

    Furthermore, what is on the list?
    And how is it decided what gets on the list and not?
    At present it is a organization Red Barnet (save the children) and the Police that are maintaining the list. But personally I haven't got much faith regarding save the children, they seem to be a bit paranoid in some regards.

    I am using OpenDNS BTW.

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!