Looking for an A64 board... -URGENT-

Geeky1Geeky1 University of the Pacific (Stockton, CA, USA)
edited January 2005 in Hardware
I need to figure out what A64 board to buy by like Wednesday at 11am, because I need to get the system together before school starts

here's the deal:

My dad is looking to buy two new computers... my siblings are starting to play fairly graphically-intense games such as The Sims 2, and the older machines just aren't up to it anymore. The Athlon system will handle it (barely), but the P3 has a TNT2 in it or something, so yeah....

So now I'm looking for an A64 board and I have no idea what I'm doing. I haven't kept up on them because frankly, I haven't really cared... I told him he might want to wait for the NF4, but as long as whatever system I build or he buys now can handle games and stuff 18 months or 2 years down the road, he doesn't really have a problem just buying new systems when they need to be upgraded next time... the only upgrades he's really done to the two machines we've got now are to put a r9700 Pro in the Athlon when my brother's games wouldn't run on the GF2MX that was in it, and to put another 512MB of RAM in the P3... so upgradeability isn't a huge issue for him.

Obviously, it has to be stable. A. Because he'll get pissed if it's not and B. Because if it's not and I build it, guess who's fault it'll be? Exactly. So stability is important.

If I can get my hands on an ASUS A8N SLI board, I'll go with that unless you guys have a reason not to, but I don't think I'll be able to, and I doubt he wants to pay that kind of money for a board anyhow. So I was looking at the MSI K8N Neo2 Platinum, but Newegg hasn't got them, no one around here has them, and if I build them, I'll need to do it before school starts, so I need the parts fairly soon.

Are there any other good boards out there? What are the best boards out there at the moment? Any boards I should avoid at all costs? And do you guys really think that S939 is that important in this case? I mean I know it's faster, but is it THAT much faster? There's a much better selection of S754 boards... :-/ Oh, and overclockability isn't really a big deal.

One last thing. If you had to choose between only these boards, which one would you go with?: (these are the only boards the local place we buy a lot of the systems at work from has for the A64 at the moment, and if he decides he wants to have them build it, I'll need to choose one of these boards)
Asustek K8N-E Deluxe- $137.00 NVIDIA nForce3 250Gb Chipset, Socket 754
Asustek K8V SE Deluxe- $126.00 VIA K8T800 Chipset, Socket 754
Asustek A8V Deluxe- $138.00 VIA K8T800Pro + VT8237, Socket 939
Asustek SK8N- $190.00 Nvidia nForce3 Pro Chipset, Socket 940
«1

Comments

  • ThraxThrax 🐌 Austin, TX Icrontian
    edited December 2004
    I would grudgingly take the K8T800 pro, as it's the only socket 939 in the bunch. Yes, 939 is important -- yes, it's <b>that</b> important.
  • profdlpprofdlp The Holy City Of Westlake, Ohio
    edited December 2004
    Geeky1 wrote:
    ...I was looking at the MSI K8N Neo2 Platinum, but Newegg hasn't got them...
    Mwave has them in stock. (Cheaper than newegg, too.) I'm ordering tomorrow, so you'd better not buy the last one. :D
  • edited December 2004
    Something nForce 4 would be the best choice. Are they even available yet?
  • profdlpprofdlp The Holy City Of Westlake, Ohio
    edited December 2004
    TheSmJ wrote:
    Something nForce 4 would be the best choice. Are they even available yet?
    Newegg lists a Chaintech, two Gigabyte, and an Asus board. All are out-of-stock, though the Asus and one of the Gigabyte boards have an ETA of a few days to a week.
  • edited December 2004
    The ASUS A8N-SLI Deluxe is in stock at GameVE. I've bought a few things from them without any problems.
  • JimboraeJimborae Newbury, Berks, UK New
    edited December 2004
    Personally as stability is more important than overclockability then I'd go for Asus this time. Having said that my K8n Neo2's stability is rock solid, it's just having had an Asus K8V SE Delux I really liked the quality and it too was rock solid. As these are available local to you then I'd go Asus. Also it sounds like you have to buy local too as you dont appear to have got time to rma something if doesn;t work.

