If geeks love it, we’re on it

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 review

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 review

quadro_header

The power hungry professional may look at the quiet, little Quadro FX 3800 workstation GPU and scoff. They may not even give the FX 3800 a passing glance.

“This card isn’t the mighty FX 4800, or the unstoppable 4GB monster that is the FX 5800,” they would say.

But those people would be missing out on an outstanding product. Trust us when we say that this GPU is a serious contender as an all-purpose solution–one of the best price/performance products in the workstation GPU market.

The NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 is based on the 55nm G100GL architecture, which is exclusive to NVIDIA’s workstation boards. This 1GB single-slot GPU contains 192 CUDA cores and sports an impressive amount of features:

  • NVIDIA G100GL GPU
  • 55nm process node
  • 600MHz core clock
  • 192 CUDA Cores
  • 1GB 800MHz GDDR3
  • 256-bit Memory Bus
  • 51.2GBps memory Bandwidth
  • 1×6-pin PCIe power connector
  • 108W power consumption
  • 2 x DisplayPort, 1 x DL-DVI Outputs
  • 3-Pin Stereoscopic (3D) Support (Optional)
  • Serial Digital Interface (Optional)
  • SLI Multi OS Support
  • Supports DirectX 10
  • USD$899 MSRP

quadro_fx_3800_io

The Quadro FX 3800 replaces the venerable FX 3700, but ups the ante by doubling the amount of onboard memory; increasing the core clock from 500MHz to 600MHz; adding an additional 80 CUDA cores; and adding support for technologies like optional serial digital interface (SDI) and SLI Multi OS support. The feature palette of this GPU is impressive, but let’s talk for a moment about what may be the most significant addition: SLI Multi OS.

NVIDIA SLI Multi OS allows a user with a single workstation and an SLIed pair of compatible Quadro cards to virtualize multiple Windows and/or Linux operating system environments. SLI Multi OS harnesses Parallels Workstation Extreme to assign the host OS to one dedicated Quadro GPU, and assign guest operating systems to the other. This allows one user to seamlessly operate in two different operating system environments on the same machine, eliminating the need for multiple stations. This technology is especially useful to smaller studios that do not have sufficient funds to furnish the workplace with many different workstations. SLI Multi OS is currently available on the HPz800 and the Dell T7500 certified workstations.

For this evaluation, we pitted the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 against the ATI FirePro V8750. While the FX 3800 was outclassed from the start (mid-range vs. ultra-high end), this review isn’t just a battle of speed and numbers; we’re also looking to assess the FX 3800’s overall performance for the dollar. We were confident that the Quadro FX 3800 would put on a good show, especially at its price, which is less than half of the ATI solution.

Performance

fx3800_cinebench

fx3800_maya

fx3800_3dsmax

As expected, the ATI FirePro V8750 did manage to best the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800. In Cinebench R10, the V8750 took the crown by a little over 1000 points in the OpenGL test. The results from ViewPerf 3DS Max were rather tight, as the V8750 had an increase of 7 frames per second on average. However, ViewPerf Maya results told the real story in which we see the V8750’s larger memory bandwidth and speedier GDDR5 memory play their role in for a 300% higher score.

Those numbers are hardly the point of the comparison, however. The real point of interest is the value found in the Quadro FX 3800 in its price/performance/feature window. Priced at $899, the Quadro FX 3800 is half the price of the FirePro V8750. That is some serious professional bang for your buck, especially considering the technologies that come with this GPU, most notably hardware stereoscopy and SLI Multi OS. For the professional artist that simply can’t afford the ultra high-end, the Quadro FX 3800 is quite an attractive solution.

Concerns

A point of concern for us when assessing the FX 3800 was its single-slot cooling configuration that actually works to blow heat back towards the center of your PC. We can’t recall seeing any other major GPUs that employ a similar cooling solution. Considering that most PCs are designed to pull air in from the front and exhaust out the rear, this seemed counter-productive.

rear_exhaust_quadro_fx_3800

Even so the Quadro FX 3800 did maintain stable, moderate temperatures during our testing process. We even put the GPU to a true stress test with FurMark; under a constant full load for four solid hours, the Quadro FX 3800 was completely stable at a temperature of 81 degrees Celsius. The 3800 can take the heat, but we do worry about the rest of the system. We can’t help but feel that exhausting hot air back into a chassis churning out heat under full load for extended periods of time isn’t the best idea.

