Geforce 4 MX 440SE or Geforce 2 GTS?
I have an older pc with a Hercules Geforce 2 GTS. I would like to upgrade the graphics card a bit but don't won't too spend much since it's my secondary pc. Will I notice a big difference if I get the Albatron Geforce 4 MX 440SE. I noticed it's only $50 at Newegg. The memory clock is only listed as 200, I can't remember my gf2 clock speeds off the top of my head but I'm pretty sure the memory clock is higher than 200. Can anyone tell me if the GF4MX will actually be noticeably faster? Think it might be able to run UT2003 at medium setting so I can get some network games going?
0
Comments
Despite being called a Geforce 4, the MX line is based on Geforce 2 technology, with slighly more preformace (about 5% in most of the charts in the link.) I would say it is a waste of 50 bucks.
Avoid all GFx-MX type cards. Nvidia makes them for suckers.
Either keep your money or get a DX8 (GF3 or GF4 or Radeon 8500/9100) or aDX9 (ATI Radeon 9500/9600 or GF-FX 5600 or higher card) capable card.
Thanks for the help guys.
Edit: I made this thread by accident it was supposed to be a new reply to my other thread, and now I can't delete it. Sorry for the confusion.
Thanks for the help guys.
Fixed.
you have a ti4600 and you cant play ut2003
NJot mnay places do em anymore, id get a 9500 pro for a budget card, they have DirectX 9.0 support and are very powerful cards
Craig
NS
The Ti4600 is in my main system. I was just wondering if I could get a cheap (below $100) card to replace the Geforce 2 GTS in my old system. Doesn't look like anything in that pricerange would do enough of a difference to make it worthwhile though.
tried going to www.google.com?
Craig
1) the geforce fx run's way to hot
2) there was something wronge with my card because at stock speeds i was getting ripping in windows
3) the fx i had wouldnt overclock to save its life