    As for whether you buy S754 or s939, I'm not sure, in your partiicular situation, it's not as important as it usually is. You just need a machine quickly, that works & will play games and that it will last 18-24 months and wont need upgrading in the mean time. S754 will fit that bill. Sure, if you buy s939 now you'll be able to upgrade the cpu in 2 years time, but thats all you'll be able to upgrade unless you get a NF4 board. The dual channel memory controller of s939 is not that much faster than single channel and s754 cpu's have a higher clock speed to compensate. Clawhammer cpu's also have a larger cache too.

    Where S939 is important is if you think you'll upgrade in the next 6-12 months.
  • ThraxThrax 🐌 Austin, TX Icrontian
    edited December 2004
    GameVE is definitely a quality establishment. A tad slow on the shipping, but they've never done me wrong.
  • Geeky1Geeky1 University of the Pacific (Stockton, CA, USA)
    edited December 2004
    Jim: I won't touch a board with a Via chipset unless it's my only choice. Which is why the Asus is my last resort.

    Talked with my dad about the NF4 SLI board. He has no interest in getting it. He doesn't like going with bleeding edge technology, and he doesn't really want to spend the extra $100. So, it'll be either the MSI or a s754 board with an nVidia chipset.

    I'm still not convinced that s939 is that much of an advantage in this case. The chance of a CPU upgrade in the future is effectively zero... How much slower are we talking about here? I thought s754 was only a few % slower than s939...
  • edited December 2004
    I'd go with the nForce3-250 board, then. The 754 will be fine for what it's needed for.
  • ShortyShorty Manchester, UK Icrontian
    edited December 2004
    There is nothing fundamentaly wrong with a VIA based A64 chipset. I wish people would put away the "oh I remember the days of the KT133". Please it's over. Move on people!

    Pick what works financially with this machine as it isn't going to get upgraded in the near future. Socket 754 boards & chipsets have been around longer even though S939 maybe the "new hot" thing. This isn't going to be overclocked? Then use your noodle and get something rock solid stable. What you don't spent on "the latest, greatest" board.. you can spend on solid memory for it ;) That will provide more stability than any other fundamental component (pretty much) in your A64 of choice.

    Socket 754 is "technically" slower then Socket 939 but only overclockers & true enthuiasts would notice. A difference you won't see in real world performance.

    Pick what is in stock, find a clawhammer(754) or a Winchester(939) if they have one and some GOOD memory (that is so important!) and you are set :)
  • Geeky1Geeky1 University of the Pacific (Stockton, CA, USA)
    edited December 2004
    RAM: I was planning on using 2 of these...
    http://www.newegg.com/app/viewProductDesc.asp?description=20-146-219&catalog=23&manufactory=BROWSE

    And is the Via chipset better than the nforce3?

    (oh, and Shorty... I wasn't just thinking KT133... I was thinking KT133A, KT266... KT266A, KT333... KT400... KT600... etc. ;);D)
  • edited December 2004
    The KT133A was a great chipset (one of the fastest of it's time I believe). It was pretty much everything after that which was either lackluster in value, or just total crap.
  • ThraxThrax 🐌 Austin, TX Icrontian
    edited December 2004
    KX133, bad.
    KZ133, bad.
    KT133, bad.
    KT133A, good.
    KT266, bad.
    KT266A, great.
    KT333, great.
    KT400, decent.
    KT600, poor.

    And no, no chipset since the KT333 has been superior to an nVidia chipset. It's not that the new VIA chipsets have fundamental problems, it's just that they're slower than the competition for the same pricepoints, and that's a quandry I will not support monetarily in the computing world.
  • JimboraeJimborae Newbury, Berks, UK New
    edited December 2004
    Agree 100% with what Dan says. The KT800pro is a very good chipset, I'd also point out that I got hit very badly with the Nforce chipset, punkbuster & ati bug but apparently that's been resolved now. So it's not just via chipsets that have problems.

    As for ram Corsair Value ram will work just fine as well & may save your dad a few bucks too. Spend the extra on video card.

    If I was in your shoes right now I'd probably go with a S754 Via chipset board. In real world performance the difference wont be seen & it'll save money but provide the speed & stability desired.
  • edited December 2004
    I'll also recommend the EPoX EP-9NDA3+ to you Geeky. Of course it's an EPoX, which Thrax hates (and Omega loves ;) ), but so far mine has been a stellar board with great stability. It's also using the nforce3 Ultra chipset, so you have good overclocking options and true locked pci/agp busses. The mobo also comes very well equipped with 2-round ide cables, gigabit lan, 2-1394 firewire, 4-SATA (only 2 are locked though, just like the MSI and not a problem if not overclocking), 2-IDE>SATA power connectors and a little takedown screwdriver and also a pack of heatsinks for the pwm mosfets. Also, Newegg has them in stock for $126 and EPoX now warrantees their boards for 2 years instead of 1 like they used to.

