Well, Intel's just smacked the crap outta AMD.
http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=11785
5-7 Ghz, 4000mhz FSB (that's not a typo), 2mb+ Cache. Now get this, they stack like... lego's for 64bit architecture. All this about mid 2004
Not to mention the (edit) 10.2ghz Nehalem in 2005 :o
5-7 Ghz, 4000mhz FSB (that's not a typo), 2mb+ Cache. Now get this, they stack like... lego's for 64bit architecture. All this about mid 2004
Not to mention the (edit) 10.2ghz Nehalem in 2005 :o
0
Comments
Besides, you KNOW that's got to be a DDR or QDR setup, there's no way it'll run at 4000 REAL Mhz. Not that 1000 mhz fsb wouldn't be a great accomplishment though.
Chip stacking...Sigh. Way to place ultra-hot air pockets between overly-hot chips. Can you imagine the price of these half-assed 64 bit chips?
<b>New Intel Pentium V Duo feat. Hyperthreading IX, 4mb l2 cache, netSUPERBURST cache, 64bit architecture - $2100 bundle</b>
GG Intel.
theoretically.
Call this a marketing bomb that *ntel dropped on AMD.
Good post. Thats exactly what AMD have done with all their paper-launches. (their paper-launches have been official, thats the only difference) . Now they have to taste their own medicine in a way. If i had the money and i was ready to buy a 3 ghz FX and this statement about a 7ghz chip was official, i would consider waiting.
"Quad pumped" 1000MHz FSB is already here with only minor overclocking. See System 1 below. 4000 real FSB, well, that's a pipe dream (pardon the pun).:rolleyes2
Hey Thrax, what do you bet Thermaltake is already designing and working out a marketing tactic for another Super Dooper, Stupendous, Nuclear Powered, King of the World, Best-Overclocker-Evar Wonder Orb CPU cooler, to tame this fantasy Intel beast?
Isnt it 250 fsb quad-bumped now for 1000 in total? Quad-bumped 1000 fsb is a little different.
Current 1000 FSB is 250MHz x 4 (DDR500).
We're talking something approximately 40% faster than the fastest DDRII-667 chips (333.66MHz actual). DDRII-1000..Cough..impossible by then..cough.
or are they going to use something like heatpipe technology in order to transport the heat efficently
ive noticed after i post a thread it takes like week for any 1 to say anything
Why doesn't Thermaltake just get a hold of the ceramic heat shielding material that the space shuttle uses and go with that. No fan needed. Can take 8,000,000,000,000,000,000 degrees yet you can hold it in your hand.
The problem with a 7, 8 or 10 GHz processor is it is like putting a dragster engine in a Pinto. The only way you can truly benefit is if the rest of the system catches up. We know that video cards and ram will have the faster pipelines....but here comes the boat anchor...the hard drive. SATA won't do much, RAID 0 SATA won't do much.
Until someone comes up with an affordable mainstream hard drive that can push 1 GB/sec transfer speeds....the data will remain coming off the drives just the same and windows won't boot much faster.
Although I think we'll rip those DVDs a bit faster.
Don't forget the ground affects package that scrapes the ground over anything higher than a fallen leaf.
Pwned
im not scaww-e its the misfits, they are scary
dont yall know who the misfits are?! i bet u heard them and didnt know it, every 1 knwos the misfits, Last Carress?? American Psycho?? Hybrid Moments?
/mm gives it a thump in the right direction.
naw but i wanna see what kind of HS this kind of processor is gonna need.
The next few years are going to be exciting is all I can say..
Replace money by P4 7GHz and I believe ya
The same site also posted summit about AMD64 being forced down Intel's throat by our friends M$. I can see why but that would hurt Intel badly, as it's like endorsing AMD64 properly (sorry but Linux won't do that, good as it is/will be).
Intel has two real benefits over AMD - high clockspeed numbers are easy to sell, and secondly, HyperThreading or ACTUAL dual core technology (soon).
AMD is likely to follow with their own dual-core stuff at some stage. AMD has the benefit of AMD64.
Annoyingly in real life HT has more benefits for most people most of the time...
I don't think the P4 pipeline will need to be much longer than about 25 to hit that kinda speed. The P4 was designed for high clocks, at a cost (as already mentioned).
The AMD chips have had an increase in their pipelines too, but it's shorter. Who knows if they need to step up their pipeline sizes to get those massive clocks too
It's gonna be a good race. Expect prices to drop. Those who bought a P4EE have really rubbed those with the Xeons up the wrong way (price wise) (BAD PR move, Intel )
The gloves are off now, I reckon the PR machines are warming up slowly. Once AMD has enough volume production things get interesting