Noooo!!! Bad image! Bad, bad, BAD image!!
http://www.compusa.com/products/product_info.asp?product%5Fcode=307520&csearch=&cmid=&pfp=srch1
It has a window.
It has a coolermaster Jet heatsink.
It's in a coolermaster case.
It has a light.
It's a... COMPAQ!?!?!?!
Yes, it's a Compaq.
This is even more wrong than Dell's "gaming" machines.
What's worse is that people will buy them.
It has a window.
It has a coolermaster Jet heatsink.
It's in a coolermaster case.
It has a light.
It's a... COMPAQ!?!?!?!
Yes, it's a Compaq.
This is even more wrong than Dell's "gaming" machines.
What's worse is that people will buy them.
0
Comments
This is bad, because?
Cannot compute.
Runtime error.
BSOD.
*geeky1's head blows up*
Ya, I too am a fan of their older design and wish they wouldn't have gone away from it. With it's .... stuff it looked so incredible.
SARCASM
Double Hyper-Threading! We wouldn't want to miss out on that!
Hey, I'll give Compaq credit for at least being aware of trend towards performance gaming machines. I won't badmouth the computer too much, as I know nothing about the case and heatsink that machine sports.
It's not about the looks. It's about the fact that I have yet to see ANY big OEM (Gateway, Compaq/HP, Dell, EMachines, basically anything that's more-or-less a household name) produce anything that's worthy of being called a "high performance" machine. And the fact that they insist on selling machines that are touted as such bugs me.
What's not high performance about a P4 3.2C, 1 GB pc3200, 2x 120 GB SATA drives Raid-0'ed, and a Canterwood chipset (note that I left out the 5950)?
Sure you can't tinker with anything in the bios, but it is still a fast system and IMO deserves the "High Performance" title.
Now what pisses me off are these computer shops in Indianapolis that advertise custom built pc's with horrible cases, 350w power supplies, P4 1.8A's, 512 MB pc800 RDRAM, 60Gb HD, a 4x dvd-rw burner, a tv tuner, windows xp home, and a Radeon7000 as bleeding edge technology and top of the line computer. Priced at just $2400. On my break during driver's ed I decided to head over to this place called Computer Renaissance. I looked at their prices and they were ridiculous. REFURBISHED 4.3 GB HD's for $50, 128 MB of PC133 for $75, Athlon 2000+'s for $150. Just total crap. Only thing in the shop I considered buying were some k6-2's for $10, but the only drawback is I doubted they were in working condition. Some have Thermal wax, paste, and grease all over the heatspreader.
/me grumble grumble
I hate that place
It has one of <a href="http://www.antec-inc.com/pro_details_cooling.php?ProdID=76003">these</a>
Yes, it has a P3 heatsink. How did they attach a P3 heatsink to a S478 P4? They replaced the Intel-designed mounting system with a couple of clips that bolt onto the motherboard.
The base on that heatsink is smaller than the heatspreader on the P4.
I took it off, replaced the thermal compound with Ceramique, blew out all the dust, and checked the BIOS' temperature readout.
It was reading 50*C and climbing fast. I didn't have time to do anything about it, so I just left it and let the P4's thermal protection take care of it.
That's the kind of screwup that makes it difficult for me to believe that Compaq didn't screw up SOMETHING on this one.
If not, is there any way you'll let me shoot him for you?
Seriously, they're just business machines, but going the Athlon-route would have been prefered by me. Could save about $80 or so just on the CPU by going with a 2400+ rather than a 2.2GHz p4 and have more F@H power. But, I won't be able to put F@H on them anyway so I guess it doesn't matter. Shame too . . . that could be 46GHz of Athlon power folding for me.
I agree. The machines at my office are an assortment of low performance first generation P4s, primarily - Dells and IBMs. The one exception is our POS Gateway 850MHz Celeron wonder. AND, it JUST HAPPENS to be our file server! For the most part, the snail 1st generation P4s are perfectly adequate for our office applications.