Post your Super Pi 1M scores here:

13567

Comments

  • zuuszuus
    edited September 2006
    Conroe E6600 @ 3.2Ghz. Love this chip :)
    2GB PC2-8000 OCZ Platinum XTC Extreme @ 1066mhz 4/4/4/15
    Asus P5B Deluxe Wifi @ 356*9
    pi.png
  • csimoncsimon Acadiana Icrontian
    edited October 2006
    Not bad ...not core2 but not bad for what it is I suppose.
  • scoobsterscoobster
    edited December 2006
    Is it me or are all of your scores slow?
    E6600 2.4 running at 3.63
    2g Corsair
    Water cooled
    14.27 s 1m super pi
  • XooXXooX
    edited February 2007
    my score is 12.734s at 1m spI 1.5 mod XS
    e6700@4.1ghz
    2x1Go DDr² pc8000 OcZ vx² underclocked at 410 mhz, (max 600mhz) i'm stupid man: i 've forgotten to bench spI with my ram .....oinnnnn....:(
    Aircooled xpc90
  • Radio91PRadio91P Layton, UT New
    edited February 2007
    E6600 at 3.0Ghz in 16s~! Love it!:bigggrin:
  • BoneBone Canadia
    edited September 2007
    cpu in sig.

    22 seconds
  • kanehealkaneheal
    edited January 2008
    t7200 2ghz dual core 2gb ram vista home basic.
    I hit 25sec and this program only ever uses one core!!!!
    I knew my system was good but didn't realise it was that good
  • LeonardoLeonardo Wake up and smell the glaciers Eagle River, Alaska Icrontian
    edited January 2008
    Kaneheal, thanks for bringing this thread back to life. Super Pi is a benchmark test that never goes out of style.

    14 seconds on System 4 in signature: Q6600 @ 3.5GHz

    UPDATE: For curiosity's sake I ran it again with system at usual running configuration - two WinSMP clients, bunch of monitoring utilities, antivirus, and so forth. 15 seconds.
  • kanehealkaneheal
    edited January 2008
    I'd love to know what this program could do utilizing both cores. I ran this program with a basic cutdown. No antivirus side bar etc. Remember I am running a notebook too.
    That is a very impressive score I must say.
  • muddocktormuddocktor
    edited January 2008
    I just updated my original post to the latest version of Superpi, which will give your time to the thousandth of a second.
  • LeonardoLeonardo Wake up and smell the glaciers Eagle River, Alaska Icrontian
    edited January 2008
    Ha ha, the revived thread got original poster's attention.

    Thanks, I'll download that newest version.
  • ThelemechThelemech Victoria Icrontian
    edited January 2008
    Leonardo wrote:
    Kaneheal, thanks for bringing this thread back to life. Super Pi is a benchmark test that never goes out of style.

    14 seconds on System 4 in signature: Q6600 @ 3.5GHz

    UPDATE: For curiosity's sake I ran it again with system at usual running configuration - two WinSMP clients, bunch of monitoring utilities, antivirus, and so forth. 15 seconds.

    Holy $*(T, only a 1 second difference. Did I ever mention that I really want my Quad 6600 :bigggrin:. What a processor, especially for the price!
  • cemarty74cemarty74
    edited February 2008
    im new to this, but this is what i got...
  • LeonardoLeonardo Wake up and smell the glaciers Eagle River, Alaska Icrontian
    edited February 2008
    cemarty74, show your system specs. That makes everything much more interesting.
  • strikerX90strikerX90 Islamabad
    edited February 2008
    Processor:Athlon X2 3800+
    Ram:1GB kingston Value ram

    Time for 1M was 44 sec
  • FelixDeSouzeFelixDeSouze UK New
    edited February 2008
    Processor: Intel 3.4GHz Dual Core
    RAM: 3GB DDR2

    Time attached.
  • lemonlimelemonlime Canada Member
    edited March 2008
    I've been doing some tweaking on the test bench. Heres my latest:

    CPU: Q6600 @ 4GHz G0, 1.55V
    Mem: Crucial Ballistix PC2-8500 @ 1112MHz, 5-5-5-18
    Cooling: Noctua NH-U12P w/50CFM Noctua NF-P12 fan.

