lol, sorry i was drunk lastnight when i was talkin shit, 1680x1050 is my native resolution sorry for the size. Loosen up a bit guys, dont have to be so uptight, I'm just amazed at some of these pi scores, I thought my 10.7 was slow......
yeah sure, next time i reboot ill go into the bios and write the volts & other settings down, the one screen shot (info.jpg)has some volts, and cpuz on it, I did some screwing around this weekend and got a 10.391.
That's a C1-stepping Q9550 in a DFI LanParty JR P45-T2RS with 8GB DDR2-800 OCZ RAM running at... 940MHz? Watercooled with an older TTake 750W modular PSU.
Thanks guys... it runs cool too using the Scythe Mugen 2. After an hour of gaming I registered a high of 54C on one core and 52C on the other. The ram is way over clocked and not bad for regular Corsair PC6400... (6-6-6-18) I got lucky on the bins with that pair.
For the heck of it I ran it at 8M for a score of 2m 22.500s .. I'm kind of proud. I also see you guys used to do an Aquamark thread. I think I may run it again for old time's sake (probably won't post that one though)
I used a value of 20 (1 million). Numbers quoted are the first time value - not the one in brackets, obviously.
The CPU is a Core[1]Duo T2350 in a laptop. I have powerscaling enabled so its somewhere 800mhz-1.86ghz
Firstly i ran it under the main OS, Ubuntu (Jaunty [9.04] version). Its a lenovo C200 with 2gb of RAM.
It took 26.174 seconds. I then ran it in a FreeBSD (Virtualised in VirtualBox) which was assigned 512mb of RAM. Took 32.098 seconds. Im rather interested to see how well FreeBSD would peform on actual hardware as virtual machines tend to be much much slower at thins like this, whereas that was actually a respectable result.
Also of note is the guy above
Core 2 Duo E8400 3 GHZ stock speed
21.203s
My First-Gen Centrino CoreDuo(which is essentially a dual core pentium M) beat a newer, supposedly much more efficient CPU design with double the clock speed? Im also betting it had more cache, being (i suspect) a desktop chip.
My last entry here a few months ago was 13.844 with a standard E8600 at 3.33ghz. Now i have a decent cpu HSF and case with better airflow, i'm able to overclock while keeping the system stable (b4 it was crashing everytime i tried coz the cpu was overheating!)
Just got 12.047!!!
I'm moving the Q6600 into my linux box to run SMP for team 93. Picked up an E8500 for my main rig and just started playing with it. I'm sure she'll go higher, but my water loop has no reservoir right now and also cools an HD4890, so it's getting worked pretty hard at these speeds.
Hey... why not throw my embarrassingly high SuperPI time in here? In my own defense, I'd like to point out that the last major upgrade to this computer was January '08. At the time this was an awesome system. It still holds it's own too.
OK, finally ditched the Easy Tune pro 5 program cause system was not stable when OCing with it, so i moved to BIOS OCing. Results for my E8600 are 4.00GHz using 400MHz bus speed with 1.5v cpu instead of 1.25, obviously 10x multiplier. Ran superPi and was pleasantly surprised... last time @3.85GHz i acheived 12.047, as previously posted... this time got 11.546!!!! happy with that...
Sorry bout the pic quality btw... had some trouble getting it within the upload limit size!
Comments
:/
It's stable!
My 9550 is at 3.5, I don't believe my ram will let me get much more (ddr2 800). I've got another on order, gonna try it out in my GA EP45T Extreme.
<a href="http://www.brackinsbar.com/sp.jpg">Link</a>
For the heck of it I ran it at 8M for a score of 2m 22.500s .. I'm kind of proud. I also see you guys used to do an Aquamark thread. I think I may run it again for old time's sake
E7300 dual core, 2.66 Ghz stock speed, 4 GB ram (3.25 usable), XP Home SP2.
A lot better than the 48 seconds on my old Athlon XP 2.2 Ghz computer!
Mem: CORSAIR XMS2 4GB (2 x 2GB) 240-Pin DDR2 SDRAM DDR2 800 (PC2 6400)
see other specs in profile.
21.203s = 1M
56.750s = 2M
2m 19.390s = 4M
ftp://pi.super-computing.org/Linux/super_pi.tar.gz
I used a value of 20 (1 million). Numbers quoted are the first time value - not the one in brackets, obviously.
The CPU is a Core[1]Duo T2350 in a laptop. I have powerscaling enabled so its somewhere 800mhz-1.86ghz
Firstly i ran it under the main OS, Ubuntu (Jaunty [9.04] version). Its a lenovo C200 with 2gb of RAM.
It took 26.174 seconds. I then ran it in a FreeBSD (Virtualised in VirtualBox) which was assigned 512mb of RAM. Took 32.098 seconds. Im rather interested to see how well FreeBSD would peform on actual hardware as virtual machines tend to be much much slower at thins like this, whereas that was actually a respectable result.
Also of note is the guy above
My First-Gen Centrino CoreDuo(which is essentially a dual core pentium M) beat a newer, supposedly much more efficient CPU design with double the clock speed? Im also betting it had more cache, being (i suspect) a desktop chip.
Maybe linux is just more efficient than windows?
Just got 12.047!!!
<dl class="list_no_decoration profilefield_list"><dt class="shade" id="profilefield_title_21">Processor: Pentium D 3.00/3.07GHz <!-- //vBulletin.register_control("vB_ProfilefieldEditor", "21"); //--></dt><dt class="shade" id="profilefield_title_22">Motherboard: Abit <!-- //vBulletin.register_control("vB_ProfilefieldEditor", "22"); //--></dt><dt class="shade" id="profilefield_title_24">Memory: 2.00 GB <!-- //vBulletin.register_control("vB_ProfilefieldEditor", "24"); //--></dt><dt class="shade" id="profilefield_title_23">Video Card: ATI 256 Bit <!-- //vBulletin.register_control("vB_ProfilefieldEditor", "23"); //-->
</dt><dd id="profilefield_value_31">
</dd></dl>
Edit - please note speed stepping had apparently reduced my CPU speed in this picture. It runs at 3.6GHz under load.
Sorry bout the pic quality btw... had some trouble getting it within the upload limit size!
Got 4.15GHz now after playing round in the BIOS, got 4.3GHZ past the POST stage, but wouldn't load windows properly.
My superpi record now stands at 11.125:
Got 4Ghz @ 1.26v stable on a TRUE-120