Actually I don't think I'll need help. Sorry, the numbers of the resources I had to dump into Medlock for the level 20 residence is sticking out in my mind. Ugh.
You know, as I typed that out it came to mind that with Medlock no longer under my control I can make settlers from my first village and send them out instead. It's gonna take a lot longer of course but at this point I'll take what I can get.
fourstar forwarded me a message from the multihunter regarding a multiple user account. He knew about our problems with GoDsend so he thought I would be interested in knowing that the multihunters DO try to help.
I'm getting tired of him taking villages every few days. Since I know that the account never sits dormant, there is no way to sneak attack him/them. So... I sent them another IGM with more details and named names... they might not be able to find proof on the multiple user thing but maybe they are doing other things against the rules...
if there are multiple users, they will be able to find it out as they have access to all the IP's that log in to the account and when they go on.
if they see more than one, and 24hour access from various ones, he may well be banned eternally.
which would also mean no taking back your villages, but i think you can live with that!
I'm not sure its feasible at this stage, but if it becomes available I would consider moving back in. If my options are that or solidify the outpost, I'd rather solidify the outpost.
no, if a player is banned, they can't be attacked.
when you go to attack them you get a message saying 'you cannot attack this player as they were banned for a rule violation'
so if Godsend is banned, the powerbase villages just sit there...
also, his account is never dormant, that could just mean he has two good sitters in other time zones, but only he can launch actual assaults.
if the villages were all taken within a normal time slot, say 4-10am GMT, then that would probably mean it's just sitters...
no, if a player is banned, they can't be attacked.
when you go to attack them you get a message saying 'you cannot attack this player as they were banned for a rule violation'
so if Godsend is banned, the powerbase villages just sit there...
also, his account is never dormant, that could just mean he has two good sitters in other time zones, but only he can launch actual assaults.
if the villages were all taken within a normal time slot, say 4-10am GMT, then that would probably mean it's just sitters...
He actually admitted that he shares his account with his two brothers so they're online 24-hrs a day.
I've checked the rules; catapulting your own village is not in violation. Friendly fire rules only apply to raiding and village captures. Beachhead will be catapulting some of Roadblocks buildings
I've checked the rules; catapulting your own village is not in violation. Friendly fire rules only apply to raiding and village captures. Beachhead will be catapulting some of Roadblocks buildings
if the villages are yours, it's anything goes.
you can actually capture your own villages as well.
say you founded village B with village A, but village A now has a huge army and you want to capture somewhere with a senator from it, then village C can capture village B and the expansion slot in village A used to sound village B will be free, and one expansion slot is used up in village C.
although it has good theory, it's still a very retarded move as you lose quite a lot from it...
only used by people who have troops and resources to spare, like our friend Godsend...
He actually admitted that he shares his account with his two brothers so they're online 24-hrs a day.
yeah, i think that's against the rules. bye bye godsend (i hope)
just post it in a forum username that's different from your travian username. and don't mention names of any players/alliances at all.
just that Godsend is banned *evil cackle*
fourstar forwarded me a message from the multihunter regarding a multiple user account. He knew about our problems with GoDsend so he thought I would be interested in knowing that the multihunters DO try to help.
I'm getting tired of him taking villages every few days. Since I know that the account never sits dormant, there is no way to sneak attack him/them. So... I sent them another IGM with more details and named names... they might not be able to find proof on the multiple user thing but maybe they are doing other things against the rules...
fourstar forwarded me a message from the multihunter regarding a multiple user account. He knew about our problems with GoDsend so he thought I would be interested in knowing that the multihunters DO try to help.
I'm getting tired of him taking villages every few days. Since I know that the account never sits dormant, there is no way to sneak attack him/them. So... I sent them another IGM with more details and named names... they might not be able to find proof on the multiple user thing but maybe they are doing other things against the rules...
But we're not all online 24/7 with a brother playing for us Besides, I have a strong feeling all they're going to do is get the lesser players to send their resources to the previous wonder holder to get him up and running very quickly
Comments
Suck.
Well, I filled in the empty building spaces with level 1 granaries. He can have fun demolishing them.
EDIT: Argh! That's a huge setback.
EDIT2: That's a huge understatement.
Crossroads at the outpost? can send you some stuff
Duchess:smiles:
You know, as I typed that out it came to mind that with Medlock no longer under my control I can make settlers from my first village and send them out instead. It's gonna take a lot longer of course but at this point I'll take what I can get.
fourstar forwarded me a message from the multihunter regarding a multiple user account. He knew about our problems with GoDsend so he thought I would be interested in knowing that the multihunters DO try to help.
I'm getting tired of him taking villages every few days. Since I know that the account never sits dormant, there is no way to sneak attack him/them. So... I sent them another IGM with more details and named names... they might not be able to find proof on the multiple user thing but maybe they are doing other things against the rules...
I'll keep you informed.
if they see more than one, and 24hour access from various ones, he may well be banned eternally.
which would also mean no taking back your villages, but i think you can live with that!
Well, that is if Keebler doesn't want his back... but we'll have to see what happens.
when you go to attack them you get a message saying 'you cannot attack this player as they were banned for a rule violation'
so if Godsend is banned, the powerbase villages just sit there...
also, his account is never dormant, that could just mean he has two good sitters in other time zones, but only he can launch actual assaults.
if the villages were all taken within a normal time slot, say 4-10am GMT, then that would probably mean it's just sitters...
you can actually capture your own villages as well.
say you founded village B with village A, but village A now has a huge army and you want to capture somewhere with a senator from it, then village C can capture village B and the expansion slot in village A used to sound village B will be free, and one expansion slot is used up in village C.
although it has good theory, it's still a very retarded move as you lose quite a lot from it...
only used by people who have troops and resources to spare, like our friend Godsend...
yeah, i think that's against the rules. bye bye godsend (i hope)
just that Godsend is banned *evil cackle*
Maybe use someone else, who no longer uses Travian regularly!! To post it
Crackers has a friend who doesn't really use his account much
Duchess
Duchess............
Ok, got it.