PowerMac G5 Supercomputer Cluster

Omega65Omega65 Philadelphia, Pa
edited September 2003 in Science & Tech
<a href="http://www.thinksecret.com/news/virginiatech.html&quot; target=_blank>Virginia Tech building PowerMac G5 Supercomputer Cluster</a>

<i>August 30, 2003 - Virginia Tech University is building a Power Mac G5 cluster that will result in a supercomputer estimated to be one of the top five fastest in the world.

In yesterday's notes article, we reported that Virginia Tech had placed a large order of dual-2GHz G5s to form a cluster. Since that time, we've received additional information, allowing us to confirm a number of details.

According to reports, Virginia Tech placed the dual-2GHz G5 order shortly after the G5 was announced. Multiple sources said Virginia Tech has ordered 1100 units; RAM on each is said to be upgraded to 4GB or 8GB.

The G5s will be clustered using Infiniband to form a 1100-node supercomputer delivering over 10 Teraflops of performance. Two sources said the cluster is estimated to be one of the top five fastest supercomputers in the world.

However, Virginia Tech's on a deadline. The university needs to have the cluster completely set up this fall so that it can be ranked in Linpack's Top 500 Supercomputer list.

Apple bumped Virginia Tech's order to the front of the line -- even in front of first day orders -- to get them out the door all at once. Sources originally estimated the G5s will arrive the last week of August; they're still on track to arrive early, possibly next week.</i>

Comments

  • ThraxThrax 🐌 Austin, TX Icrontian
    edited September 2003
    .... ;D

    So with Apple in the supercomputer market, I suppose terraflops don't mean anything now? :rolleyes:;D
  • TemplarTemplar You first.
    edited September 2003
    Exoflops!!1!1 :D
  • ThraxThrax 🐌 Austin, TX Icrontian
    edited September 2003
    iFlops?
  • LeonardoLeonardo Wake up and smell the glaciers Eagle River, Alaska Icrontian
    edited September 2003
    ...Virginia Tech had placed a large order of dual-2GHz G5s to form a cluster...

    Why would they order computers to build a supercomputer. Wouldn't it be more cost effective to just order memory and CPUs in bulk?

    ...Virginia Tech has ordered 1100 units; RAM on each is said to be upgraded to 4GB or 8GB.

    I have not done the math. Would 1100 units (2200 processors?) 1100 X 4-8GB RAM really put this system into teraflop output?
  • mmonninmmonnin Centreville, VA
    edited September 2003
    Using Apple math it would.
  • Omega65Omega65 Philadelphia, Pa
    edited September 2003
    Leonardo said
    I have not done the math. Would 1100 units (2200 processors?) 1100 X 4-8GB RAM really put this system into teraflop output? [/B]

    Easily. You have 2200 2ghz CPUs altogether for (4.4thz combined) Each CPU only has to produce 1/4 Flop/mhz and I 'm sure the IBM 970 64bit chip is in the multiple Flop/mhz range
  • danball1976danball1976 Wichita Falls, TX
    edited September 2003
    Considering that it takes 1100 apple 2GHz dual CPU (2200CPU's) computers to produce 10TFlops, and it takes only around 2000 or so Opteron CPU's in an actual supercomputer config to produce 10TFLops, that then really isn't much of a supercomputer.

    (Correct me if I'm wrong)

    I wonder how much of a communication lag there will be compared to an integrated supercomputer system.
  • LeonardoLeonardo Wake up and smell the glaciers Eagle River, Alaska Icrontian
    edited September 2003
    bytes
    kilogytes
    megabytes

    what's next? where dos 'flop' come in?
  • danball1976danball1976 Wichita Falls, TX
    edited September 2003
    Leonardo said
    bytes
    kilobytes
    megabytes

    what's next? where dos 'flop' come in?

    Come in where?

    Gigabytes
    Terabytes
    Exabytes
  • Omega65Omega65 Philadelphia, Pa
    edited September 2003
    FLOP = Floating Point Operation (multilpy or add)
  • ThraxThrax 🐌 Austin, TX Icrontian
    edited September 2003
    Megaflop
    Gigaflop
    Terraflop
    Petaflop
    ...
    Exoflop
  • danball1976danball1976 Wichita Falls, TX
    edited September 2003
    Thrax said
    Megaflop
    Gigaflop
    Terraflop
    Petaflop
    ...
    Exoflop

    I thought it exa came after tera and then after exa was peta. I could search google.

    After searching Google:

    10<sup><font size=1><b>3</b></font></sup> Kilo - 1 thousand
    10<sup><font size=1><b>6</b></font></sup> Mega - 1 million
    10<sup><font size=1><b>9</b></font></sup> Giga - 1 billion
    10<sup><font size=1><b>12</b></font></sup> Tera - 1 trillion
    10<sup><font size=1><b>15</b></font></sup> Peta - 1 quadrillion
    10<sup><font size=1><b>18</b></font></sup> Exa - 1 quintillion
    10<sup><font size=1><b>21</b></font></sup> Zetta - 1 sextillion
    10<sup><font size=1><b>24</b></font></sup> Yotta - 1 septillion

    For Binary Conversions:
    In computing, a custom arose of using the metric prefixes to specify powers of 2. For example, a kilobit is usually 2<sup><font size=1><b>10</b></font></sup> = 1024 bits instead of 1000 bits. This practice leads to considerable confusion. In an effort to eliminate this confusion, in 1998 the International Electrotechnical Commission approved new prefixes for the powers of 2. These prefixes are as follows:

    kibi- Ki- 2<sup><font size=1><b>10</b></font></sup> = 1 024
    mebi- Mi- 2<sup><font size=1><b>20</b></font></sup> = 1 048 576
    gibi- Gi- 2<sup><font size=1><b>30</b></font></sup> = 1 073 741 824
    tebi- Ti- 2<sup><font size=1><b>40</b></font></sup> = 1 099 511 627 776
    pebi- Pi- 2<sup><font size=1><b>50</b></font></sup> = 1 125 899 906 842 624
    exbi- Ei- 2<sup><font size=1><b>60</b></font></sup> = 1 152 921 504 606 846 976

    The Commission's ruling is that the metric prefixes should be used in computing just as they are used in other fields. Thus, 5 gigabytes (GB) should mean exactly 5 000 000 000 bytes, and 5 gibibytes (GiB) should mean exactly 5 368 709 120 bytes.

    All information comes from this website:
    http://www.unc.edu/~rowlett/units/prefixes.html
  • Geeky1Geeky1 University of the Pacific (Stockton, CA, USA)
    edited September 2003
    Well apparently Virginia Tech hasn't been impacted by the current state of the economy :rolleyes:

    Think anyone will tell them that 1100 AMP/Opteron systems would've been cheaper & faster?
  • danball1976danball1976 Wichita Falls, TX
    edited September 2003
    Someone would probably tell them, but they won't listen.

    How useful are Macs to a university when there are hardly any applications available for use on a Mac running BSD?
  • Geeky1Geeky1 University of the Pacific (Stockton, CA, USA)
    edited September 2003
    The availablity of applications is totally irrelevant in this case, because they're being used as a beowulf cluster. In all probability, the application(s) they're going to be used for are custom-tailored, one-off pieces of software that could be written for just about any platform in existence.
Sign In or Register to comment.