    1M: 12.750s

    attachment.php?attachmentid=24953&d=1204586733
  • muddocktormuddocktor
    edited March 2008
    Here's a run I just made with my main rig. I'm not pushing the proc hard at all right now either. I need to upgrade to a different case so I can rework my cooling.

    qxsuperpi1mow4.jpg
  • mmonninmmonnin Centreville, VA
    edited March 2008
    How well does one of those fold compared to a comparable 65nm quad.
  • muddocktormuddocktor
    edited March 2008
    I can't answer that Marc because I switched to Seti over a year ago. But I can tell you that Yorkfield just owns over Kentsfield in Seti. My Q6600 is running only 190 MHz slower than I'm running this QX, but the QX makes 20% more RAC (like points in F@H) than the Q6600. And that is with only a 5-6% clock speed advantage. I would think that any cache sensitive wu's would benefit greatly from the larger L2 cache of the Yorkfield procs such as mine and the just released Q9450.
  • mmonninmmonnin Centreville, VA
    edited March 2008
    I dont know Seti but its probably completely different math involved.
  • lemonlimelemonlime Canada Member
    edited March 2008
    That extra cache sure makes a difference, mudd! Even at an almost 300MHz lower clock, you outperformed my Q6600 in 1M. Those yorkies are awesome :)
  • muddocktormuddocktor
    edited March 2008
    Just for curiosity sake I bumped my QX to 4000 to see how it compares to your Q6600, lemonlime. I'm running at 10 X 400 with the ram at 1:1 and 4-4-4-12-2T timings as you can see in the screenshot.


    qx4000superpirun1cn2.jpg

    Looks like it's about a second or so faster than your Q6600 at the same clock speed.
  • lemonlimelemonlime Canada Member
    edited March 2008
    muddocktor wrote:
    ..Looks like it's about a second or so faster than your Q6600 at the same clock speed.

    And you didn't need 1.55V either :) Have you found your max clock on that monster yet?
  • muddocktormuddocktor
    edited March 2008
    No, I haven't really pushed it yet. I need to finish paying it off (damn it hurt to pay that much :eek: ) and I want to upgrade the beast to watercooling, which means a new case (which I already need because of the layout of the TJ06) and a quality waterblock like a Fuzion. I already have a good waterpump, tubing and a dual 120mm heatercore radiator. I'm thinking of a MM U2-UFO case or something like that so I can keep everything internal. The pump I have, which is an Iwaki, is a huge beast and needs a lot of room for installation inside a case.
  • primesuspectprimesuspect Beepin n' Boopin Detroit, MI Icrontian
    edited March 2008
    2x Quadcore Xeon E5405 @ 2ghz = 30 seconds flat

    Meh. If it could use 8 cores.... look out :p
  • _k_k P-Town, Texas Icrontian
    edited May 2008
    looks like you are safe muddocktor, I can't get mine to 4.0......maybe 3.95 but not 4.0

    PI_24_7.JPG
    PI_3.9.JPG


    first one is my 24/7 clock, second is bench oc at 3.9. RAM is set 1:1.
  • DaEnigmaDaEnigma
    edited August 2008
    Not bad for 4.06ghz

    29gbymf.jpg
  • _k_k P-Town, Texas Icrontian
    edited August 2008
    I don't like how this is a function of pure clock speed, poop.
  • djmonstadjmonsta London, UK Member
    edited December 2008
    well i got 13.844 outta my rig: Intel core 2 duo E8600 3.33Ghz, 4Gb DDR2 RAM, Nvidia 7695GT 512Mb Pci-e Graphics card, 750 watt PSU, some mad Gigabyte motherboard, no overclocking, no watercooled fancy cooling system, just a pc i bought bit by bit on eBay, then assembled, then smashed nearly every super pi time on this forumn bar a few.
Sign In or Register to comment.