How fast is this?

Geeky1Geeky1 University of the Pacific (Stockton, CA, USA)
edited April 2004 in Folding@Home
[10:55:59] Project: 563 (Run 49, Clone 1, Gen 157)
[10:55:59]
[10:55:59] Assembly optimizations on if available.
[10:55:59] Entering M.D.
[10:56:24] (Starting from checkpoint)
[10:56:24] Protein: p563_BBA5_ext
[10:56:24]
[10:56:24] Writing local files
[10:56:24] Completed 5000 out of 250000 steps (2)
[10:56:24] Extra SSE boost OK.
[10:58:53] Writing local files
[10:58:55] Completed 7500 out of 250000 steps (3)
[11:01:22] Writing local files
[11:01:24] Completed 10000 out of 250000 steps (4)
[11:03:50] Writing local files
[11:03:52] Completed 12500 out of 250000 steps (5)
[11:06:15] Writing local files
[11:06:17] Completed 15000 out of 250000 steps (6)

Looks pretty fast to me... what do you think?

Comments

  • JakeJake Alec Baldwin's Chest Hair
    edited April 2004
    Not quite as fast as this:

    [22:40:50] Project: 563 (Run 297, Clone 4, Gen 119)
    [22:40:50]
    [22:40:50] Assembly optimizations on if available.
    [22:40:50] Entering M.D.
    [22:41:20] (Starting from checkpoint)
    [22:41:20] Protein: p563_BBA5_ext
    [22:41:20]
    [22:41:20] Writing local files
    [22:41:20] Completed 12500 out of 250000 steps (5)
    [22:44:05] Writing local files
    [22:44:07] Completed 15000 out of 250000 steps (6)
    [22:46:53] Writing local files
    [22:46:55] Completed 17500 out of 250000 steps (7)
    [22:49:41] Writing local files
    [22:49:43] Completed 20000 out of 250000 steps (8)
    [22:50:44] Writing local files
    [22:50:46] Completed 22500 out of 250000 steps (9)

    :buck:
  • qparadoxqparadox Vancouver, BC
    edited April 2004
    You might wanna check those times Jake, his is actually faster ;).

    approx: 2:26 vs 2:45
  • NecropolisNecropolis Hawarden, Wales Icrontian
    edited April 2004
    I take you times and lower them ;)

    [05:45:59] Project: 733 (Run 36, Clone 7, Gen 16)
    [05:45:59]
    [05:45:59] Assembly optimizations on if available.
    [05:45:59] Entering M.D.
    [05:46:05] Protein: p733_villin_md
    [05:46:05]
    [05:46:05] Writing local files
    [05:46:05] Extra SSE boost OK.
    [05:46:09] Writing local files
    [05:46:11] Completed 0 out of 5000000 steps (0)
    [05:47:59] Writing local files
    [05:48:01] Completed 50000 out of 5000000 steps (1)
    [05:49:49] Writing local files
    [05:49:51] Completed 100000 out of 5000000 steps (2)
    [05:51:39] Writing local files
    [05:51:41] Completed 150000 out of 5000000 steps (3)
  • KingFishKingFish
    edited April 2004
    I'm in between you guys somewhere.

    [06:35:07] Project: 563 (Run 349, Clone 3, Gen 109)
    [06:35:07]
    [06:35:08] Assembly optimizations on if available.
    [06:35:08] Entering M.D.
    [06:35:20] Protein: p563_BBA5_ext
    [06:35:20]
    [06:35:20] Writing local files
    [06:35:20] Extra SSE boost OK.
    [06:35:24] Writing local files
    [06:35:26] Completed 0 out of 250000 steps (0)
    [06:38:57] Writing local files
    [06:38:59] Completed 2500 out of 250000 steps (1)
    [06:42:30] Writing local files
    [06:42:32] Completed 5000 out of 250000 steps (2)
    [06:46:02] Writing local files
    [06:46:04] Completed 7500 out of 250000 steps (3)
    [06:49:34] Writing local files
    [06:49:36] Completed 10000 out of 250000 steps (4)
    [06:53:06] Writing local files
    [06:53:08] Completed 12500 out of 250000 steps (5)


    KingFish
  • DragstkDragstk Syracuse, N.Y.
    edited April 2004
    You guys are absolutly awsome
    :smokin:
    It's that kind of proformance that puts our team where it is.
    :clap:
  • leishi85leishi85 Grand Rapids, MI Icrontian
    edited April 2004
    [11:14:00] Project: 563 (Run 167, Clone 5, Gen 138)
    [11:14:00]
    [11:14:00] Assembly optimizations on if available.
    [11:14:00] Entering M.D.
    [11:14:13] Protein: p563_BBA5_ext
    [11:14:13]
    [11:14:13] Writing local files
    [11:14:13] Extra SSE boost OK.
    [11:14:17] Writing local files
    [11:14:19] Completed 0 out of 250000 steps (0)
    [11:17:04] Writing local files
    [11:17:06] Completed 2500 out of 250000 steps (1)
    [11:19:51] Writing local files
    [11:19:53] Completed 5000 out of 250000 steps (2)
    [11:22:38] Writing local files
    [11:22:40] Completed 7500 out of 250000 steps (3)
    [11:25:24] Writing local files
    [11:25:26] Completed 10000 out of 250000 steps (4)
    [11:28:10] Writing local files
    [11:28:12] Completed 12500 out of 250000 steps (5)
    [11:30:57] Writing local files


    this is mine, just wondering, what kind of processors are those?
    mine is a athlon 1700+ at 2.42ghz
  • KingFishKingFish
    edited April 2004
    Mine is a 2800+ at stock speed, 1 gig of ram

