Need FahCore_78.exe ***Now need Core_79.exe***

TBonZTBonZ Ottawa, ON Icrontian
edited April 2004 in Folding@Home
As some of you may know, the network at my work prevents the auto-downloading of new cores from Stanford as they release them.

What I need is someone to please upload the core so I can get these P4's working again.

Puleeeeeeeezzz. :)

BTW - I think the latest version is 1.56.

Comments

  • mondimondi Icrontian
    edited April 2004
    v 1.56
  • TBonZTBonZ Ottawa, ON Icrontian
    edited April 2004
    Thx a million Mondi! :cheers:
  • mmonninmmonnin Centreville, VA
    edited April 2004
    I have 1.59 on one of my machines. I didnt know it existed.
  • TBonZTBonZ Ottawa, ON Icrontian
    edited April 2004
    1.59? Well, I guess I had better keep a close eye on these machines in that case.

    Another thing, I went to the Stanford cores page before asking here and I didn't know what to do with the files they had listed such as core_78.fah and so on. Anyone know what's up with that?
  • csimoncsimon Acadiana Icrontian
    edited April 2004
    you may also need the tinker core as well as the fahcore_79 ...just in case you get some of those projects.
  • KingFishKingFish
    edited April 2004
    I think I have vers 1.56 on the machines under my control. What are the advantages of 1.59 versus 1.56? Is that to correct the stability issues under amd procs?

    KingFish
  • csimoncsimon Acadiana Icrontian
    edited April 2004
    I'm looking into it. I assumed that v1.59 was an older core_79 that had since been updated to v1.61 ...

    [07:46:36] + Processing work unit
    [07:46:36] Core required: FahCore_79.exe
    [07:46:36] Core found.
    [07:46:36] Working on Unit 05 [April 13 07:46:36]
    [07:46:36] + Working ...
    [07:46:36]
    [07:46:36] *
    *
    [07:46:36] Folding@home Double Gromacs Core
    [07:46:36] Version 1.61 (March 22, 2004)

    Marc is v1.59 definitely from core_78?

    at any rate ...when the newer cores are needed they are automatically downloaded ...however in tbonz case that can't happen.
  • mmonninmmonnin Centreville, VA
    edited April 2004
    1.61 is the double gromacs core.

    [11:15:37] Folding@home Gromacs Core
    [11:15:37] Version 1.59 (March 4, 2004)
    [11:15:37]
    [11:15:37] Preparing to commence simulation
    [11:15:37] - Assembly optimizations manually forced on.
    [11:15:37] - Not checking prior termination.
    [11:15:37] - Expanded 576114 -> 3576045 (decompressed 620.7 percent)
    [11:15:37] - Starting from initial work packet
    [11:15:37]
    [11:15:37] Project: 212 (Run 42, Clone 64, Gen 0)

    Dont know where this came from. I will have to look around the community later on.
  • Straight_ManStraight_Man Geeky, in my own way Naples, FL Icrontian
    edited April 2004
    mmonnin wrote:
    1.61 is the double gromacs core.

    [11:15:37] Folding@home Gromacs Core
    [11:15:37] Version 1.59 (March 4, 2004)
    [11:15:37]
    [11:15:37] Preparing to commence simulation
    [11:15:37] - Assembly optimizations manually forced on.
    [11:15:37] - Not checking prior termination.
    [11:15:37] - Expanded 576114 -> 3576045 (decompressed 620.7 percent)
    [11:15:37] - Starting from initial work packet
    [11:15:37]
    [11:15:37] Project: 212 (Run 42, Clone 64, Gen 0)

    Dont know where this came from. I will have to look around the community later on.


    Please do, Mark.... MIGHT be a beta Core, as my p212s are using Core_78 version 1.56 and are slower than the dickens.... 15:50 min:sec per frame on the P4, 17:59 per frame on the Barton (EMIII is gussing total run time for that one at 29 hours, 50+ minutes, about what reality is saying for the Barton). I am running a 44/44/0 on both boxes. Maybe I will kill the job, try for a new Core_78 by wiping the core, see if I get same (only the core, not the pended WU)-- in fact, DID, got another Core_78, version 1.56. Probably a beta core, or not all servers have it yet to give out.