    I'd stay socket 939 Geeky, since it's looking more and more like the dual core A64's that will be coming out(at least initially) will be drop-ins on socket 939 boards and will initially be using ddr1 memory controllers like present.
  • GnomeWizarddGnomeWizardd Member 4 Life Akron, PA Icrontian
    edited December 2004
    i wish i still had the benches of the A64 3500+ s939 ( my pops machine ) vs my A64 3400+ s754 There is literally NO diff is speed
  • Geeky1Geeky1 University of the Pacific (Stockton, CA, USA)
    edited December 2004
    Ok guys, I've got 4 systems here... 2 from this local company (www.pixelusa.com), 2 from Newegg, Atacom, SVC, and Pixelusa that I'd be assembling myself. 2 are S939, the other 2 are S754.

    Here are the two from Pixel:
    System 1 (S754):
    Case Antec SLK-3700BQE
    Power Supply 350w, w/case
    Motherboard ASUS K8V SE Deluxe
    CPU AMD Athlon 64 3400+ s754
    RAM Samsung 512MB PC3200 (x2)
    Video Card PNY GeForce 6800GT (?)
    Sound Card Integrated
    Network Card Integrated
    Hard Drive Maxtor DiamondMax 10 200GB SATA
    CD-RW LiteOn 52/32/52 (Black)
    DVD-RW LiteOn 16x dual-layer (Black)
    Zip Drive Iomega Zip250 (Black)
    Floppy Mitsumi 3.5" (Black)

    CPU Heatsink Zalman CNPS7000A-Cu
    CPU Fan Integrated w/heatsink
    Case Fans Need to pick some up from SVC
    IDE Cable 18" ATA-133 round dual-drive (silver) (x2)
    Floppy Cable Single drive round 10" (silver)

    Windows Windows XP Home
    Office Office 2003 Small Business

    System 2 (S939)
    Same as above, except:
    Motherboard: ASUS A8V Deluxe
    CPU AMD Athlon 64 3500+


    DIY Systems (parts from Newegg, Atacom, etc.)
    System 1 (S754)
    Same as the above systems except:
    Motherboard: MSI K8N Neo Platinum
    CPU: AMD Athlon 64 3400+ (retail)
    RAM Mushkin Basic series PC3200 512MB (x2)
    Video Card: Gigabyte GeForce 6800 128MB (I know it's a gigabyte, but it's passively cooled, which is a major plus)
    Zip: Iomega Zip750 (Black)
    Floppy: Samsung 3.5" (Black)
    CPU Heatsink: Thermalright XP-90
    CPU Fan: Thermaltake 92mm Smart Fan w/LEDs
    Case Fan: Thermaltake 120mm Smart Fan w/LEDs (x2)

    System 2 (S939)
    Same as DIY #1 except:
    Motherboard: MSI K8N Neo2 Platinum
    CPU: AMD Athlon 64 3500+ (retail) (hopefully a newer 90nm one, but I can't guarantee that as it's like $50 or $75 more than the 130nm one)

    Thoughts?
  • TheLostSwedeTheLostSwede Trondheim, Norway Icrontian
    edited December 2004
    Base the system off the MSI or Epox S939 and a Newcastle S939 cpu. Those are actually much more stable than the Winchesters. A lot of Winchesters fail stresstests at stock lately, hence why AMD pulled a million cpu's from the retailers. AMD will never admit to that, but i have good sources about this. They have just started to ship newer steppings on their winchesters.

