Got a new score... raised FSB up to 217 (x12) @ ~2.8Ghz and oc'd my 5900 to 430/880. For some reason when I ran 3dMark03 I got a lower score than before after raising my videocard... I think I read about that happening in a couple reviews... which is unfortunate
It's because the core's getting so hot that the protection built into the drivers is clocking it back down towards 2D speeds which would explain the lowering of your score.
That's why I got a waterblock for mine. 510 core and no slowdown or artifacts and I think it'll do more.
Hmm.. that definately sucks... at what temp. does the core clock down? Right after I did the PCMark test and played some COD my core was just under 60C... The "threshold" thingy says 140C and the "warning" check box is not checked... My ambient on the card is about 30C.
I am going to add some AS3 to it today cause it's all I have and can get locally.
LeonardoWake up and smell the glaciersEagle River, AlaskaIcrontian
edited December 2003
System 2: 3897
System 1: Problem -- The system will run all tests, but won't give results at the end - won't give a score at all. What am I doing wrong? Something wrong with my software setup?
I raised my FSB 3 more notches and managed 5083 :P Those few extra points rule hehe. I think im done benchmarking though for awhile. 5k seems like a good number for this benchmark.
Comments
Score: 3586 PCMarks
Here is a new link to proove it.
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?pcm04=74592
PCMark 04 Score : 4100 @ default settings and default clocks
My machine tends to beat out others until it comes to the video tests. That's because of my lameass GF3 Ti200.
Anyway... Here is the PCMark04 Score
Lookie below!
That's why I got a waterblock for mine. 510 core and no slowdown or artifacts and I think it'll do more.
I am going to add some AS3 to it today cause it's all I have and can get locally.
System 1: Problem -- The system will run all tests, but won't give results at the end - won't give a score at all. What am I doing wrong? Something wrong with my software setup?
i had a few apps running in the background...
could this benchmark be taking advantage of HT?SMP?
can someone with a dual AMD run this app and compare scores..
and whats
Graphics Memory - 64 Lines
(FPS) 75.5
other people are hitting the 2000's
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?pcm04=99387
Graphics Memory - 64 Lines
(FPS)
im getting 75 whiles a GFTI4200 is getting 700's
And I am using a Radeon 9700 and scores 2287 in that test.
I am not using an A64 or a dual setup though.
You could be having a driver issue.
Look here:
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?pcm04=74592
Barton 2500+ @2070 MHz, 768 MB DDR333 at 172 base.
Gainward GF4 4800 SE,128 MB RAM.
John.
I raised my FSB 3 more notches and managed 5083 :P Those few extra points rule hehe. I think im done benchmarking though for awhile. 5k seems like a good number for this benchmark.
Amd Barton 2500+ @ 202 x 11 - 2222 Mhz
Retail Ati 9800 Pro
2 x 512 Samsung pc3200 DDR Dual mode
2 Maxtor 40 Gig Raid - 0 Stripe
umm Yaynstuff
Here is the link for the xp/2000 download of it from microsoft website : http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowsmedia/9series/encoder/default.aspx
Otherwise just go to google and try "windows media encoder download" then in the pull down menu make sure it shows encoder and not window media player
hope this helps
You need to download Windows Media Encoder, I believe that's the name.
There is more info in the readme file.
3873 PCMarks
on a stinky little Intel 2.4c w/ 2x256 MB Corsair TwinX and an ATI 9700 PRO.
Edit:// and in pro version
5594.
linky: http://service.futuremark.com/compare?pcm04=187281
I'll try to squeak 5600 out.
I did that and it still wont run. I am reinstalling to 2k in a few days so I guess I'll just wait and try again then.