Post your Super Pi 1M scores here:
OK, here's another benchmark that's been around a while and is pretty quick to run. It's called Super Pi and it calculates Pi out to various lengths. I like it because it checks how quick the particular platform can do math.
Most people bench out to either 1M or 2M places; I pefer 1M because it doesn't take as long to run. Attached is the installer I had downloaded, which actually will install it into the start menu and has an uninstaller; you can also find out on the net the program itself that you drop into a folder to run. They are both the same though; the one I'm attaching just makes it easier to get to.
Anyways, here's some scores from my machines:
1. Northie 2.4C@3300, (275X12) and 2.5-4-4-8 timings 1:1 - 41 seconds
2. XP-M 2600@2425(220X11) and 2-2-2-11 timings 1:1 - 40 seconds
3. XP-M2400@2316(178X13) and 2.5-4-4-7 timings 1:1 - 46 seconds
4. A64 3000+(skt 939)@2560(320X8) and 2.5-4-3-7 timings @ 166 setting(256 MHz) - 33 seconds
5. Pentium M 755(2.0) laptop and mem@166 and 2.5-3-3-7 timings - 42 seconds
EDIT: I updated the Superpi attachment to the latest one, which will give you your time down to 3 decimals instead of whole seconds. Please use this version instead of the old one for running Superpi.
Most people bench out to either 1M or 2M places; I pefer 1M because it doesn't take as long to run. Attached is the installer I had downloaded, which actually will install it into the start menu and has an uninstaller; you can also find out on the net the program itself that you drop into a folder to run. They are both the same though; the one I'm attaching just makes it easier to get to.
Anyways, here's some scores from my machines:
1. Northie 2.4C@3300, (275X12) and 2.5-4-4-8 timings 1:1 - 41 seconds
2. XP-M 2600@2425(220X11) and 2-2-2-11 timings 1:1 - 40 seconds
3. XP-M2400@2316(178X13) and 2.5-4-4-7 timings 1:1 - 46 seconds
4. A64 3000+(skt 939)@2560(320X8) and 2.5-4-3-7 timings @ 166 setting(256 MHz) - 33 seconds
5. Pentium M 755(2.0) laptop and mem@166 and 2.5-3-3-7 timings - 42 seconds
EDIT: I updated the Superpi attachment to the latest one, which will give you your time down to 3 decimals instead of whole seconds. Please use this version instead of the old one for running Superpi.
0
Comments
with 35 porcesses running in the background
46 seconds
1.6 P-M - 48s
Im guessing FSB matters in this since mine seems to be a lot lower than others.
It also matters what processes you have running too. Also, memory timings will factor in on it.
I have a hard time booting at anything above ~2.55, but 2.45 is my max prime stable, even with load temps in low-mid 30s.
edit~ i forgot to put my time didnt i...
1m 20s on 2ed run thru :shakehead
Don't know if it makes a difference, but it is folding at the same time.
(when compared to Gnome's, we get more proof that Athlon 64s are better than Xeons, as if we needed it
1M/39s
Getting ready to order a new (non-AMD retail version) Heat Sink for a little O/C action.
The Xeon 3.4 is probably built on a Prescott core, just goes to show what I've been saying all along about Northwood>Prescott is accurate, I'm at over 100mhz below the Xeon and turning in the same speed (yeah, my FSB is 1088, I know, I know, but that just evens up the clock speeds) I wish I could wring a few more mhz out of this chip, stably.
Have you tried F
In case you're not aware what it is about.
http://www.joinfolding.com/
Thats with a 2GB kit at loose timings. I'd easily shave a minute or 2 off with 2,2,2,5 timings.
Everything stock, specs in my sig.
Super Pi SSE2
Super Pi SSE3
+ 000h 00m 42s [1M]
My laptop is a:
Dell Inspiron 9100
P4 3.20 GHz
2GB of RAM
60G HDD (7200RPM)
Radeon 9800 AGP w/ 256MB
Its big, heavy, and is a ton of fun....
- Time: 39.719
- Model of CPU: Sempron64 2500+
- Codename : Palermo
- real mhz :2425mhz (346x7) 1.39v
- Memory Models: Markvision DDR400 @ 170mhz 2.5-3-2-7
- MB of Ram: 512
- Mobo: ASus K8N
- SO: Windows Xp Sp2
Reggarts from Chile!