    6800
    MSI or Epox
    2X512mb of TCCD which will do 5,2,2,2 at 200 (timings helps a lot when the htt is at stock)
    AMD 3200+ Newcastle

    Killer setup that isn't that expensive.
  • Geeky1Geeky1 University of the Pacific (Stockton, CA, USA)
    edited December 2004
    The more I hear about the nf3 boards, the less I like them :-/ I'm tempted to change those 2 MSI NF3 boards to the MSI K8T Neo-FISR2 (754) and the ASUS A8V Deluxe (939), respectively...
  • Geeky1Geeky1 University of the Pacific (Stockton, CA, USA)
    edited December 2004
    Make that A8V the MSI K8T Neo2 FIR (s939)
  • Omega65Omega65 Philadelphia, Pa
    edited December 2004
    Get S939 ONLY! (You'll kick your self later - Click the Athlon 64 Comparison link in my sig for more info)

    Motherboards:
    MSI K8N Neo 2 Platinum ($139 shipped from Monarch Computer in GA)
    Epox 9NDA3+ $126
    Epox 9NDA3J $99 @ Newegg
    Abit AV8 (K8T800 Pro Chipset) $111 @ Newegg

    CPU S939 90nm - Monarch has Lower prices than Newegg and the Latest Stepping and manufacture weeks)
    3200+ (10x 2.0ghz) - OEM: $179 - Retail: $216
    3500+ (11x 2.2ghz) - OEM: $259 - Retail: $329

    A S939 Newcastle is a safe choice also
  • Geeky1Geeky1 University of the Pacific (Stockton, CA, USA)
    edited December 2004
    I can get the MSI K8N From Atacom if I need to... but I'm getting conflicting messages here:
    Via vs. nVidia. Which one is going to be more stable/reliable?

    Epox is out. I know too many people that have had issues with them. I won't touch them, at the very least not for other peoples' systems. I might buy one for myself, but not for someone else... :-/
  • Omega65Omega65 Philadelphia, Pa
    edited December 2004
    If your not OCing, then either is fine.

    If you OCing the VIA K8T800 Pro chipset tops out around 260mhz Memory (HTT can go upwards of 270-300 if your lucky). The NF3-250GB or Ultra can do over 300mhz Mem and HTT depending on your CPU
  • Geeky1Geeky1 University of the Pacific (Stockton, CA, USA)
    edited December 2004
    no overclocking. But I do need something that's not going to be giving me problems... it needs to operate reliably and stably at the stock settings. And I can't seem to find out which chipset has fewer bugs... :-/
  • TheLostSwedeTheLostSwede Trondheim, Norway Icrontian
    edited December 2004
    Neither chipsets have any bugs at stock settings as far as i know.
  • JimboraeJimborae Newbury, Berks, UK New
    edited December 2004
    As Omega said if you're not overclocking then either fine, at stock there's no decirnable difference in speed between s754 & S939 or between Nvidia & Via. Both are stable and I dont know of any bugs with the Via chipset.

    At the end of the day you have to decide which you are more comfortable and which best suits you're needs. I think its fairly obvious that you're not going to get uniform opinion from any of us here. :)
  • JimboraeJimborae Newbury, Berks, UK New
    edited December 2004
    Mackanz wrote:
    Neither chipsets have any bugs at stock settings as far as i know.

    Punkbuster enabled servers + ati graphics card gave the nforce3 chipset problems. i.e. terrible lag while playing online, myself and a quite a few others suffered with this. As i said earlier, I think ati's later drivers were supposed to this out
  • Omega65Omega65 Philadelphia, Pa
    edited December 2004
    IMHO use a VIA Chipset mobo with a ATI Video Card & Use Nvidia chipset with a Nvidia Video Card

    Since you seem to leaning towards it... Get the Abit AV8 S939 (K8T800 Pro) and a Newcastle (130nm) 3200+ or 3500+ S939 CPU

    On my K8T800 Pro KV8 Pro the SATA ports showed up simply as Channel 5 & 6 on the main BIOS screen. No drivers needed - although I did load them (VIA 8237 SATA Raid & Normal SATA drivers)
  • Geeky1Geeky1 University of the Pacific (Stockton, CA, USA)
    edited December 2004
    meh. I may consider the ABIT but the board layout (power connectors, northbridge) is AWFUL.

    Jimborae: What am I most comfortable with? The NF3 and a MSI or ASUS board.
  • ThraxThrax 🐌 Austin, TX Icrontian
    edited December 2004
    If you're going to be uncaring about the socket you take, which has monetary rammifications, I absolutely cannot fathom why a chipset and a power socket bother you. It's not like it matters.. Really, it doesn't.
Sign In or Register to comment.