If geeks love it, we’re on it

JUSTICE Act would reverse telecom wiretap immunity

JUSTICE Act would reverse telecom wiretap immunity

A group of Senators led by Russ Feingold (D-WI) and Dick Durbin (D-IL) have floated the Judicious Use of Surveillance Tools in Counter-terrorism Efforts (JUSTICE) Act, a bill that would significantly reform the FISA Amendment Act and the PATRIOT Act.

The JUSTICE Act seeks to oust the most abusive portions of the PATRIOT Act and abolish the critically maligned FISA Amendment Act which gave telecom companies immunity for participation in the Bush administration’s warrantless wiretapping program.

Senator Feingold says the JUSTICE Act is designed to empower law enforcement while simultaneously guaranteeing that a citizen’s right to privacy and due process are not trampled in the process.

“Every single member of Congress wants to give our law enforcement and intelligence officials the tools they need to keep Americans safe,” said Feingold.

“But with the PATRIOT Act up for reauthorization, we should take this opportunity to fix the flaws in our surveillance laws once and for all. The JUSTICE Act permits the government to conduct necessary surveillance, but within a framework of accountability and oversight. It ensures both that our government has the tools to keep us safe, and that the privacy and civil liberties of innocent Americans will be protected.”

Abolition of the FISA Amendment Act which gives telecom companies immunity in warrantless wiretapping cases is a major push of the JUSTICE Act.  Should JUSTICE succeed in Congress, not only will telecom be subject to privacy suits, but the courts will finally be free to uncover the size and scope of the Bush administration’s warrantless wiretapping program.

“The bill would repeal the retroactive immunity provision in the FISA Amendments Act,” reads the prepared statement.

The act is also particularly critical of the PATRIOT Act’s so-called National Security Letters, or NSLs, which permit authorities to obtain private records without court order. Civil liberties groups have long feared that these clandestine letters would not go unabused, and various investigations have tangentially confirmed this fear.

JUSTICE will not completely eliminate NSLs, however. Instead, the letters will be subjected to renewed congressional oversight and a mechanism by which the details surrounding their creation and execution can be tracked.

“The bill rewrites the National Security Letter (NSL) statutes to ensure the FBI can obtain basic information without a court order, but also adds reasonable safeguards to ensure NSLs are only used to obtain records of people who have some connection to terrorism or espionage, and to provide meaningful, constitutionally sound judicial review of NSLs and associated gag orders,” the statement continues.

It is unclear if President Obama will support the JUSTICE Act given that he voted to uphold telecom immunity while he was a Senator.

Comments

  1. Thrax
    Thrax PASS THIS SHIT RIGHT NOW.
  2. Cliff_Forster
    Cliff_Forster This section of the Patriot Act was complete horse shit to begin with.

    The idea, that there was going to be a threat so imminent in nature that the extra couple hours it would take for a federal judge to hear the request is just moronic. It being packaged sold as the "Patriot" act during a time of fear and uncertainty so any Senator that would oppose it would be labeled as Anti American, Anti Security was also wrong, and I am ashamed America ever bought into this pile of shit.

    Wiretaps may sometimes be necessary. Sometimes with some level of urgency. No reason why federal judges whose sole purpose would be to hear these things at all hours could not have been appointed and ultimately held accountable for any unnecessary encroachment of freedom.

    Heck, during war time the President had the authority to issue an executive order to demand it from his desk in case of any emergency too pressing for a federal judge to hear it. The order is issued, then reviewed in a potential crisis. Problem there is he is held directly accountable and we obviously could not have that so the Patriot act was born, hooray for plausible deniability!!
  3. _k
    _k you mean someone is going to cut parts of these Acts Obama let stay?
  4. djmeph
    djmeph If Obama does not support this, I will not vote for him again.
  5. Komete
    Komete The executive branch never relinquishes power. That aside, I don't think Obama will come out in support or against it even if he would like to take apart the patriot act. If he did, it would give the far right plenty of fodder to complain about Obama making American unsafe and secretly being a terrorist sympathizer or something ridiculous like that.

    Then again, Obama continues to surprise me. I still don't have him pegged.
  6. Linc
    Linc $acronym_laws++

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!