    The GOOD news is at least they are 160 (?) point WUs. So, the good part of a long haul calc WU pair is that by 7:00 Central time tomorrow I will be at least 160 points ahead of where I am now....(well I lost one of them that was not turned in when a server at stanford decided to check its file system and take through rebuild day, so will make up that pointage in next few days) :D (Which is 25606.3 points).

    BUT, if you find out, please let us have one of those cores as an attachment or download, pretty please... :D :hoping: , and with :respect:

    John D.-- who likes new Client and Core software toys to play with and see how they run... :D
  • fatcatfatcat Mizzou Icrontian
    edited April 2004
    p212's are 160pts... EMIII bug
  • mmonninmmonnin Centreville, VA
    edited April 2004
    Good, about the point thing.

    I know I did run a few WUs under the beta team but I dont know if that was a cause of that. Not going to attach it until I find out for sure. 7AM class tomorrow so I dont have a chance to look at the community tonight.
  • csimoncsimon Acadiana Icrontian
    edited April 2004
    I just noticed another new core I have here ...[21:33:11] + Processing work unit
    [21:33:11] Core required: FahCore_78.exe
    [21:33:11] Core found.
    [21:33:11] Working on Unit 00 [April 18 21:33:11]
    [21:33:11] + Working ...
    [21:33:12]
    [21:33:12] *
    *
    [21:33:12] Folding@home Gromacs Core
    [21:33:12] Version 1.62 (April 2, 2004)
  • mmonninmmonnin Centreville, VA
    edited April 2004
    Oh yeah the WU I mentioned above was with a beta WU.

    That WU must be for a certain WU like mine was.
  • csimoncsimon Acadiana Icrontian
    edited April 2004
    I got this one for a beta wu 2.
  • TBonZTBonZ Ottawa, ON Icrontian
    edited April 2004
    My clients are stuck at work again trying to download the Gromacs core 79. :banghead:

    Can anyone help?

    I tell you it burns me that I can't automatically get these cores. :rarr:
  • MedlockMedlock Miramar, Florida Member
    edited April 2004
    I tried, but it won't let me attach it... Too big.

    fahcore_79.zip:
    File Too Large. Limit for this filetype is 488.3 KB. Your file is 676.1 KB.

    Sorry
  • KwitkoKwitko Sheriff of Banning (Retired) By the thing near the stuff Icrontian
    edited April 2004
    http://www.kwitko.net/cores/FahCore_79.zip
  • csimoncsimon Acadiana Icrontian
    edited April 2004
    Core_78 v1.62
    Core_79 v1.63
    Core_65 v2.52
  • TBonZTBonZ Ottawa, ON Icrontian
    edited April 2004
    Thx guys, you know I appreciate it. :thumbsup:
  • csimoncsimon Acadiana Icrontian
    edited April 2004
    I'll host these for a while tbonz ...if there's anything else you need let me know!
  • TBonZTBonZ Ottawa, ON Icrontian
    edited April 2004
    Thx Chris, I'm back in business so I won't be needing the files any longer but maybe someone else will. :)
  • csimoncsimon Acadiana Icrontian
    edited April 2004
    Oh yes they'll stay in case someone needs them ...I also have the service files needed to set up F@H as a service.
  • mmonninmmonnin Centreville, VA
    edited April 2004
    Terry would you be able to download it from SM if it was in a download section or something?
  • LeonardoLeonardo Wake up and smell the glaciers Eagle River, Alaska Icrontian
    edited April 2004
    What am I missing? If the core is bad, just stop Folding, delete the core from the client folder, restart, and a new core is automatically downloaded and employed.
  • mmonninmmonnin Centreville, VA
    edited April 2004
    His work network doesnt allow for it to be downloaded. WUs but not cores.
  • LeonardoLeonardo Wake up and smell the glaciers Eagle River, Alaska Icrontian
    edited April 2004
    Man, sorry I missed your post, Terry. I would've emailed whatever you asked for. Leo - day late and dollar short, again! :rant:
  • TBonZTBonZ Ottawa, ON Icrontian
    edited April 2004
    mmonnin wrote:
    Terry would you be able to download it from SM if it was in a download section or something?

    Absolutely, provided the cores were kept up to date. :cool:

    Hey np Lynn, I've been well taken care of. :thumbsup:
  • mmonninmmonnin Centreville, VA
    edited April 2004
    Thinking it over, its prolly better to have someone email/upload it somewhere so we dont get in trouble with Stanford. Someone is around about all the time to give you a core.
Sign In or Register to comment.