Final thoughts

When it’s all on the table, the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 is an impressive workstation GPU. It is packed to the brim with compelling features and specifications in a svelte, single-slot design. Though it certainly isn’t the fastest board from NVIDIA or AMD, its price imparts outstanding the value, particularly for single users and small studios that need the reliability, speed and support of a workstation GPU without the price tag of a flagship board.

Beyond our cooling and ventilation concerns, we can completely recommend this product as an excellent workstation GPU solution.

quadro_fx_3800_top

Comments

  1. Butters
    Butters Decent, but not great FX 3800 benchmarks, the specs looks like it is based on the same specs as 260 GTX so I was hoping it would put up bigger numbers. Its well over double the price of a 5870 and yields around double the performance in most of the tests. I don't know if it would convince me to jump on it over a 5870 depending on application usage, perhaps the FX 4800 might be at the sweet spot since it can be had for $1200+.

    If you use maya, there is no question what you should get. While if you use 3ds, the FX 3800 will be your best friend. For CAD, ArcView, Solidworks users its hard to say based on these benchmarks. Though I know the Quadro's including this one, will compete with the V8750 in those apps.
  2. photodude
    photodude In interesting review. I would have like to see the ATI firepro v8700 which has performance near the v8750 but at a price competing with the fx3800.

    This is also a very narrow review since we only see the three software programs. When it comes to CAD, solidworks, etc; Just like butters said, the Quadros including the fx1800 will compete or beat the Firepro cards.

    (thanks for including the ati 5870, when reviewing workstation card one should never leave off a desktop card. I would have like to seen two desk top cards, something like a 260 GTX so we would have an ati and nvidia comparison)
  3. UPSLynx
    UPSLynx It seems there are more people than I expected wanting CAD data on benchmarks, so I will work on testing those in the future.

    The v8700 is only as 'cheap' as the FX 3800 because it is an outdated product, just as the FX 3700 can be found at a significantly lower price than the FX 3800. ATI replaced the v8700 with the v8750, and with the advances in memory (GDDR5), and other technologies, I couldn't recommend buying the older product, but of course, that is up to your jurisdiction.

    I too would like to have a 260GTX for comparison sake. Not sure if we can get one on the test bench, but I'll see what I can do.
  4. photodude
    photodude If you can swing some way to benchmark Revit 2010 I would love to see that too. Revit is taking over the market when comes to the construction industry and is fully replacing CAD. It seems there is no benchmarks for Revit and less information on creating benchmarks.....

    As for CAD you should skip it if you can't do the 2010 product line or the coming 2011 line. (occasionally I see some stuff for 2009)

    Adobe creative suite CS4 is another area for benchmarking that few if any do benchmarks for.

    since drivers with workstation cards are specific to the programs they are certified for (or have drivers written for) it's hard to say what the performance will be from a benchmark unless the benchmark is specific to the product in question.


    I hadn't heard that the v8700 was being discontinued or replaced with the v8750; I was under the impression that the two cards were co-existing and the v8750 had just taken the place as the top of the Firepro line. With the full line rounding out as V8750, V8700, V7750, V5700, V3750, and the V3700.
  5. drasnor
    drasnor I am interested in SolidWorks and Inventor benches.

    -drasnor :fold:
  6. UPSLynx
    UPSLynx Talked to our NVIDIA workstation rep today, he tipped off a good method of benching CAD. I'll see to making those an addition to our workstation GPU reviews in the future.
  7. ara You didn't get suspicious that 3800 got exactly 60fps on each and every Maya benchmark while others vary signifcantly from test to test? There is clearly some limiter at work stopping it from rendering more frames than the display sync rate is. Pro testers...
  8. UPSLynx
    UPSLynx yes, we are aware of this and are currently working on rectifying the matter. I appreciate your kind and supportive words.
  9. HsingH Does anyone know what the value difference between the FX 3700 and the FX 3800.... Also anyone heard of the issues of getting these cards (quadro) to work in SLI.... appparently only in workstations with certain motherboards, not on just any SLI enabled board.... anyone know about this and possibly how to get around it (I would believe maybe adding your board in the code when installing the Quadro drivers.... but not sure).... Good Review by the way UPS Linux

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!