Athlon 64 3200+ (Socket754) 3DMark Benchmark!
Omega65
Philadelphia, Pa
OMFG!!!!
To put this 3DMark 2001SE Score in perspective....
Thrax: Tbred 2.3ghz Radeon 9700 Pro (342/342): 18008
Geeky1: Tbred 2.5ghz Radeon 9700 Pro (391/340): 18383
Tbreak: Athlon 64 3200+ @ 2.15ghz......... 24182
3DMark 2001SE @ Stock Chip & Vid Card Speeds: 20627
To put this 3DMark 2001SE Score in perspective....
Thrax: Tbred 2.3ghz Radeon 9700 Pro (342/342): 18008
Geeky1: Tbred 2.5ghz Radeon 9700 Pro (391/340): 18383
Tbreak: Athlon 64 3200+ @ 2.15ghz......... 24182
3DMark 2001SE @ Stock Chip & Vid Card Speeds: 20627
QuadDamage said
Athlon64 3200+ is here
That's right folks. Thanks to our man, Abbas, i'm able to check out the cheapest and slowest of new A64 chips. I can tell you that it's an Intel killer. Look at this screenshot, look at the speed It's a first page score and we're just warming up
.
.
It's (a) r9800 Pro 128mb at 520/390 using plain water. So far our best with Intel at 4100mhz at r9800 Pro at 533/390 is 24747, so go figure
0
Comments
In the Quake 3 timedemo they managed to get over 500 fps
I cant wait
I wonder how it will
What speed is the 64 3200+ by default?
NS
:sad2:
:bawling:
Well. It was good to be on top of this world for atleast a month. Ah well. I love AMD for slaughtering my score with a slower chip, but I hate them for slaughtering me so badly. Goddamn. +6200 points, -200MHz, -15MHz FSB...
I can officially say we have all been owned.
I cant WAIT to see the Socket 940 Athlon 64 in action after the 23rd.
I'd be interested to see the score with a stock 9700 pro, so I could compare it to my scores with an un-overclocked system...
The K8 Crush chipset needs another revision, and damn fast. The SK8N hasn't even hit full retail production because there are some major bugs. Kinda like...It's 40% slower than the AMD8000...
Maybe it's time for a P4 3.2 and a prometia system and a 9800 pro 256 and 2GB of DDR4200 and and and I must beat that score! :bawling:
//EDIT:
I also noticed the chip did 2.4GHz at 1.5V!!!
10MHz ~= 100 after how many MHz?
Clearly not for all MHz otherwise your 342MHz would only yield 3,400 points.
The chip made a difference, no doubt, but I think the card made up close to (if not more than) 50% of the difference.
1. Higher IPC
2. Brand new core, so there's not years of refinement behind it like there is with the K7*
3. 2.4GHz @ 1.5V = less heat = potentially more GHz!
* Yes, I know the K8 is very similar to the K7, but so much has been changed too that all the refinement that went into the K7 cannot just be carried over to the K8. Just think of what a better optimized core will bring, especially one on a 90-nanometer process.
So I misread the page. Heh. We all do that.
However, in terms of GPU overclocking above stock speeds, 10MHz = 100 points. I've seen it on 3 different video cards, and probably 60-100MHz on every card. So he's got 160MHz on me, that means 1600 points. Bah.
Memory means very little, perhaps 20MHz = 100 points. So let's call it +1800 points for video.
4200 points from chip alone. Still red hot.
/me silently puts the P4's away... time to start saving for the A64...
//EDIT: 587 FPS in the Quake 3 timedemo? HOLY ****.
3DMark 2001SE @ Stock Chip & Vid Card Speeds: 20627
TBreak Athlon 64 Setup: