If geeks love it, we’re on it

Noctua NH-U9B Heatsink Review

Noctua NH-U9B Heatsink Review

Installation

At Icrontic, we test heatsinks on both Intel and AMD platforms. As we discovered in our first heatsink roundup, performance can vary greatly between sockets. This is often due to differences in mounting systems. Our testing methodology and standard test configuration are explained in detail here.

Intel LGA 775 Installation

We had no issues mounting the NH-U9B on our Intel test rig. Noctua’s Secu-Firm mounting system has once again impressed me.

The LGA775 brackets are slightly different than those included with the NH-U12P. Noctua has permanently affixed threaded posts to the brackets. This ensures that a screw can not penetrate sensitive motherboard capacitors or coils beneath. On the flip side, it is a little more difficult to remove the NH-U9B if you use sticky thermal compound like Arctic Silver Ceramique. The posts prevent the heatsink from being rotated to break it loose. Its a trade off, but I think the extra security of attached posts outweighs this.

The backplate is still our preferred ‘X’ shape for LGA 775 systems. It stays out of the way of protruding pins at the rear of the motherboard.

The backplate is slightly different compared to the one included with the NH-U12P. It no longer has the adhesive padding on it. I never removed the tape backing as I frequently remove the heatsink. The revised backplate offers lots of padding to keep the motherboard safe and to prevent shorts. This is a definite improvement in my opinion.

I had no clearance issues with our Asus P5K-E. The final product is an impressive sight.

AMD Socket AM2 Installation

Socket AM2 installation was a little more involved, but provided a very secure mount.

The brackets mount using thick plastic spacers. There are insulating washers below.

The backplate is the same size and shape of the OEM backplate, so compatibility is likely with just about any AM2 board.

The NH-U9B allows for 45 degree rotation. I used the alternate mounting frame to allow for this. The only part of the installation that was a bit unclear was that the spring loaded mounting screws need to be put in place before the mounting frame is attached. Otherwise, the screws will not fit beneath the fin bank.

In the end, we have a very sturdy mount. Again, the Secu-Firm mounting system is top notch!

« Previous Next page »

Comments

  1. Winfrey
    Winfrey Great job Mike!

    Is there any pricing on either the NH-U12P or the NH-U9B?
  2. lemonlime
    lemonlime Thanks :)

    The NH-U9B goes for around ~$50, and the NH-U12P goes for around ~$60. They can be found for less on sale, I'm sure.
  3. DogSoldier
    DogSoldier Great review. But I don't see "A higher CFM fan is needed to unleash its full performance potential due to more densely packed fins." as a Con. Amazing little piece of "cool" engineering.
  4. lemonlime
    lemonlime
    DogSoldier wrote:
    Great review. But I don't see "A higher CFM fan is needed to unleash its full performance potential due to more densely packed fins." as a Con. Amazing little piece of "cool" engineering.

    Thanks :)

    I see what you are saying, DogSoldier. Densely packed fins may be a positive thing for some individuals. Performance on tap for those not interested in silent cooling is a good thing. From a buyers perspective though, the cost of a higher flow 92mm fan would have to be factored in.

    It would probably be more accurate to state that "The included fan is not able to unleash the NH-U9B's full performance potential", rather than mentioning the densely packed fins.
  5. lemonlime
    lemonlime Some additional information I received from Noctua regarding the review:
    Noctua wrote:
    I'm also glad to hear that you like the new backplate and the improvements of the mounting system. We'll also include self-adhesive washers to make the installation process easier in the future. The new mounting parts will also be included with the NH-U12P by the way.

    I'd also like to comment on the clearance for mainboard components and on the fin-spacing: Since the NH-U9B is quite a bit lower, we had to pack the fins a little tighter in order to keep the overall surface area large enough so that the cooler can cope with higher heat loads. The same thing goes for the smaller clearance underneath the fin stack. Due to the smaller size of the NH-U9B, this doesn't result in compatibility issues because it nicely fits into the 95mm LGA square that has a maximum component height of 25mm.
  6. GHoosdum
    GHoosdum Looks like another winner. Great review, too... I think your testing methodologies are much more rigorous than most websites go into for heatsink reviews. :bigggrin:
  7. BuddyJ
    BuddyJ The NH-U9B is still making rounds.

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!