If geeks love it, we’re on it

EEEpc Utils developer “giving up,” claims Ubuntu sucks

EEEpc Utils developer “giving up,” claims Ubuntu sucks

UbuntuHUGEThe Eeebuntu Project is an attempt to provide an Ubuntu Linux environment that works well ‘out of the box’ specifically on the Asus EeePC (although it is known to work on other netbooks.) One of the Eeebuntu project’s core developers, Andrew Wyatt (better known as “fewt”) is the developer of the Eee PC Utils, a package that brings Windows-like hardware ACPI management to Ubuntu.

In a recent blog post entitled “I give up,” Andrew lambasted the Ubuntu movement, claiming that Ubuntu “sucks” and that “they have the uncanny ability to take Linux back in time by piling code that doesn’t work on top of more code that doesn’t work until they have turned their OS into a garbage salad.”

Normally, rants like this can be found all over the place–railing against one platform or another–but when a devoted developer raises these kinds of concerns after investing months of his time into a project, it makes one sit up and take notice.

The question is raised every so often: Will Linux ever be accepted as a “third” legitimate desktop operating system? Do consumers have a need for a competitor to Microsoft Windows and Apple Mac OS? Pundits say that the window of opportunity for mainstream Linux has closed; when Ubuntu was new, fresh, and exciting, and Windows Vista was being nearly universally vilified, there was an opportunity for real mass market acceptance. Is it too late?

According to Andrew and many of the supportive commenters on his post, the answer is yes. While not claiming Linux itself is doomed, he paints a grim picture for the development of Ubuntu. It was, after all, supposed to be “the one” that brought Linux to the mainstream consumer desktop.

Andrew closes his blog post with a telling sentiment: “Maybe I should buy a copy of Windows 7, I hear that it actually works. How can we expect non-technical users to use this pile of garbage that is ‘Linux’?”

Comments

  1. mas0n
  2. chizow
    chizow This guy is obviously a newb. He's clearly not taking full advantage of the power of community or harnessing the awesomeness of open.
  3. Roger Sanchez I never cared for it as a desktop solution. I only want to know what future it has a server platform. I have two ubuntu servers running, and I've never had issues...are they a ticking time bomb ready to crash?
  4. lunchb0x
    lunchb0x
    I never cared for it as a desktop solution. I only want to know what future it has a server platform. I have two ubuntu servers running, and I've never had issues...are they a ticking time bomb ready to crash?

    Probably more so than any other linux server. As long as your smart with how you role out updates, it shouldn't be an issue
  5. Roger Sanchez ...great, I do not long for the days of fedora core.
  6. ardichoke
    ardichoke
    lunchb0x wrote:
    Probably no more so than any other linux server. As long as your smart with how you roll out updates, it shouldn't be an issue
    fix't (cuz lunchb0x fails at English)
  7. lunchb0x
    lunchb0x
    ardichoke wrote:
    fix't (cuz lunchb0x fails at English)

    Its true. I'd be a more productive member of society if I could spell or if I proofread.
  8. ardichoke
    ardichoke Maybe not society... but work at least.

    Anyway, as for the article, while I'm sure there are problems with bloat in the Ubuntu code it can't be that bad given that it runs and runs well using fewer resources than Vista or Windows 7 in my experience at least. Sounds to me like someone just needs to have a nap or something.
  9. Garg
    Garg As far as Ubuntu missing the window of opportunity during the Vista debacle, I'm not surprised. To capitalize on that opportunity, Ubuntu would have needed a whole lot of development from unpaid volunteers in a relatively short time, and a whole lot of marketing from Canonical (which probably doesn't have any to spare).

    Linux adoption by the mainstream remains a long-term project. Looks like some dude just lost his patience.
  10. Thrax
    Thrax A long-term and entirely unrealistic project. When your measure of success is parroting your competitor to a sufficient degree that the operation of your product is mostly indistinguishable from that competitor, you've already lost. In the mean time, trying to "win" through convincing others that your unfamiliar alternative is better than something the masses find acceptable can hardly be conceived as a win either.
  11. drasnor
    drasnor I don't agree with Thrax's and Gargoyle's sentiments. While Linux mainstream adoption would be nice, it is hardly necessary for the future success of the OS. I'm defining success as "being a good OS" which I would argue it has already achieved and will only get better in the future. While it's sad that this developer has gotten so frustrated that he is no longer maintaining his project I sincerely doubt he is unique. Projects turn over all the time, particularly those maintained by a single developer.

    Of greater concern is the accusation that Ubuntu's maintainers aren't keeping abreast of kernel and X server patches. It may be time for me to switch distros again...

    -drasnor :fold:
  12. Thrax
    Thrax Linux has by no means failed as an OS. All I refer to is their efforts to make inroads into the desktop.
  13. Linc
    Linc
    chizow wrote:
    This guy is obviously a newb. He's clearly not taking full advantage of the power of community or harnessing the awesomeness of open.
    Seriously? Was it worth typing that? :(
  14. Leonardo
    Leonardo
    This guy is obviously a newb. He's clearly not taking full advantage of the power of community or harnessing the awesomeness of open.
    Hmm, I guess out-of-the-box usability, ease of use, engaging GUI, and intuitiveness were a bit more important than "power of community."
  15. Koreish
    Koreish It clearly was, he did type it after all.

    Will Linux ever be a good OS? Maybe
    Will it ever become a true competitor of Microsoft of Apple? Probably not.
  16. ardichoke
    ardichoke
    power of community
    Wonder OS powers... ACTIVATE! Form of a functional GUI! Wait, that didn't work? Oh well, guess we will just have to develop it the hard way after all.
    Will Linux ever be a good OS? Maybe
    Wait, you mean that Linux isn't a good OS? If that's the case why is it that such a large portion of the infrastructure of the Internet runs on it? I'll concede that Linux is not an ideal desktop OS for the majority but saying it's not a good OS because of that is like saying that semi-trucks are bad automobiles because most people don't need one for their daily use.
  17. chizow
    chizow
    Lincoln wrote:
    Seriously? Was it worth typing that? :(
    LOL, I thought it was pretty funny when I wrote it. Just read it again, lol still funny. I see the satire was lost on most, maybe I should've included a smiley? :D
  18. staticcola So he's developing against a beta.

    Translation:

    Betas change hourly, by the moment. It's Software Development.

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!