    KingFish
  • NecropolisNecropolis Hawarden, Wales Icrontian
    edited April 2004
    2500+@2.4ghz
  • t1rhinot1rhino Toronto
    edited April 2004
    Check out these times. :D

    [09:15:59] Project: 563 (Run 349, Clone 3, Gen 109)
    [09:15:59]
    [09:15:59] Assembly optimizations on if available.
    [09:15:59] Entering M.D.
    [09:16:05] Protein: p563_BBA5_ext
    [09:16:05]
    [09:16:05] Writing local files
    [09:16:05] Extra SSE boost OK.
    [09:16:09] Writing local files
    [09:16:11] Completed 0 out of 5000000 steps (0)
    [09:16:59] Writing local files
    [09:17:01] Completed 50000 out of 5000000 steps (1)
    [09:18:49] Writing local files
    [09:18:51] Completed 100000 out of 5000000 steps (2)
    [09:19:39] Writing local files
    [09:19:41] Completed 150000 out of 5000000 steps (3)
  • Geeky1Geeky1 University of the Pacific (Stockton, CA, USA)
    edited April 2004
    Mine's a Mobile 2600+ at 2.68GHz :D
  • JakeJake Alec Baldwin's Chest Hair
    edited April 2004
    qparadox wrote:
    You might wanna check those times Jake, his is actually faster ;).

    approx: 2:26 vs 2:45

    :smiles:

    Not when you look at total time to do five frames. Mine is 9:26, Geeky's is 9:53.

    :Pwned:
  • JakeJake Alec Baldwin's Chest Hair
    edited April 2004
    Necropolis_UK wrote:
    I take you times and lower them ;)

    [05:45:59] Project: 733 (Run 36, Clone 7, Gen 16)

    ;D
  • NecropolisNecropolis Hawarden, Wales Icrontian
    edited April 2004
    Jake wrote:
    ;D

    No-one mentioned what protein it was, just the time ;D;D;D
  • LeonardoLeonardo Wake up and smell the glaciers Eagle River, Alaska Icrontian
    edited April 2004
    Before you poo-poo these frame times, keep in mind that both Folding instances are running simultaneously - one Gromacs and one Tinker.
  • KingFishKingFish
    edited April 2004
    Nice Leonardo :)

    KingFish
  • res0r9lmres0r9lm Florida
    edited April 2004
    I got a p733_villin_md. same as Necropolis_UK. Getting 2:30 per a frame under linux with xp@2011. Problem could be better if it was servering 4 other nodes.
  • LeonardoLeonardo Wake up and smell the glaciers Eagle River, Alaska Icrontian
    edited April 2004
    p733_villin_md

    I don't remember - is that Tinker or Gromacs?
  • res0r9lmres0r9lm Florida
    edited April 2004
    I think those are gomacs.
  • mmonninmmonnin Centreville, VA
    edited April 2004
    Gromacs.

    Hey Leo, disable those pictures on EM3 and it wont look so squished.

    And oh yeah, the next version of EM3 is out.:)

    And after looking at the pic I see I got a damn tinker while I was at work.
    em3.JPG 64.5K
  • LeonardoLeonardo Wake up and smell the glaciers Eagle River, Alaska Icrontian
    edited April 2004
    That's the same version you are running - 2.5.1. Hey, I like the pictures of molecules!
  • Straight_ManStraight_Man Geeky, in my own way Naples, FL Icrontian
    edited April 2004
    I have had all those, marc, and they are all Gromacs. Soem of the numbers used to be used for Tinkers, but the detailled WUs you show are Gromacs. They all need Core_78 or Core_79.

    EMIII related also, not as to looks but as to EMIII 2.5.1 quirks....

    Funny thing, EMIII has no data for my P4's CPU, it cannot calc the hourly or daily pointage average production after 27 WUs through the box and almost a week with EMIII on it, but the Barton box's EMIII calcs fine with same version of EMIII installed EAXCT same way.

    The calc routine does not know what to do with a CPU that runs at 3512 MHz, per the EMIII cpu speed caclculator. BUT, for me right now that is a non-issue as Folding on the personal box is happening in SuSE 9.0 mostly now (posting from Mozilla right now, a 1.7 beta client that works sweetly for browsing, no ads except Google ads show (those I can tolerate fine and have clicked on a few just on principle), and it treats boxed graphical ads on front page of S-M as popups). FASTER than in XP, and my production is starting to show the difference. BUT, anyone else with that speed machine and no average calcs might want to tell WeatherMan what is up. EMIII DOES know what a Barton 2800+ is.

    John D.
  • OverLoadOverLoad
    edited April 2004
    how and where do i get those stats?
  • LeonardoLeonardo Wake up and smell the glaciers Eagle River, Alaska Icrontian
    edited April 2004
    Download and install Electron Microscope III here . Designed and written by a fellow Folding@Home enthusiast!
  • mmonninmmonnin Centreville, VA
    edited April 2004
    Yep great guy that writes that program. There is an S-M skin for download at his site as well if you want that.
  • LeonardoLeonardo Wake up and smell the glaciers Eagle River, Alaska Icrontian
    edited April 2004
    Ooh, I didn't know that!
  • res0r9lmres0r9lm Florida
    edited April 2004
    I've been getting tinkers here lately. newest one is only 20 frames but is taking 20 minututes per a frame. You guys on windows might get better times because core65 runs slower on linux I guess it could be worst I could be running intel :(
Sign In or Register to comment.